The role of information availability to passengers in public transport disruptions: An agent-based simulation approach

Abstract In public transport disruptions, a key relation between the services of operating company and passengers’ satisfaction is the disseminated information. This paper proposes rigorous mathematical descriptions to describe the effects of information availability to passengers, including the user equilibrium and non-equilibrium solutions. The information availability in disruption is summarised in a “who-when-where-what” four-dimensional framework. Based on different information, passengers’ behaviours are assumed and simulated to evaluate the benefits of information availability in public transport disruption. An agent-based micro-simulation model (MATSim) is applied for the city of Zurich, Switzerland, for the benefit of activity-based simulation in a multi-modal network. We use an existing day-to-day replanning method, and extend the study with a within-day replanning approach in MATSim, to study agents’ route choices responding to public transport disruption in one single iteration. The disruption is assumed as a rail track blockage between Zurich HB and Zurich Oerlikon via both Zurich Wipkingen and Zurich Hardbrucke. One benchmark of agents’ behaviours without disruption and other three scenarios based on different information are simulated. Statistic results are analysed for all the agents who may be involved in the defined disruption. Agents’ flow in related transit routes and transport modes shows their adaptations to the corresponding information availability. Agents’ delays and scores reveal that information significantly impacts agents’ satisfaction in public transport disruption.

[1]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Social Media Use during Unplanned Transit Network Disruptions: A Review of Literature , 2014 .

[2]  Maria Poulopoulou,et al.  Active traffic management in urban areas: Is it effective for professional drivers? The case of variable message signs , 2019 .

[3]  Otto Anker Nielsen,et al.  Modelling Railway-Induced Passenger Delays in Multi-Modal Public Transport Networks: An Agent-Based Copenhagen Case Study Using Empirical Train Delay Data , 2018 .

[4]  Oded Cats,et al.  Exposing the role of exposure: Public transport network risk analysis , 2016 .

[5]  Mark Wardman,et al.  The impact of planned disruptions on rail passenger demand , 2018, Transportation.

[6]  Francesco Corman,et al.  Assessment of advanced dispatching measures for recovering disrupted railway situations , 2012 .

[7]  Becky P.Y. Loo,et al.  Transport resilience: The Occupy Central Movement in Hong Kong from another perspective , 2017 .

[8]  Paul Bouman Passengers, Crowding and Complexity : Models for passenger oriented public transport , 2017 .

[9]  Ryuji Tsuchiya,et al.  Route-Choice Support System for Passengers in the Face of Unexpected Disturbance of Train Operations , 2006 .

[10]  Karl Kottenhoff,et al.  Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: effects on customers , 2007 .

[11]  Gunnar Flötteröd,et al.  Agent-Based Traffic Assignment , 2016 .

[12]  O. Cats,et al.  Recovery time and propagation effects of passenger transport disruptions , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[13]  Otto Anker Nielsen,et al.  Multimodal route choice models of public transport passengers in the Greater Copenhagen Area , 2017, EURO J. Transp. Logist..

[14]  Kai Nagel,et al.  Increased Convergence Rates in Multiagent Transport Simulations with Pseudosimulation , 2013 .

[15]  Konrad Meister,et al.  Contribution to Agent-Based Demand Optimization in a Multi-Agent Transport Simulation , 2011 .

[16]  Davy Janssens,et al.  The effects of social networks on choice set dynamics: Results of numerical simulations using an agent-based approach , 2011 .

[17]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Modeling Impacts of Weather Conditions in Agent-Based Transport Microsimulations , 2014 .

[18]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Effect of Real-Time Transit Information on Dynamic Path Choice of Passengers , 2011 .

[19]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Developing a passive GPS tracking system to study long-term travel behavior , 2019 .

[20]  Leo G. Kroon,et al.  Passenger Advice and Rolling Stock Rescheduling Under Uncertainty for Disruption Management , 2018, Transp. Sci..

[21]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Passengers’ Perception of and Behavioral Adaptation to Unreliability in Public Transportation , 2013 .

[22]  Kai Nagel,et al.  Within-Day Replanning , 2016 .

[23]  Nicolas Lefebvre,et al.  MATSim-T , 2009, Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation Engineering.

[24]  Leo G. Kroon,et al.  Rescheduling of Railway Rolling Stock with Dynamic Passenger Flows , 2010, Transp. Sci..

[25]  Alan Borning,et al.  Where Is My Bus? Impact of mobile real-time information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders , 2011 .

[26]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  SimMobility Mid-Term Simulator: A State of the Art Integrated Agent Based Demand and Supply Model , 2015 .

[27]  M. E. Williams,et al.  TRANSIMS: TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION SYSTEM , 1995 .

[28]  Sonia Adelé,et al.  Exploring the behavior of suburban train users in the event of disruptions , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[29]  Mark D. Hickman,et al.  Transit Service and Path Choice Models in Stochastic and Time-Dependent Networks , 1997, Transp. Sci..

[30]  Tim Ryley,et al.  The impact of extreme weather conditions on long distance travel behaviour , 2015 .

[31]  Otto Anker Nielsen,et al.  User perspectives in public transport timetable optimisation , 2014 .

[32]  Luis Cadarso,et al.  Smooth and Controlled Recovery Planning of Disruptions in Rapid Transit Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[33]  Francesco Corman,et al.  A review of online dynamic models and algorithms for railway traffic control , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation Proceedings.

[34]  Sara Hernandez,et al.  Analysis of satisfaction factors at urban transport interchanges: Measuring travellers’ attitudes to information, security and waiting , 2017, Transport Policy.

[35]  K. Nagel,et al.  Generating complete all-day activity plans with genetic algorithms , 2005 .