Increasing the Competitiveness of Tidal Systems by Means of the Improvement of Installation and Maintenance Maneuvers in First Generation Tidal Energy Converters—An Economic Argumentation

The most important technological advances in tidal systems are currently taking place in first generation tidal energy converters (TECs), which are installed in areas in which the depth does not exceed 40 m. Some of these devices are fixed to the seabed and it is, therefore, necessary to have special high performance ships to transport them from the base port to the tidal farm and to subsequently recover the main units of these devices. These ships are very costly, thus making the installation costs very high and, in some cases, probably unfeasible. According to what has occurred to date, the costs of the installation and maintenance procedures depend, to a great extent, on the reliability and accessibility of the devices. One of the possible solutions as regards increasing system performance and decreasing the costs of the installation and maintenance procedures is the definition of automated maneuvers, which will consequently influence: (i) an increase in the competitiveness of these technologies; (ii) a reduction in the number and duration of installation and maintenance operations; (iii) less human intervention, or (iv) the possibility of using cheaper general purpose ships rather than high cost special vessels for maintenance purposes, among others. In this research, we propose a definition of the procedures required for the manual and automated installation and maintenance maneuvers of gravity-based first generation TECs. This definition will allow us to quantify the costs of both the manual and automated operations in a more accurate manner and enable us to determine the reduction in the cost of the automated installation and maintenance procedures. It will also enable us to demonstrate that the automation of these maneuvers may be an interesting solution by which to improve the competitiveness of tidal systems in the near future.

[1]  Michael Hartnett,et al.  The Effects of Array Configuration on the Hydro-environmental Impacts of Tidal Turbines , 2017 .

[2]  J. Hardisty.  The Analysis of Tidal Stream Power , 2009 .

[3]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  Renewable energy policies and contradictions in causality: A case of Next 11 countries , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[4]  Rafael Morales,et al.  Techno-economic challenges of tidal energy conversion systems: Current status and trends , 2017 .

[5]  G. Iglesias,et al.  Dual wave farms for energy production and coastal protection under sea level rise , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Economic Feasibility of Wave Energy Farms in Portugal , 2018, Energies.

[7]  Rafael Morales Herrera,et al.  Modelado Dinámico y Control de un Dispositivo Sumergido Provisto de Actuadores Hidrostáticos , 2017 .

[8]  Ian Bryden,et al.  ME1—marine energy extraction: tidal resource analysis , 2006 .

[9]  Laura Castro-Santos,et al.  Methodology to calculate the installation costs of offshore wind farms located in deep waters , 2018 .

[10]  Tiago Neves Sequeira,et al.  Renewable energy and politics: A systematic review and new evidence , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[11]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Turkey , 2015 .

[12]  M. Winskel,et al.  Accelerating the development of marine energy: Exploring the prospects, benefits and challenges , 2013 .

[13]  J. A. Sánchez,et al.  Dispositivo para el aprovechamiento de las corrientes marinas multi-rotor con estructura poligonal , 2014 .

[14]  R. Charlier.  A “sleeper” awakes: tidal current power , 2003 .

[15]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Cost assessment methodology for combined wind and wave floating offshore renewable energy systems , 2016 .

[16]  E. Denny.  The economics of tidal energy , 2009 .

[17]  John V. Farr,et al.  Systems Life Cycle Costing: Economic Analysis, Estimation, and Management , 2011 .

[18]  Douglas D. Gransberg,et al.  Life Cycle Costing for Engineers , 2010 .

[19]  Rafael Morales,et al.  Dynamic model and experimental validation for the control of emersion manoeuvers of devices for marine currents harnessing , 2017 .

[20]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Economic comparison of technological alternatives to harness offshore wind and wave energies , 2017 .

[21]  Rafael Morales,et al.  Dynamic Model and Nonlinear Control for a Two Degrees of Freedom First Generation Tidal Energy Converter , 2016 .

[22]  W. Short,et al.  A manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies , 1995 .

[23]  Massimo Delogu,et al.  Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of a lightweight solution for an automotive component: A comparison between talc-filled and hollow glass microspheres-reinforced polymer composites , 2016 .

[24]  J. A. Somolinos,et al.  Economic-financial modeling for marine current harnessing projects , 2018, Energy.

[25]  Lorenzo Fernández,et al.  Maintenance Maneuver Automation for an Adapted Cylindrical Shape TEC , 2016 .

[26]  J. A. Somolinos,et al.  Cost Assessment Methodology and Economic Viability of Tidal Energy Projects , 2017 .

[27]  J. A. Somolinos,et al.  A strategic analysis of tidal current energy conversion systems in the European Union , 2018 .

[28]  E. García,et al.  Modelado dinámico y control de maniobras de dispositivos submarinos , 2015 .

[29]  Accounting: Tools for Business Decision Making , 2007 .

[30]  Rafael Morales,et al.  Dynamic Model and Control of a New Underwater Three-Degree-of-Freedom Tidal Energy Converter , 2015 .

[31]  C. L. Boltz.  Technology in brief , 1970 .