External and body-centered frames of reference in spatial memory: Evidence from touch

The study reports independent effects of external and body-centered reference cues on spatial coding of an irregular sequence of haptic locations. The aim was to investigate the nature of spatial coding by using a modality that does not provide distal cues routinely. Our method isolates and combines body-centered and external spatial reference cues for irregularly placed locations, scanned along a raised-line route. Disrupting body-centered reference for the locations, by orienting the map differently to the body in the test phase than in the presentation phase, doubled errors in positioning the locations along the route in recall. Adding external reference, by giving instructions to use a surrounding frame for reference when body-centered coding was disrupted, reduced errors to near baseline (no-rotation) levels. Adding external reference cues to intact (not displaced) body-centered reference halved errors, as compared with the baseline. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that accurate spatial coding is determined by the congruence of potential reference cues from diverse sources. The new findings suggest that external and body-centered reference cues have independent additive effects on spatial coding. The sequence of locations had a significant effect in all the reference conditions, suggesting the additional use of fortuitous but distinctive local touch cues on the route. The discussion considers theoretical and practical implications of the results.

[1]  S Millar,et al.  Symmetry in haptic and in visual shape perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Paillard.  Motor and representational framing of space , 1991 .

[3]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[4]  Mark Holllns,et al.  Spatial updating in blind and sighted people , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  S. Millar.  Understanding and Representing Space: Theory and Evidence from Studies with Blind and Sighted Children , 1994 .

[6]  Simon R. Oldfield,et al.  The Spatial Characteristics of Tactile Form Perception , 1983, Perception.

[7]  S. Millar.  Models of Sensory Deprivation: The Nature/Nurture Dichotomy and Spatial Representation in the Blind , 1988 .

[8]  Y. Guiard,et al.  Response determination in tactile motor tasks: body-res device-centred cues , 1986 .

[9]  J. A. Adams,et al.  Short-term memory for motor responses. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  G. J. Laabs.  Retention characteristics of different reproduction cues in motor short-term memory. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  D H Warren,et al.  The Importance of Alignment in Blind Subjects' Use of Tactual Maps , 1989, Perception.

[12]  A. Baddeley.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  M. Bradshaw,et al.  Reflexive Shifts of Covert Attention Operate in an Egocentric Coordinate Frame , 2001, Perception.

[14]  S Millar,et al.  Illusions in reading maps by touch: reducing distance errors. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[15]  Susanna Millar,et al.  The Müller-Lyer illusion in touch and vision: Implications for multisensory processes , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Susanna Millar.  Self-Referent and Movement Cues in Coding Spatial Location by Blind and Sighted Children , 1981, Perception.

[17]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  A fronto-parietal system for computing the egocentric spatial frame of reference in humans , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  S. Millar.  Spatial memory by blind and sighted children. , 1975, British journal of psychology.

[19]  J. Stein.  The representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1992, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[20]  H Pashler,et al.  Coordinate frame for symmetry detection and object recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  S Millar,et al.  Spatial representation by blind and sighted children. , 1976, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  Y. Hatwell,et al.  Etude de quelques illusions géométriques tactiles chez les aveugles , 1960 .

[23]  Y HATWELL.  [Study of several geometrical tactile illusions in the blind]. , 1960, L'annee psychologique.

[24]  S. Millar,et al.  Movement Imagery in Young and Congenitally Blind Children: Mental Practice without Visuo-spatial Information , 1992 .

[25]  A. Baddeley.  Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition , 1990 .

[26]  Concurrent and Retroactive Interference Effects in Memory of Movement Patterns , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[27]  Lawrence Butler,et al.  'History: Theory and Practice' , 1997 .

[28]  S Millar,et al.  Movement Cues and Body Orientation in Recall of Locations by Blind and Sighted Children , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes , 1988, Cognition.

[30]  M. Arbib.  Interaction of multiple representations of space in the brain. , 1991 .

[31]  S Millar,et al.  Vertical and Bisection Bias in Active Touch , 2000, Perception.

[32]  S. Millar.  Modality and mind: convergent active processing in interrelated networks as a model of development and perception by touch , 2000 .

[33]  S. Millar.  Reading by touch , 1997 .

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[35]  G. Baylis,et al.  Hippocampal lesions impair spatial response selection in the primate , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  David H. Warren,et al.  Blindness and Early Childhood Development , 1977 .

[37]  Brenda Milner,et al.  Right-hippocampal contralateral-hand effect in the recall of spatial location in the tactual modality , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  G. Révész,et al.  Psychology and art of the blind , 1950 .

[39]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Misaligned Maps Lead to Predictable Errors , 1989, Perception.

[40]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Separate body- and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[41]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Mental rotation and the frame of reference in blind and sighted individuals , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Simon Ungar,et al.  Strategies for Knowledge Acquisition from Cartographic Maps by Blind and Visually Impaired Adults , 1997 .

[43]  R. Andersen,et al.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[44]  Peter Johnson.  The Functional Equivalence of Imagery and Movement , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[45]  S Millar,et al.  The Utilization of External and Movement Cues in Simple Spatial Tasks by Blind and Sighted Children , 1979, Perception.

[46]  M. Heller,et al.  Perception of the Horizontal and Vertical in Tangible Displays: Minimal Gender Differences , 1999, Perception.

[47]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .