Theories of technological innovation as useful tools for corporate strategy

Three theories of technology and innovation; the product-process concept, the meta-learning concept, and the concept of technological interdependence, are used to relate technology and innovation to strategic management. This paper attempts to identify complementary and unifying concepts in these theories, which are useful to strategic planners. Performance indicators, from the commercial airline industry, are used to illustrate how theoretical assumptions can be related to practical applications. Type of innovation, stage of development, learning at all levels, interdependence between technologies, and users' expectations all appear to play a role in the emergence of technologies and the rate of innovation.

[1]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[2]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  Technical change, competition and vertical integration , 1986 .

[3]  R. D. Sibbernsen.  What arbitrators think about technology replacing labor , 1986 .

[4]  R. Reagan.  Why this is an entrepreneurial age , 1985 .

[5]  A. Cooper,et al.  Survivors of industry shake-outs: The case of the U.S. color television set industry , 1985 .

[6]  Lawrence C. Rhyne.  The relationship of information usage characteristics to planning system sophistication: An empirical examination , 1985 .

[7]  M. Hitt,et al.  Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance , 1985 .

[8]  P. Stone,et al.  Your office is where you are , 1985 .

[9]  A. L. Frohman,et al.  Putting Technology into Strategic Planning , 1985 .

[10]  C. Smart,et al.  Strategy and the environment: A study of corporate responses to crises , 1984 .

[11]  J. E. Butler,et al.  The History of Progress Functions as a Managerial Technology , 1984, Business History Review.

[12]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[13]  Russell I. Fries,et al.  Patterns of Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[14]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Business Unit Strategy and Changes in the Product R&D Budget , 1983 .

[15]  D. Schendel,et al.  An empirical analysis of strategy types , 1983 .

[16]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[17]  R. Kanter.  The middle manager as innovator. , 1982, Harvard business review.

[18]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Technical change in the commercial aircraft industry, 1925–1975 , 1981 .

[19]  S. Fn.  'Invisible' resource: women for boards. , 1980 .

[20]  John W. Zimmerman,et al.  Scanning the International Environment , 1979 .

[21]  E. H. Neilsen,et al.  The subordinate's predicaments. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[22]  J. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[23]  Jeffrey G. Williamson,et al.  Optimal Replacement of Capital Goods: The Early New England and British Textile Firm , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  A. Alchian.  Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production , 1963 .

[25]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[26]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Economic Sources of Inventive Activity , 1962, The Journal of Economic History.

[27]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[28]  M. Yasai-Ardekani,et al.  Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: Findings in 48 U.K. companies , 1986 .

[29]  B. Babbitt.  The States and the Reindustrialization of America. , 1984 .

[30]  Steven Wright.  Manufacturing strategy: Defining the missing link , 1984 .

[31]  J. Elster.  Explaining Technical Change , 1983 .

[32]  Jeffrey R. Williams.  Technological evolution and competitive response , 1983 .

[33]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[34]  H. Asher.  Cost-quantity relationships in the airframe industry , 1956 .