Parametric analysis and systems design of dynamic photovoltaic shading modules

Shading systems improve building energy performance and occupant comfort by controlling glare, natural lighting, and solar gain. Integrating PV (photovoltaics) in shading systems opens new opportunities for BIPV (building integrated photovoltaics) on facades. A key problem of such systems is mutual shading among PV modules as it can lead to electrical mismatch losses and overheating effects. In this work, we present a new modeling framework, which couples parametric 3D with high-resolution electrical modeling of thin-film PV modules to simulate electric energy yield of geometrically complex PV applications. The developed method is able to predict the shading pattern for individual PV modules with high spatio-temporal resolution, which is of great importance for electrical system design. The methodology is applied to evaluate the performance of different dynamic BIPV shading system configurations, as well as its sensitivity to facade orientation and module arrangement. The analysis shows, that there is a trade-off between tracking performance and mutual shading of modules. Distance between modules is a critical parameter influencing the amount of mutual shading and hence limiting solar irradiation and electricity generation of PV shading systems using solar tracking. Planning of module string configuration, PV cell orientation, and location of bypass diodes according to partial shading conditions, reduces electrical mismatch losses and results in significantly higher electricity generation. The integration of parametric 3D and electrical modeling opens new possibilities for PV system design and dynamic control optimization. Though the analysis focuses on BIPV, the method is useful for the planning and operation of solar tracking systems in general.

[1]  Heinrich Häberlin Photovoltaics: System Design and Practice , 2012 .

[2]  E. Karatepe,et al.  Development of a suitable model for characterizing photovoltaic arrays with shaded solar cells , 2007 .

[3]  E. Dunlop,et al.  Comparison of potential solar electricity output from fixed‐inclined and two‐axis tracking photovoltaic modules in Europe , 2008 .

[4]  Kashif Ishaque,et al.  A review of maximum power point tracking techniques of PV system for uniform insolation and partial shading condition , 2013 .

[5]  Luis Narvarte,et al.  Tracking and back‐tracking , 2011 .

[6]  P. Denholm,et al.  Relative performance of tracking versus fixed tilt photovoltaic systems in the USA , 2013 .

[7]  Eduard Muljadi,et al.  Determination of the optimal configuration for a photovoltaic array depending on the shading condition , 2013 .

[8]  Prageeth Jayathissa,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Energy Performance, and Construction of the Adaptive Solar Façade , 2015 .

[9]  P. Spirito,et al.  Reverse bias power dissipation of shadowed or faulty cells in different array configurations , 1982 .

[10]  O. Trescases,et al.  A General Approach for Quantifying the Benefit of Distributed Power Electronics for Fine Grained MPPT in Photovoltaic Applications Using 3-D Modeling , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[11]  E. Lorenzo,et al.  Tracking and Ground Cover Ratio , 2008 .

[12]  Hugo Capdevila,et al.  High resolution shading modeling and performance simulation of sun-tracking photovoltaic systems , 2013 .

[13]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  DIVA 2.0: INTEGRATING DAYLIGHT AND THERMAL SIMULATIONS USING RHINOCEROS 3D, DAYSIM AND ENERGYPLUS , 2011 .

[14]  Mustapha Koussa,et al.  Measured and modelled improvement in solar energy yield from flat plate photovoltaic systems utilizing different tracking systems and under a range of environmental conditions , 2011 .

[15]  Nuri Gokmen,et al.  A virtual reality study of surrounding obstacles on BIPV systems for estimation of long-term performance of partially shaded PV arrays , 2013 .

[16]  J. M. Ruíz,et al.  Analysis and modelling the reverse characteristic of photovoltaic cells , 2006 .

[17]  J. Sites,et al.  Impact of sheet resistance on 2-D modeling of thin-film solar cells , 2009 .

[18]  Vincenzo d'Alessandro,et al.  An automated high-granularity tool for a fast evaluation of the yield of PV plants accounting for shading effects , 2015 .

[19]  Syafaruddin,et al.  A comprehensive MATLAB Simulink PV system simulator with partial shading capability based on two-diode model , 2011 .

[20]  O. Perpiñán,et al.  Cost of energy and mutual shadows in a two-axis tracking PV system , 2012 .

[21]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Façade–integrated photovoltaics: a life cycle and performance assessment case study , 2012 .

[22]  Zoltán Nagy,et al.  Experimental Characterization of a 2-DOF Soft Robotic Platform for Architectural Applications , 2014, RSS 2014.

[23]  Muhammad Ashraful Alam,et al.  Performance and Reliability Implications of Two-Dimensional Shading in Monolithic Thin-Film Photovoltaic Modules , 2013, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[24]  Greg Humphreys,et al.  Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation , 2004 .

[25]  V. Agarwal,et al.  MATLAB-Based Modeling to Study the Effects of Partial Shading on PV Array Characteristics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[26]  J. M. Ruiz,et al.  Computer simulation of shading effects in photovoltaic arrays , 2006 .

[27]  H. Manz,et al.  Available remodeling simulation for a BIPV as a shading device , 2011 .

[28]  David Moreno Sperling,et al.  Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures. The Next City - New Technologies and the Future of the Built Environment , 2015, Communications in Computer and Information Science.

[29]  H. Outhred,et al.  Analysis and control of mismatch power loss in photovoltaic arrays , 1995 .

[30]  Chris Deline,et al.  A simplified model of uniform shading in large photovoltaic arrays , 2013 .

[31]  J. W. Bishop Computer simulation of the effects of electrical mismatches in photovoltaic cell interconnection circuits , 1988 .

[32]  V. Quaschning,et al.  Numerical simulation of current-voltage characteristics of photovoltaic systems with shaded solar cells , 1996 .

[33]  Jari Leppaaho,et al.  Operation of series‐connected silicon‐based photovoltaic modules under partial shading conditions , 2012 .

[34]  Eduardo Lorenzo,et al.  Partial shadowing, MPPT performance and inverter configurations: observations at tracking PV plants , 2008 .

[35]  A. Mermoud Optimization of Row-Arrangement in PV Systems, Shading Loss Evaluations According to Module Positioning and Connexions , 2012 .

[36]  S. Ahmadi,et al.  A PSO‐based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems under environmental and partially shaded conditions , 2015 .

[37]  Aaron Paul Brakke,et al.  Dynamic Façades and Computation: Towards an Inclusive Categorization of High Performance Kinetic Façade Systems , 2015 .

[38]  P. Guerriero,et al.  Dynamic electrothermal simulation of photovoltaic plants , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP).

[39]  Muhammad A. Alam,et al.  Geometrical design of thin film photovoltaic modules for improved shade tolerance and performance , 2015 .

[40]  Theocharis Tsoutsos,et al.  Assessment of fixed shading devices with integrated PV for efficient energy use , 2012 .

[41]  Arno Schlueter,et al.  Adaptive Distributed Robotics for Environmental Performance, Occupant Comfort and Architectural Expression , 2012 .

[42]  Seung-Ho Yoo,et al.  Efficiency characteristic of building integrated photovoltaics as a shading device , 2002 .

[43]  Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro,et al.  Optimal displacement of photovoltaic array’s rows using a novel shading model , 2015 .

[44]  Huan-Liang Tsai Insolation-oriented model of photovoltaic module using Matlab/Simulink , 2010 .

[45]  E. Diaz-Dorado,et al.  Optimal distribution for photovoltaic solar trackers to minimize power losses caused by shadows , 2011 .

[46]  André Mermoud,et al.  Performance Assessment of a Simulation Model for PV Modules of Any Available Technology , 2010 .

[47]  Eleonora Riva Sanseverino,et al.  Reconfigurable electrical interconnection strategies for photovoltaic arrays: A review , 2014 .