Effects of High Fidelity Modeling of Multirotor Drones

This paper examines two different factors that will affect energy consumption for multi-rotor drones with more than four rotors. First, the choice of aerodynamic model for the rotor blades is examined. Two aerodynamic models, the blade element theory (BET) model and lumped blade (LB) model, are compared using vertical, roll, pitch, and yaw trajectories. The BET and LB models produced very different trajectories with identical inputs, especially in the vertical and yaw trajectories which differed by 87.9% and 52.5%, respectively. The BET and LB models also result in different energy usages with the LB model consistently predicting 36% more energy consumption. The second factor studied is the choice of rotor groupings. For a multi-rotor drone, different rotor groupings may result in different energy usages; two groupings are considered. The same four basic trajectories are compared. The results show that the two groupings have an energy difference of 4.7–4.9% for each of the roll, pitch, and yaw directions which implies that each grouping has a base energy consumption inherent to it. Then, possible energy compounding effects are explored by examining a complex trajectory. The complex trajectory yields a 9.26% energy difference between the two groupings but further examination reveals that the difference is due to differences in the final trajectory not energy compounding effects. Thus, it is concluded that the aerodynamic model and rotor groupings are two important factors that must be considered when energy consumption needs to be minimized.

[1]  Raffaello D'Andrea,et al.  Relaxed hover solutions for multicopters: Application to algorithmic redundancy and novel vehicles , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  Dennis S. Bernstein,et al.  Adaptive control of a quadrotor UAV transporting a cable-suspended load with unknown mass , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  Oscar Oscarson Design, Modeling and Control of an Octocopter , 2015 .

[4]  Claire J. Tomlin,et al.  Precision flight control for a multi-vehicle quadrotor helicopter testbed , 2011 .

[5]  Rafael Fierro,et al.  Cable-suspended load lifting by a quadrotor UAV: hybrid model, trajectory generation, and control , 2017, Auton. Robots.

[6]  Alberto Aliseda,et al.  Analysis of High Fidelity Modeling of Drone Dynamics and Aerodynamics for Reduced Energy Consumption , 2020 .

[7]  Farhan Gandhi,et al.  Trim Analysis of a Classical Octocopter After Single-Rotor Failure , 2018, 2018 AIAA/IEEE Electric Aircraft Technologies Symposium (EATS).

[8]  Aaron McFadyen,et al.  Multi-rotor with suspended load: System Dynamics and Control Toolbox , 2015, 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[9]  Manuel C. Ramos,et al.  Modeling and Implementation of Quadcopter Autonomous Flight Based on Alternative Methods to Determine Propeller Parameters , 2020, ArXiv.

[10]  Philippe Martin,et al.  The role of propeller aerodynamics in the model of a quadrotor UAV , 2009, 2009 European Control Conference (ECC).

[11]  Mark W. Mueller,et al.  Modeling of aerodynamic disturbances for proximity flight of multirotors , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[12]  Daewon Lee,et al.  Geometric control of a quadrotor UAV transporting a payload connected via flexible cable , 2014, 1407.8164.

[13]  Michael Achtelik,et al.  Design of a flexible high performance quadcopter platform breaking the MAV endurance record with laser power beaming , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  José Manuel Andújar Márquez,et al.  Intelligent UAV Map Generation and Discrete Path Planning for Search and Rescue Operations , 2018, Complex..

[15]  Naira Hovakimyan,et al.  Robust Adaptive Control Allocation for an Octocopter under Actuator Faults , 2016 .

[16]  Rogelio Lozano,et al.  Swing-attenuation for a quadrotor transporting a cable-suspended payload. , 2017, ISA transactions.

[17]  Ivan Bratko,et al.  Learning to Control a Quadcopter Qualitatively , 2020, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[18]  Xin Su,et al.  Evolutionary Games in the Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Information System: A Multiagent Simulation Approach , 2018, Complex..

[19]  Tor Arne Johansen,et al.  Nonlinear Control with Swing Damping of a Multirotor UAV with Suspended Load , 2017, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[20]  Rogelio Lozano,et al.  Quadrotor Energy-Based Control Laws: a Unit-Quaternion Approach , 2017, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[21]  Lydia Tapia,et al.  Continuous action reinforcement learning for control-affine systems with unknown dynamics , 2014, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica.

[22]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Multirotor Aerial Vehicles: Modeling, Estimation, and Control of Quadrotor , 2012, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.