Global Optimization for Integrated Design and Control of Computationally Expensive Process Models

The problem of integrated design and control optimization of process plants is discussed in this paper. We consider it as a nonlinear programming problem subject to differential-algebraic constraints. This class of problems is frequently (i) non-convex and (ii) "costly" (i.e. computationally expensive to evaluate). Thus, on the one hand, local optimization techniques usually fail to locate the global solution and, on the second hand, most global optimization methods require many simulations of the model, resulting in unaffordable computation times. As an alternative, one may consider global optimization methods which employ surrogate-based approaches to reduce computation times, and which require no knowledge of the problem structure. A challenging Wastewater Treatment Plant benchmark model (see [1] and references therein) is used to evaluate the performance of these techniques. Numerical experiments with different optimization solvers indicate that the proposed benchmark optimization problem is indeed non-convex, and that we can achieve an improvement of the controller performance compared to the best tuned controller settings available in the literature. Moreover, these results show that surrogate-based methods may indeed reduce computation times while, at the same time ensuring convergence to the best known solutions.

[1]  W. Gujer,et al.  Activated sludge model No. 3 , 1995 .

[2]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  The COST benchmark simulation model—current state and future perspective , 2004 .

[3]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Optimisation of control strategies for the urban wastewater system — An integrated approach , 1999 .

[4]  Sylvie Gillot,et al.  The COST Simulation Benchmark: Description and Simulator Manual , 2001 .

[5]  Benoît Chachuat,et al.  Dynamic optimisation of small size wastewater treatment plants including nitrification and denitrification processes , 2001 .

[6]  Kenneth Holmstrom,et al.  The TOMLAB Optimization Environment in Matlab , 1999 .

[7]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces , 2001, J. Glob. Optim..

[8]  Kenneth Holmström,et al.  Practical Optimization with the TOMLAB Environment in Matlab Professor Kenneth Holmström Applied Optimization and Modeling Group ( TOM ) Center for Mathematical Modeling , 2001 .

[9]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[10]  M. N. Pons,et al.  Benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants , 1999, 1999 European Control Conference (ECC).

[11]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Interaction of Design and Control: Optimization with Dynamic Models , 1998 .

[12]  I. Takács A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .

[13]  Carmen G. Moles,et al.  Integrated process design and control via global optimization: A wastewater treatment plant case study , 2001, 2001 European Control Conference (ECC).

[14]  A. Carucci,et al.  Management optimisation of a large wastewater treatment plant , 1999 .

[15]  J. Dennis,et al.  Pattern search algorithms for mixed variable general constrained optimization problems , 2003 .