Permanent prostate brachytherapy preplanned technique: The modern Seattle method step-by-step and dosimetric outcomes.

PURPOSE To describe, step-by-step, the current Seattle preplan technique, and report the dosimetric outcomes on 1,131 consecutively such treated prostate brachytherapy patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS One thousand one hundred thirty one patients with prostate cancer were treated with iodine-125 ((125)I), palladium-103 ((103)Pd), or cesium-131 ((131)Cs) using a preplanned template-guided transrectal ultrasound-guided approach between January 2005 and August 2007. Day one computed tomography (CT) scans were taken for postimplantation dose-volume histogram evaluations. Postoperative prostate contours were drawn by one author (DN) on CT images taken on postoperative day one. RESULTS The volume of prostate receiving 100% of prescription dose (V(100)) and percent dose to 90% of the prostate (%D(90)) were 95% and 106% for 558 monotherapy (125)I implants, 91% and 102% for 327 (103)Pd implants, and 97% and 111.5% for 13 (131)Cs implants, respectively. The median V(100) and percent D(90) were 91% and 101% for five boost (125)I implants, 92% and 104% for 228 boost (103)Pd implants. The median rectal volume receiving 100% of prescription dose (RV(100)) for (125)I, (103)Pd, and (131)Cs monotherapy implants were 0.3, 0.13, and 0.38cc, and for (125)I and (103)Pd boost implants were 0.16 and 0.13cc, respectively. No patient received an RV(100) of >0.92cc. CONCLUSIONS Modern preplanned template and ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy can consistently result in excellent prostate dosimetry and rectal sparing.

[1]  P. Scardino,et al.  Poorly differentiated prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: long-term outcome and incidence of pathological downgrading. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[2]  R. Stock,et al.  A dose-response study for I-125 prostate implants. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  K. Wallner,et al.  Dosimetric and radiographic correlates to prostate brachytherapy‐related rectal complications , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[4]  G. Pond,et al.  Rectal-wall dose dependence on postplan timing after permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  J. Blasko,et al.  Ten-year biochemical relapse-free survival after external beam radiation and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: the Seattle experience. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J. Blasko,et al.  Interstitial implantation techniques in prostate cancer , 1997, Journal of surgical oncology.

[7]  W Cavanagh,et al.  Palladium-103 brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Adam P Dicker,et al.  Probability of late rectal morbidity in 125I prostate brachytherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Marco Zaider,et al.  Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  L. Potters,et al.  Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy? , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  J. Blasko,et al.  Ten-year biochemical relapse-free survival functions following brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer: the Seattle experience , 2002 .

[12]  R. Stock,et al.  A modified technique allowing interactive ultrasound-guided three-dimensional transperineal prostate implantation. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  H. Holm,et al.  Transperineal 125iodine seed implantation in prostatic cancer guided by transrectal ultrasonography. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Blasko,et al.  10-year biochemical (prostate-specific antigen) control of prostate cancer with (125)I brachytherapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  A. Partin,et al.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. , 2001, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[16]  L. Potters,et al.  A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  K. Wallner,et al.  Impact of supplemental external beam radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy on biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Christopher A Peters,et al.  A genetically determined dose-volume histogram predicts for rectal bleeding among patients treated with prostate brachytherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  M. Terris,et al.  Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10 , 2006, Cancer.

[20]  D. Yan,et al.  Clinicopathologic analysis of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: should the clinical target volume be expanded posterolaterally to account for microscopic extension? , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  William J Catalona,et al.  Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. , 2004, The Journal of urology.