Abstract The term “friction factor,” conventionally defined for fluid flow engineering calculations, is also used for solid mechanics calculations in the drilling industry. At first glance, it may seem to be a misnomer, but there are underlying facts and reasons for the adoption of the term “mechanical friction factor” that is unique to the industry. This term is used as a proxy for the coefficient of friction (COF) or the Coulomb friction, a dimensionless scalar value, in the estimation of torque, drag, and side forces for the directional tendency prediction, static displacement of string for vibration analysis, and moving pipe elastic force for transient swab/surge pressure estimation. Because of larger uncertainties in the modeling of a long drillstring, including cuttings bed, tortuosity, mud properties, fluid viscous effects, wellbore temperature, pressure, and non-uniform geometrical interferences between the drillstring and wellbore, the COF is termed as a friction factor by including the uncertainties involved without defying the mechanics involved. Another important parameter used during the planning stage in combination with the friction factors is the tortuosity factor to provide artificial undulation to the wellbore. The tortuosity factor causes an additional problem, which requires a different friction factor for the analysis, even though the COF between the drillstring and the wellbore has not changed. Because there is no industry standard for quantifying these parameters, a great deal of confusion exists between these parameters and results in the overestimation or underestimation of the frictional drag. This paper describes the details, clear definition, calibration, pitfalls, and context in which they can be used. It presents the simple guidelines and several example calculations. This paper also provides methods for evaluating these parameters with real-time data.
[1]
G. A. Haduch.
Solution of Common Stuck Pipe Problems Through the Adaptation of Torque Drag Calculations
,
1994
.
[2]
B. G. Rabbat,et al.
Friction Coefficient of Steel on Concrete or Grout
,
1985
.
[3]
Robello Samuel,et al.
How Good is the Torque-Drag Model?
,
2007
.
[4]
C. A. Johancsik,et al.
Torque and drag in directional wells-prediction and measurement
,
1983
.
[5]
B. Rasmussen,et al.
World Record in Extended Reach Drilling, Well 33/9-C10, Statfjord Field, Norway
,
1991
.
[6]
E. E. Maidla,et al.
Field Comparison of 2-D and 3-D Methods for the Borehole Friction Evaluation in Directional Wells
,
1987
.
[7]
Robert F. Mitchell.
The Effect of Friction on Initial Buckling of Tubing and Flowlines
,
2007
.
[8]
Kumud Sonowal,et al.
How Continuous Improvement Lead to the Longest Horizontal Well in the World
,
2009
.
[9]
A. A. Kireenkov,et al.
Coupled models of sliding and rolling friction
,
2008
.
[10]
Ginzburg.
Steel-Rolling Technology: Theory and Practice
,
1989
.
[11]
Walter Sextro,et al.
Dynamical Contact Problems with Friction: Models, Methods, Experiments and Applications
,
2002
.