Ontology Matching for Socio-Cyberphysical Systems: An Approach Based on Background Knowledge

Nowadays there are exist many ontology matching methods mostly based on using context and content in various combinations. The accuracy of existing methods can be increased by using the background knowledge – an external reference knowledge that can facilitate the matching process. The paper proposes an approach for automated matching of elements (fragments) of the ontologies based on the combination of existed ontology matching methods (pattern and context-based), neural network matching and additional control by community-driven matching. All of them are using the background knowledge to get additional information that helps to find more precise correspondence between ontologies concepts. Also, the background knowledge helps to explain result of ontology matching to the user, which is going to check the correspondence manually. In addition, the paper proposes an architecture of ontology matching service that is built based on the presented approach. The service is used for providing semantic interoperability in socio-cyberphysical systems.

[1]  Margaret-Anne D. Storey,et al.  A Cognitive Support Framework for Ontology Mapping , 2007, ISWC/ASWC.

[2]  Zohra Bellahsene,et al.  Selecting Optimal Background Knowledge Sources for the Ontology Matching Task , 2016, EKAW.

[3]  Alexander V. Smirnov,et al.  Patterns for context-based knowledge fusion in decision support systems , 2015, Inf. Fusion.

[4]  Karl Hammar Ontology Design Patterns in WebProtege , 2015, International Semantic Web Conference.

[5]  K. Saruladha,et al.  COGOM: Cognitive Theory Based Ontology Matching System , 2016 .

[6]  Vojtech Svátek,et al.  Mapping structural design patterns in OWL to ontological background models , 2013, K-CAP.

[7]  Margaret-Anne D. Storey,et al.  Towards Understanding the Needs of Cognitive Support for Ontology Mapping , 2006, Ontology Matching.

[8]  Pavel Shvaiko,et al.  Community-Driven Ontology Matching , 2006, ESWC.

[9]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Machine Learning Approach for Instance Matching Based on Similarity Metrics , 2012, SEMWEB.

[10]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Exploiting the structure of background knowledge used , 2006 .

[11]  Chantal Reynaud,et al.  Pattern-Based Mapping Refinement , 2010, EKAW.

[12]  Paul W. Munro,et al.  Ontology Mapping Neural Network: An Approach to Learning and Inferring Correspondences among Ontologies , 2010, ISWC Posters&Demos.

[13]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching: State of the Art and Future Challenges , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[14]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Discovering Missing Background Knowledge in Ontology Matching , 2006, ECAI.

[15]  François Scharffe,et al.  Ontology alignment design patterns , 2013, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[16]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Ten Challenges for Ontology Matching , 2008, OTM Conferences.

[17]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Correspondence Patterns for Ontology Alignment , 2008, EKAW.

[18]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Using multiple ontologies as background knowledge in ontology matching , 2008 .

[19]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Exploiting the Structure of Background Knowledge Used in Ontology Matching , 2006, Ontology Matching.

[20]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Towards design patterns for ontology alignment , 2008, SAC '08.

[21]  Zohra Bellahsene,et al.  Light-Weight Cross-Lingual Ontology Matching with LYAM++ , 2015, OTM Conferences.