Results of a field study on a driver distraction warning system

The main goal of the distraction and drowsiness field study was to evaluate a system for detecting driver distraction and drowsiness. This report focuses on the results of the study, indicating how a distraction warning system influenced glance behaviour. A vehicle was instrumented with an automatic eye tracker and other sensors. Seven participants drove the vehicle during one month each. During the first ten days a baseline was collected. Afterwards the warnings were activated, which involved that the drivers received a vibration in the seat when the algorithm determined that they had looked away from the forward roadway for a too long time. The main finding was that the drivers' gaze behaviour was not influenced much by the distraction warnings. The drivers received distraction warnings at about the same frequency during the treatment and the baseline phase. Performance indicators like "percent road centre" and others did not change from baseline to treatment phase. The average percentage of very long glances decreased slightly in the treatment phase, suggesting that the warning had an effect on the more extreme glance behaviour. There are also indications that the system helped prevent further extended glances away from the road immediately after a warning was issued.

[1]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  DRIVER DISTRACTION WITH WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[2]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[3]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  The Impact of Distraction Mitigation Strategies on Driving Performance , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  The role of driver inattention in crashes: new statistics from the 1995 crashworthiness data system , 1996 .

[6]  Johan Engström,et al.  Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty , 2005 .

[7]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[8]  Rikard Karlsson,et al.  Evaluating driver distraction countermeasures , 2005 .

[9]  Omer Tsimhoni TIME-SHARING OF A VISUAL IN-VEHICLE TASK WHILE DRIVING: FINDINGS FROM THE TASK OCCLUSION METHOD , 2003 .

[10]  Monica N. Lees,et al.  The influence of distraction and driving context on driver response to imperfect collision warning systems , 2007, Ergonomics.

[11]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Drivers' attitudes toward imperfect distraction mitigation strategies , 2006 .

[12]  Lisbeth Almén REDUCING THE EFFECTS OF DRIVER DISTRACTION: A COMPARISON OF DISTRACTION ALERTS ON DRIVER ATTENTION , 2003 .

[13]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Road Departure Crash Warning System Field Operational Test: Methodology and Results. Volume 1: Technical Report , 2006 .

[14]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Driver distraction : a review of the literature , 2007 .

[15]  T. Victor Keeping Eye and Mind on the Road , 2005 .

[16]  Albert Kircher,et al.  Distraction and drowsiness – a field study , 2009 .

[17]  Ulla Kaisa Knutsson SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE , 2003 .

[18]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.