'Excess Entry, Ambiguity Seeking, and Competence: An Experimental Investigation'

Excess entry refers to the high failure rate of new entrepreneurial ventures. Economic explanations suggest 'hit and run' entrants and risk-seeking behavior. A psychological explanation is that people (entrepreneurs) are overconfident in their abilities (Camerer & Lovallo, 1999). Characterizing entry decisions as ambiguous gambles, we alternatively suggest–following Heath and Tversky (1991)–that people seek ambiguity when the source of uncertainty is related to their competence. Overconfidence, as such, plays no role. This hypothesis is confirmed in an experimental study that also documents the phenomenon of reference group neglect. Finally, we emphasize the utility that people gain from engaging in activities that contribute to a sense of competence. This is an important force in economic activity that deserves more explicit attention.

[1]  Reinhard Selten,et al.  Bounded rational behavior in experimental games and markets : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Experimental Economics, Bielefeld, West Germany, September 21-25, 1986 , 1988 .

[2]  D. Storey,et al.  NEW FIRM FORMATION—A LABOUR MARKET APPROACH TO INDUSTRIAL ENTRY* , 1987 .

[3]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Individual strategies in a market entry game , 1995 .

[4]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity , 1992 .

[5]  Joachim Schwalbach,et al.  Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison , 1991 .

[6]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. , 1978 .

[7]  Jack B. Soll,et al.  Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[8]  P. Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, European Journal of Operational Research.

[9]  John C. Hause,et al.  Entry, Industry Growth, and the Microdynamics of Industry Supply , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  W. Dennis,et al.  More than you think: An inclusive estimate of business entries , 1997 .

[11]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Ambiguity seeking as a result of the status quo bias , 2005 .

[12]  D. Ellsberg.  Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[13]  J. Sutton.  Market Structure: The Bounds Approach 1 , 2002 .

[14]  JOHN COHEN,et al.  Preferences for Different Combinations of Chance and Skill in Gambling , 1959, Nature.

[15]  Z. Shapira.  Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective , 1995 .

[16]  Bill Broyles.  Notes , 1907, The Classical Review.

[17]  R. W. White.  Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. , 1959, Psychological review.

[18]  D. Shapiro,et al.  The determinants of new plant entry in canada , 1986 .

[19]  Craig R. Fox,et al.  Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance , 1995 .

[20]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[21]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Risk, ambiguity, and insurance , 1989 .

[22]  Justin Kruger,et al.  The influence of egocentrism and focalism on people's optimism in competitions: when what affects us equally affects me more. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  R. Hogarth.  Evaluating management education , 1979 .

[24]  R. Thaler,et al.  Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice , 1990 .

[25]  P. Gorecki,et al.  The determinants of entry by new and diversifying enterprises in the UK manufacturing sector 1958–1963: some tentative results , 1975 .

[26]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  The Discounting of Ambiguous Information in Economic Decision Making , 2003 .

[27]  A. Bandura,et al.  Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Sylvia Beyer,et al.  Gender Differences in Seff-Perceptions: Convergent Evidence from Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias , 1997 .

[29]  I. Welch,et al.  On the Evolution of Overconfidence and Entrepreneurs , 2001 .

[30]  Anne Marie Knott,et al.  Entrepreneurial Risk and Market Entry , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[31]  J. Kruger.  Lake Wobegon be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Rosedith Sitgreaves Bowker.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences , 1983 .

[33]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[34]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach , 1999 .

[35]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Entrepreneurs' perceived chances for success , 1988 .

[37]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1983 .

[38]  B. Schwartz.  The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less , 2004 .

[39]  N. Jianakoplos,et al.  ARE WOMEN MORE RISK AVERSE , 1998 .

[40]  Elena Reutskaja,et al.  Satisfaction in Choice as a Function of the Number of Alternatives: When Goods Satiate But Bads Escalate , 2005 .

[41]  D. Orr,et al.  The Determinants of Entry: A Sudy of the Canadian Manufacturing Industries , 1974 .

[42]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[43]  Franco Malerba,et al.  The Dynamics and Evolution of Industries , 1996 .

[44]  R. Merton.  The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy , 1948 .

[45]  Urs Fischbacher,et al.  Z-Tree ? Experimenter?S Manual , 1999 .

[46]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Small-Firm Entry in U.S. Manufacturing , 1989 .

[47]  P. Juslin.  The Overconfidence Phenomenon as a Consequence of Informal Experimenter-Guided Selection of Almanac Items , 1994 .

[48]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[49]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Shattering the Illusion of Control: Multi-shot Versus Single-Shot Gambles , 1994 .

[50]  Ido Erev,et al.  Equilibrium Play in Large Group Market Entry Games , 1998 .

[51]  P. Geroski.  What do we know about entry , 1995 .

[52]  S. Parker.  A Time Series Model of Self-Employment under Uncertainty , 1996 .

[53]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS: A PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE , 1988 .

[54]  O. Svenson.  ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .

[55]  P. A. Geroski,et al.  Entry and industry evolution: the UK car industry, 1958—83 , 1991 .

[56]  Richard A. Highfield,et al.  New business starts and economic activity: An empirical investigation , 1987 .

[57]  A. Tversky,et al.  Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty , 1991 .

[58]  R. Selten,et al.  Experimental Evidence for Attractions to Chance , 2000 .

[59]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Do Entry Conditions Vary across Markets , 1987 .

[60]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Decision Making under Ambiguity , 1986 .

[61]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management , 1989 .