Dominant physical controls on hourly flow predictions and the role of spatial variability: Mahurangi catchment, New Zealand

We present a systematic approach to the development of models for making hourly flow predictions, where each step provides insight into the relative importance of catchment and climatic properties (rainfall, soil properties, vegetation, topography), their spatial variability, and their influence on temporal flow variability at the outlet. Our modelling approach uses a simple conceptual model design requiring minimal calibration and physically meaningful input parameters estimated a priori from landscape data or from analyses of streamflow recession curves. The model structure allows direct measurement of parameter uncertainty and the ability to investigate its propagation through the model to produce bounds of predictive uncertainty via the Monte Carlo method. This method was applied to a number of model designs to assess the tradeoff between model complexity, accuracy and predictive uncertainty, and to identify the most appropriate model design under specific climatic conditions. With the preferred model, sensitivity analysis was used to identify the dominant controls on streamflow variability at the hourly timescale. In summary the aim is not to present a distributed model of universal applicability, but to generate insights into the climate, soil and vegetation controls on streamflow variability at the hourly timescale, and on predictive accuracy and uncertainty, that can be used in future modelling efforts.

[1]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Climate, soil, and vegetation controls upon the variability of water balance in temperate and semiarid landscapes: Downward approach to water balance analysis , 2003 .

[2]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Watershed groundwater balance estimation using streamflow recession analysis and baseflow separation , 1999 .

[3]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of general circulation models' subgrid variability and patchiness of rainfall and soil moisture on land surface water balance fluxes , 1995 .

[4]  X. R. Liu,et al.  The Xinanjiang model. , 1995 .

[5]  M. Duncan Hydrological impacts of converting pasture and gorse to pine plantation, and forest harvesting, Nelson, New Zealand , 1995 .

[6]  V. Klemeš Conceptualization and scale in hydrology , 1983 .

[7]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Predicting space–time variability of hourly streamflow and the role of climate seasonality: Mahurangi Catchment, New Zealand , 2003 .

[8]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Performance of conceptual rainfall‐runoff models in low‐yielding ephemeral catchments , 1997 .

[9]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Modelling water balances in an Alpine catchment through exploitation of emergent properties over changing time scales , 2003 .

[10]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  A synthesis of space‐time variability in storm response: Rainfall, runoff generation, and routing , 1999 .

[11]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: downward approach to hydrological model development , 2001 .

[12]  R. Woods,et al.  Climate and landscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing timescales , 2002 .