Contribution of morphology discrimination algorithm for improving rhythm discrimination in slow and fast ventricular tachycardia zones in dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

AIMS Morphology discrimination (MD) is an algorithm based on QRS morphology analysis, that can be used alone or in various combinations with other discriminators in order to diagnose ventricular tachycardia (VT) [the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may be set to diagnose VT if 'Any' or 'All' the discriminators indicate VT)]. METHODS AND RESULTS We evaluated the contribution of MD in terms of Specificity (SP) and Sensitivity (SE) of rhythm discrimination in slow and fast VT zones (rates <150 bpm and between 150 and 180 bpm, respectively). Detection results (682 spontaneous episodes in 58 patients) were corrected for multiple episodes within a patient (generalized estimating equations method). Rhythm discrimination in slow VT zones was characterized by SE and SP below 80% without MD, while the use of MD alone allowed to enhance SP, maintaining SE at 96%. Use of MD in combination with other discriminators resulted in a decrease in SP (setting 'Any'). In fast VT zones, MD allows an increase in SE for VT detection from around 82% up to approximately 94%, coupled with an SP of 95-96%., although SP is much higher with MD alone (94.8%) than with any other combination (78.4%). Both in slow and fast VT zones, use of multiple discriminators with the setting 'All' resulted in an unacceptable decrease in SE. CONCLUSION MD in a dual-chamber ICD in combination with a rate branch classification system makes it possible to achieve a very high SP in discriminating detected events both in slow and fast VT zones, while maintaining SE for VT detection.

[1]  M. Borggrefe,et al.  Clinical experience with antitachycardia pacing and improved detection algorithms in a new implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  S. Higgins,et al.  Stability: An ICD Detection Criterion for Discriminating Atrial Fibrillation From Ventricular Tachycardia , 1995, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  M. Schlepper,et al.  Programmable VT Detection Enhancements in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[4]  A. Schaumann,et al.  Enhanced detection criteria in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to avoid inappropriate therapy. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  J. Brugada,et al.  Enhanced Detection Criteria in Implantable Defibrillators , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of the Initial Use of Stability and Onset Criteria in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  V. Kühlkamp,et al.  Clinical Experience with the New Detection Algorithms for Atrial Fibrillation of a Defibrillator with Dual Chamber Sensing and Pacing , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  J. Brugada Is inappropriate therapy a resolved issue with current implantable cardioverter defibrillators? , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  T. Lüscher,et al.  The Potential for Inappropriate Ventricular Tachycardia Confirmation Using the Intracardiac Electrogram (EGM) Width Criterion , 1999, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  D. Baensch,et al.  Ventricular tachycardias above the initially programmed tachycardia detection interval in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: incidence, prediction and significance. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  G. Hasenfuss,et al.  Long‐Term Clinical Experience with the EGM Width Detection Criterion for Differentiation of Supraventricular and Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2000, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[12]  M. Rahn-Schönbeck,et al.  Morphology Discriminator Feature for Enhanced Ventricular Tachycardia Discrimination in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2000, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  H. Wellens,et al.  Dual Chamber Arrhythmia Detection in the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  Jeffrey M. Gillberg,et al.  Critical analysis of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator arrhythmia detection : results and technical considerations. , 2001 .

[15]  C. Schmitt,et al.  Do Current Dual Chamber Cardioverter Defibrillators Have Advantages Over Conventional Single Chamber Cardioverter Defibrillators in Reducing Inappropriate Therapies? A Randomized, Prospective Study , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[16]  A. Galati,et al.  Electrogram Width Parameter Analysis in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Influence of Body Position and Electrode Configuration , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  R. Vonthein,et al.  Enhanced Detection Criteria in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Sensitivity and Specificity of the Stability Algorithm at Different Heart Rates , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[18]  G. Boriani,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Morphology Discrimination: An Algorithm for Rhythm Discrimination in Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[19]  Angelo Branzi,et al.  Combined Use of Morphology Discrimination, Sudden Onset, and Stability as Discriminating Algorithms in Single Chamber Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[20]  G. Boriani,et al.  Rhythm Discrimination by Rate Branch and QRS Morphology in Dual Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2003, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[21]  M. Niebauer,et al.  Clinical Investigation of a New Dual‐Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with Improved Rhythm Discrimination Capabilities , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[22]  Alain Ripart,et al.  Arrhythmia detection by dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators. A review of current algorithms. , 2004, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[23]  S. Hohnloser,et al.  The 1+1 Trial: A Prospective Trial of a Dual- Versus a Single-Chamber Implantable Defibrillator in Patients With Slow Ventricular Tachycardias , 2004, Circulation.

[24]  Michael O. Sweeney,et al.  Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial of Empirical Antitachycardia Pacing Versus Shocks for Spontaneous Rapid Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Pacing Fast Ventricular Tachycardia Reduces Shock Therapies (PainFREE Rx II) Trial Results , 2004, Circulation.

[25]  B. Wilkoff,et al.  Optimal Combination of Discriminators for Differentiating Ventricular from Supraventricular Tachycardia by Dual‐Chamber Defibrillators , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[26]  W. Bamlet,et al.  Dual-Chamber Versus Single-Chamber Detection Enhancements for Implantable Defibrillator Rhythm Diagnosis: The Detect Supraventricular Tachycardia Study , 2006, Circulation.

[27]  Dick M. Goedhart,et al.  Evaluation of morphology discrimination for ventricular tachycardia diagnosis in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[28]  L. Jordaens,et al.  Prevention of inappropriate therapy in implantable defibrillators: A meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing single-chamber and dual-chamber arrhythmia discrimination algorithms. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.