Evaluation of new spiral shear reinforcement pattern for reinforced concrete joints subjected to cyclic loading

Using continuous spiral reinforcements can greatly improve the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns, in terms of ductility and energy dissipation capacity. The simultaneous incorporation of this method in beams and columns might influence the behaviour of beam–column connections as wide spectrums of brittle failure were observed in this region. A new proposed beam–column connection introduced as ‘twisted opposing rectangular spiral’ was investigated in this research in both experimental and numerical manners along with comparing its seismic performance with both normal rectangular spiral and conventional shear reinforcement systems. The design of three full-scale beam–column connections was performed according to Eurocode (EC8-04) for high ductility classes, and the quasi-static cyclic loading recommended by American Concrete Institute Building Code (ACI 318-08) was hired to conduct the seismic tests. Finally, the experimental results were validated by numerical results obtained from the finite element analysis of the three specimens. The results revealed improved ultimate lateral resistant, energy dissipation capacity and ductility for the new proposed connection.

[1]  T. Paulay,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1975 .

[2]  Mahmood Md. Tahir,et al.  Seismic performance of ductility classes medium RC beam-column connections with continuous rectangular spiral transverse reinforcements , 2015 .

[3]  Murat Saatcioglu,et al.  Strength and Ductility of Confined Concrete , 1992 .

[4]  John B. Mander,et al.  Observed Stress‐Strain Behavior of Confined Concrete , 1988 .

[5]  Ahmad J. Durrani,et al.  Seismic Resistance of R/C Exterior Connections with Floor Slab , 1987 .

[6]  C. Karayannis,et al.  Improvement Of Seismic Capacity OfExternal Beam-column Joints UsingRectangular Spiral Shear Reinforcement , 2005 .

[7]  Gwang-Hee Kim,et al.  Shear behavior of continuous reinforced concrete T-beams using wire rope as internal shear reinforcement , 2011 .

[8]  E. P. Warnke,et al.  CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR THE TRIAXIAL BEHAVIOR OF CONCRETE , 1975 .

[9]  A. G. Tsonos Cyclic Load Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Subassemblages of Modern Structures , 2007 .

[10]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[11]  Shamim A. Sheikh,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Columns Confined by Circular Spirals and Hoops , 1993 .

[12]  C. G. Karayannis,et al.  Shear Capacity Of RC Rectangular Beams WithContinuous Spiral Transversal Reinforcement , 2005 .

[13]  Chris G. Karayannis,et al.  Seismic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Columns With Rectangular Spiral Shear Reinforcement , 2005 .

[14]  Constantin E. Chalioris,et al.  Shear tests of reinforced concrete beams with continuous rectangular spiral reinforcement , 2013 .

[15]  Abdul Rahman Mohd Sam,et al.  Energy Absorption Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Connections, with Ductility Classes Low , 2014 .

[16]  C. Karayannis,et al.  Response Of Columns And Joints With SpiralShear Reinforcement , 2005 .

[17]  Chris G. Karayannis,et al.  Effectiveness of Rectangular Spiral Shear Reinforcement on Infilled R/C Frames Under Cyclic Loading , 2011 .

[18]  Murat Saatcioglu,et al.  Confinement of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Welded Reinforced Grids , 1999 .