Objective Assessment of Sonographic Quality I: Task Information

In this paper, we explore relationships between the performance of the ideal observer and information-based measures of class separability in the context of sonographic breast-lesion diagnosis. This investigation was motivated by a finding that, since the test statistic of the ideal observer in sonography is a quadratic function of the echo data, it is not generally normally distributed. We found for some types of boundary discrimination tasks often required for sonographic lesion diagnosis, the deviation of the test statistic from a normal distribution can be significant. Hence the usual relationships between performance and information metrics become uncertain. Using Monte Carlo studies involving five common sonographic lesion-discrimination tasks, we found in each case that the detectability index dA2 from receiver operating characteristic analysis was well approximated by the Kullback-Leibler divergence J, a measure of clinical task information available from the recorded radio-frequency echo data. However, the lesion signal-to-noise ratio, SNRI2, calculated from moments of the ideal observer test statistic, consistently underestimates dA2 for high-contrast boundary discrimination tasks. Thus, in a companion paper, we established a relationship between image-quality properties of the imaging system and J in order to predict ideal performance. These relationships provide a rigorous basis for sonographic instrument evaluation and design.

[1]  F. Dunn,et al.  Letter: Correlation of echographic visualizability of tissue with biological composition and physiological state. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  M.F. Insana,et al.  Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Gray level transforms and lesion detectability in echographic images. , 1988, Ultrasonic imaging.

[4]  Jie Liu,et al.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks Simulating Malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[6]  R. Shaw,et al.  The Equivalent Quantum Efficiency of the Photographic Process , 1963 .

[7]  D. C. Barber,et al.  Medical Imaging-The Assessment of Image Quality , 1996 .

[8]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  H. Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Objective Assessment of Sonographic: Quality II Acquisition Information Spectrum , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  John Bowman Thomas,et al.  An introduction to statistical communication theory , 1969 .

[12]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Sensitivity of Radiologic, CT, Nuclear Medicine, and Ultrasound Medical Imaging Systems , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Huaiyu Zhu On Information and Sufficiency , 1997 .

[14]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[15]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[16]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Evgueni A. Haroutunian,et al.  Information Theory and Statistics , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[18]  Helmut Ermert,et al.  An ultrasound research interface for a clinical system. , 2006, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control.

[19]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[20]  J. Liu,et al.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks simulating malignant and benign breast lesions with ultrasound , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[21]  Robert F. Wagner,et al.  Quadratic Tasks And The Ideal Observer , 1987, Medical Imaging.

[22]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[23]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[24]  G E Trahey,et al.  A Quantitative Approach to Speckle Reduction via Frequency Compounding , 1986, Ultrasonic imaging.

[25]  Nghia Q. Nguyen,et al.  Optimal beamforming in ultrasound using the ideal observer , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  An Adaptive Filter to Approximate the Bayesian Strategy for Sonographic Beamforming , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  H. Ermert,et al.  An ultrasound research interface for a clinical system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[28]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Fundamental correlation lengths of coherent speckle in medical ultrasonic images , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[30]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[31]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.