An optimization algorithm that incorporates IMRT delivery constraints.

An intensity-modulated beam optimization algorithm is presented which incorporates the delivery constraints into the optimization cycle. The optimization algorithm is based on the quasi-Newton method of iteratively solving minimization problems. The developed algorithm iteratively corrects the incident, pencil-beam-like, fluence to incorporate the delivery constraints. In the present study, the goal of the optimization algorithm is to achieve the best deliverable radiotherapy plan, subject to the constraints of the delivery technique described by a leaf-sequencing algorithm being applied concurrently. In general, if they are applied after, rather than during, the optimization cycle, the delivery constraints associated with the IMRT technique can produce local variations up to 6% in the 'optimized' dose (i.e., distribution without applied constraints) and reduce the degree of conformity, of the dose, to the PTV region. The optimization method has been applied to three IMRT delivery techniques: dynamic multileaf (DMLC), multiple-static-field (MSF) and slice-by-slice tomotherapy (NOMOS MIMiC). The beam profiles were generated for a prostate tumour with organs at risk being the rectum, bladder and femoral heads. The optimization method described was shown to generate optimum and deliverable IMRT plans for these three delivery techniques. In the case of the DMLC and MSF the optimization converged within 3-5 iterations to a mean PTV dose of 69.60 +/- 1.34 Gy and 69.71 +/- 1.34 Gy, respectively, while for NOMOS MIMiC approximately 10 iterations were needed to obtain 69.68 +/- 1.55 Gy. In addition to this, the IMRT optimization also yielded optimum fluence profiles when clustering was performed concurrently with the leaf-sequencer. An optimum between 8 and 15 clusters of equal fluence 'intensity' was shown to establish the best compromise between the number of fluence levels and the PTV dose coverage.

[1]  J. M. Wilkinson,et al.  The variation in output of symmetric, asymmetric and irregularly shaped wedged radiotherapy fields. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Methods of image reconstruction from projections applied to conformation radiotherapy. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  P S Cho,et al.  Hardware-sensitive optimization for intensity modulated radiotherapy. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  T W Holmes A method to incorporate leakage and head scatter corrections into a tomotherapy inverse treatment planning algorithm. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Joao Seco,et al.  Modelling the Effects of IMRT Delivery: Constraints and Incorporation of Beam Smoothing into Inverse Planning , 2000 .

[6]  M. Phillips,et al.  A macropencil beam model: clinical implementation for conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Realization and verification of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with modulated fields. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  S Webb,et al.  Analysis of the effects of the delivery technique on an IMRT plan: comparison for multiple static field, dynamic and NOMOS MIMiC collimation. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimization of stationary and moving beam radiation therapy techniques. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  J M Wilkinson,et al.  Tissue standard ratios for irregularly shaped radiotherapy fields. , 1990, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  J D Bourland,et al.  A finite-size pencil beam model for photon dose calculations in three dimensions. , 1992, Medical physics.

[13]  T. Holmes,et al.  A comparison of three inverse treatment planning algorithms. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  M Oldham,et al.  The optimization and inherent limitations of 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment plans of the prostate. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  P R Storchi,et al.  Optimization of multileaf collimator settings for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  F Nüsslin,et al.  A variable fluence step clustering and segmentation algorithm for step and shoot IMRT. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Steve Webb,et al.  Improving dosimetric accuracy of a dynamic MLC technique , 2000 .

[18]  S Webb,et al.  Generation of discrete beam-intensity modulation by dynamic multileaf collimation under minimum leaf separation constraints. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.