Learning through conflict: a realistic strategy for risk communication

Technological conflicts are commonly seen as rooted in problems of risk perception and risk communication. This view is seriously deficient in that it does not fully appreciate that despite their technical content, the conflicts are at bottom political. Conflict of interests and values is evident even in differences over scientific agendas, methods, and interpretations, and especially in the inevitable cacophony of messages describing scientific knowledge to non-experts. Efforts to produce clear, accurate, and unbiased messages about risks will not even solve communication problems, let alone reduce conflict, because ‘unbiased’ is undefinable. Clear and accurate messages can always be devised to support a variety of policy positions, and they will be, whenever controversy persists. The article substantiates these points and outlines some realistic approaches to risk communication that enable nonexperts to learn through conflict what they cannot learn from carefully crafted risk messages.

[1]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: The case of environmental risk , 1989 .

[2]  L B Lave,et al.  Health and safety risk analyses: information for better decisions. , 1987, Science.

[3]  David Dickson,et al.  The New Politics of Science , 1984 .

[4]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  Creative Democracy: Systematic Conflict Resolution and Policymaking in a World of High Science and Technology , 1988 .

[5]  S. Schwartz.  Normative Influences on Altruism , 1977 .

[6]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judged frequency of lethal events , 1978 .

[7]  J. Habermas,et al.  Toward a rational society: Student protest, science and politics; , 1971 .

[8]  J. Holdren,et al.  Energy: Calculating the Risks (II). , 1979, Science.

[9]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[10]  L. Gold,et al.  Ranking possible carcinogenic hazards. , 1987, Science.

[11]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Beyond acceptable risk: On the social acceptability of technologies , 1982 .

[12]  P. D. Anderson.  Scientific Origins of Incompatibility in Risk Assessment , 1988 .

[13]  H. Inhaber,et al.  Risk with energy from conventional and nonconventional sources. , 1979, Science.

[14]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[16]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[17]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  The Risk Professionals , 1988 .

[18]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  A Simple, General Purpose Display of Magnitude of Experimental Effect , 1982 .

[19]  B. Ames,et al.  Identifying environmental chemicals causing mutations and cancer. , 1979, Science.

[20]  P Slovic,et al.  The nature of technological hazard. , 1983, Science.

[21]  N. Miller.  Learning of visceral and glandular responses. , 1969, Science.

[22]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Patterns of Conflict About Risky Technologies , 1984 .

[23]  W. Lowrance,et al.  Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety , 1976 .

[24]  Allan Schnaiberg,et al.  The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity , 1980 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[26]  William S. Cleveland.  The elements of graphing data , 1980 .

[27]  M. Sun.  Acid rain report allegedly suppressed. , 1984, Science.

[28]  Alice S. Whittemore,et al.  Facts and Values in Risk Analysis for Environmental Toxicants , 1983 .

[29]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[30]  E. Keller,et al.  A feeling for the organism : the life and work of Barbara McClintock , 1985 .

[31]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms , 1985 .

[32]  W. Freudenburg.  Perceived risk, real risk: social science and the art of probabilistic risk assessment. , 1988, Science.

[33]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[34]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psychological perspective☆ , 1978 .

[35]  Jan A. J. Stolwijk,et al.  Perceptions of Technological Risks and Benefits , 1988 .

[36]  H. Birx,et al.  The Mismeasure of Man , 1981 .

[37]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Toward A Rational Society , 1970 .