Critical Questions Regarding Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain and Body After Injections of the Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents, Safety, and Clinical Recommendations in Consideration of the EMA's Pharmacovigilance and Risk Assessment Committee Recommendation for Suspension of the Marketing Authori

Abstract For magnetic resonance, the established class of intravenous contrast media is the gadolinium-based contrast agents. In the 3 decades since initial approval, these have proven in general to be very safe for human administration. However, in 2006, a devastating late adverse reaction to administration of the less stable gadolinium-based contrast agents was identified, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. The result of actions taken by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration, stratifying the agents by risk and contraindicating specific agents in severe renal dysfunction, has led to no new cases being identified in North America or Europe. Subsequently, in 2014, long-term deposition in the brain of gadolinium was first shown, after administration of 2 nonionic linear chelates, gadodiamide, and gadopentetate dimeglumine. This has led to an intense focus on the question of in vivo distribution, possible dechelation, and subsequent deposition of gadolinium, together with substantial clarification of the phenomenon as well as stratification of the agents on this basis. This review focuses on 8 critical questions regarding gadolinium deposition in the brain and body, with the answers and discussion therein important for future regulatory decisions and clinical practice. It is now clear that dechelation of gadolinium occurs in vivo with the linear agents and is responsible for this phenomenon, with key experts in the field recommending, except where there is no suitable alternative, a shift in clinical practice from the linear to macrocyclic agents. In addition, on March 10, 2017, the Pharmacovigilance and Risk Assessment Committee of the European Medicines Agency recommended suspension of the marketing authorization for 4 linear gadolinium contrast agents—specifically Omniscan, Optimark, Magnevist, and MultiHance (gadodiamide, gadoversetamide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, and gadobenate dimeglumine)—for intravenous injection. Cited in the report was convincing evidence of gadolinium deposition in the brain months after injection of these linear agents. Primovist/Eovist (gadoxetic acid disodium) will remain available, being used at a lower dose for liver imaging, because it meets an important diagnostic need. In addition, a formulation of Magnevist for intra-articular injection will remain available because of its very low gadolinium concentration.

[1]  U. Motosugi,et al.  Contrast Agent–Induced High Signal Intensity in Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images: Comparison of Gadodiamide and Gadoxetic Acid , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[2]  A. Bhatia,et al.  Adverse Reactions to Contrast Material: A Canadian Update , 2017, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[3]  E. Tali,et al.  Intrathecal Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Related Brain Signal Changes: Residual Gadolinium Deposition? , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[4]  W. C. Davis,et al.  Distribution map of gadolinium deposition within the cerebellum following GBCA administration , 2017, Neurology.

[5]  L. Schöckel,et al.  Histology and Gadolinium Distribution in the Rodent Brain After the Administration of Cumulative High Doses of Linear and Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[6]  Michael E Marino,et al.  Clearance of Gadolinium from the Brain with No Pathologic Effect after Repeated Administration of Gadodiamide in Healthy Rats: An Analytical and Histologic Study. , 2017, Radiology.

[7]  H. Thomsen Are the increasing amounts of gadolinium in surface and tap water dangerous? , 2017, Acta radiologica.

[8]  F. Paul,et al.  Histopathologic Assessment of Neurotoxicity after Repeated Administration of Gadodiamide in Healthy Rats. , 2017, Radiology.

[9]  Martin R Prince,et al.  Extent of Signal Hyperintensity on Unenhanced T1-weighted Brain MR Images after More than 35 Administrations of Linear Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents. , 2017, Radiology.

[10]  I. Steffen,et al.  Is There Long-term Signal Intensity Increase in the Central Nervous System on T1-weighted Images after MR Imaging with the Hepatospecific Contrast Agent Gadoxetic Acid? A Cross-sectional Study in 91 Patients. , 2017, Radiology.

[11]  C. Corot,et al.  Moderate Renal Failure Accentuates T1 Signal Enhancement in the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei of Gadodiamide-Treated Rats , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[12]  A. Radbruch Are some agents less likely to deposit gadolinium in the brain? , 2016, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  S. Naganawa,et al.  Penetration and distribution of gadolinium-based contrast agents into the cerebrospinal fluid in healthy rats: a potential pathway of entry into the brain tissue , 2016, European Radiology.

[14]  E. Hecht,et al.  Effect of Renal Function on Gadolinium-Related Signal Increases on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[15]  E. Lancelot Revisiting the Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: Differences in Long-Term Biodistribution and Excretion , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[16]  R. Semelka,et al.  Self-reported gadolinium toxicity: A survey of patients with chronic symptoms. , 2016, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Lack of increased signal intensity in the dentate nucleus after repeated administration of a macrocyclic contrast agent in multiple sclerosis , 2016, Medicine.

[18]  Penny A. MacDonald,et al.  Association Between Gadolinium Contrast Exposure and the Risk of Parkinsonism. , 2016, JAMA.

[19]  D. Hippe,et al.  Macrocyclic and Other Non–Group 1 Gadolinium Contrast Agents Deposit Low Levels of Gadolinium in Brain and Bone Tissue: Preliminary Results From 9 Patients With Normal Renal Function , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[20]  R. Semelka,et al.  Gadolinium in Humans: A Family of Disorders. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  U. Karst,et al.  Investigating the stability of gadolinium based contrast agents towards UV radiation. , 2016, Water research.

[22]  V. Runge Safety of the Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Focusing in Part on Their Accumulation in the Brain and Especially the Dentate Nucleus , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[23]  S. Lehéricy,et al.  Linear Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Are Associated With Brain Gadolinium Retention in Healthy Rats , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[24]  M. Prince,et al.  Signal Change in the Dentate Nucleus on T1-Weighted MR Images After Multiple Administrations of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Versus Gadobutrol. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  T. Frenzel,et al.  Signal Increase on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images in the Rat Brain After Repeated, Extended Doses of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[26]  H. Thomsen T1 hyperintensity in the brain after multiple intravenous injections of gadolinium-based contrast agents , 2016, Acta radiologica.

[27]  C. Corot,et al.  Non-clinical safety assessment of gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem(®)) in neonatal and juvenile rats. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[28]  Alexander Radbruch,et al.  High-Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus and Globus Pallidus on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images: Evaluation of the Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Gadobutrol , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[29]  Pascal J. Kieslich,et al.  Increased Signal Intensity in the Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images After Gadobenate Dimeglumine Administration , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[30]  V. Runge Commentary on T1-Weighted Hypersignal in the Deep Cerebellar Nuclei After Repeated Administrations of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Healthy Rats: Difference Between Linear and Macrocyclic Agents. , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[31]  E. Nagel,et al.  2015 Update on Acute Adverse Reactions to Gadolinium based Contrast Agents in Cardiovascular MR. Large Multi-National and Multi-Ethnical Population Experience With 37788 Patients From the EuroCMR Registry , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[32]  C. Mallio,et al.  Gadodiamide and Dentate Nucleus T1 Hyperintensity in Patients With Meningioma Evaluated by Multiple Follow-Up Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Examinations With No Systemic Interval Therapy. , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[33]  Richard C. Semelka,et al.  High Signal Intensity in Globus Pallidus and Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images: Evaluation of Two Linear Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents. , 2015, Radiology.

[34]  Pascal J. Kieslich,et al.  Gadolinium retention in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus is dependent on the class of contrast agent. , 2015, Radiology.

[35]  David F Kallmes,et al.  Intracranial Gadolinium Deposition after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. , 2015, Radiology.

[36]  Shigeru Furui,et al.  High Signal Intensity in Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Images: Association with Linear versus Macrocyclic Gadolinium Chelate Administration. , 2015, Radiology.

[37]  U. Panne,et al.  Analysis of Gadolinium-based contrast agents in tap water with a new hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ZIC-cHILIC) hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry , 2015, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[38]  P. Bruneval,et al.  Safety profiles of gadolinium chelates in juvenile rats differ according to the risk of dissociation. , 2014, Reproductive toxicology.

[39]  Vincenzo Di Lazzaro,et al.  Progressive Increase of T1 Signal Intensity of the Dentate Nucleus on Unenhanced Magnetic Resonance Images Is Associated With Cumulative Doses of Intravenously Administered Gadodiamide in Patients With Normal Renal Function, Suggesting Dechelation , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[40]  Daisuke Takenaka,et al.  High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. , 2014, Radiology.

[41]  C. Vidaud,et al.  Bone as target organ for metals: the case of f-elements. , 2012, Chemical research in toxicology.

[42]  T. Shigematsu,et al.  Three-year extension study of lanthanum carbonate therapy in Japanese hemodialysis patients , 2010, Clinical and Experimental Nephrology.

[43]  A. Quiñones‐Hinojosa,et al.  Animal models of neurological disease. , 2010, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[44]  A. Vossough,et al.  Metronidazole-induced cerebellar toxicity , 2010, Pediatric Radiology.

[45]  T. Frenzel,et al.  Stability of Gadolinium-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents in Human Serum at 37°C , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[46]  G. Spasovski,et al.  Evolution of bone and plasma concentration of lanthanum in dialysis patients before, during 1 year of treatment with lanthanum carbonate and after 2 years of follow-up. , 2006, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[47]  Ian Q. Whishaw,et al.  Animal models of neurological deficits: how relevant is the rat? , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  E. Marinelli,et al.  Synthesis, characterization, and imaging performance of a new class of macrocyclic hepatobiliary MR contrast agents. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[49]  V. Runge,et al.  Evaluation of gadolinium 2,5-BPA-DO3A, a new macrocyclic hepatobiliary chelate, in normal liver and metastatic disease on high field magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Investigative radiology.

[50]  P. Wedeking,et al.  Biodistribution of Radiolabeled, Formulated Gadopentetate, Gadoteridol, Gadoterate, and Gadodiamide in Mice and Rats , 1995, Investigative radiology.