Interaction Between Patients With Type 2 Diabetes And Diabetes Nurse Specialists During Annual Check-Ups: A Study Using Video Recordings

Background : Patients with Type 2 diabetes are involved in lifelong treatment through annual diabetes check-up. Diabetes nurse specialists are in charge of these appointments which are meant to promote patient’s health, diabetes control as well as the recommended physical examination. Communication during the annual diabetes check-up depends on each party’s agenda or goals. The interaction structure during the annual check-ups by diabetes nurse specialists is rarely studied, though it is important for patients understanding. Objective: The aim of this study was to explain how the interaction was initiated and performed during the physical examination in annual diabetes check-ups.Methods: Applied conversation analysis was used in 20 video observations to describe verbal and nonverbal interaction between patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetes nurse specialists during the annual diabetes check-ups. Findings : Annual check-ups consisted of five phases: opening, health history, physical examination, conclusion and closing. Patients were generally the main actors. By recounting their health history they were able to set the agenda. The pattern changed to more passive participation during the physical examination which required mutual cooperation in order to create reliable outcomes. The informative value of check-ups varied depending on, the patients’ problems and the type of examination used, among other things. Practical implications: First professionals must be aware that routines of instruction to patients during physical examination procedures have an influence on patients’ understanding of measurement outcomes. Second, professionals should understand that even when there is no problems there can still be a subject for discussion about self-management. Third professionals need to be prepared to cope with embarrassing examination routines in order to enhance informative value.

[1]  Paul Drew,et al.  Analyzing talk at work: an introduction , 1992 .

[2]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Rethinking Context: An Introduction , 1992 .

[3]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[4]  The Relationship of Glycemic Exposure (HbA1c) to the Risk of Development and Progression of Retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial , 1995, Diabetes.

[5]  P. Drew,et al.  Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings , 1995 .

[6]  Philip D. Harvey,et al.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38 , 1998, BMJ.

[7]  Vesa Leppänen Structures of District Nurse - Patient Interaction , 1998 .

[8]  E. Deci,et al.  Supporting Autonomy to Motivate Patients With Diabetes for Glucose Control , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[9]  Paul ten Have,et al.  Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide , 1999 .

[10]  Maria Bergstrand Hälsorådgivande samtal : kommunikativa strategier i samspel mellan distriktssköterska och patient , 2000 .

[11]  J. Chatwin,et al.  Conversation analysis: a method for research into interactions between patients and health‐care professionals , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[12]  M. Patton Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[13]  Björn Eliasson,et al.  The National Diabetes Register in Sweden: an implementation of the St. Vincent Declaration for Quality Improvement in Diabetes Care. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[14]  Aled Jones Nurses talking to patients: exploring conversation analysis as a means of researching nurse-patient communication. , 2003, International journal of nursing studies.

[15]  T. Kettunen,et al.  Negotiation in Type 2 Diabetes Counseling: From Problem Recognition to Mutual Acceptance During Lifestyle Counseling , 2003, Qualitative health research.

[16]  N. Unwin,et al.  Knowledge and practice of foot care in people with diabetes. , 2004, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[17]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  Frequency and perceived burden of diabetes self-management activities in employees with insulin-treated diabetes: relationships with health outcomes. , 2005, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[18]  U. Rosenqvist,et al.  Misunderstandings about illness and treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  R. Rubin,et al.  Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross‐National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study , 2005, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[20]  M. Kirkevold,et al.  Life Versus Disease in Difficult Diabetes Care: Conflicting Perspectives Disempower Patients and Professionals in Problem Solving , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[21]  Berit Lundman,et al.  Patient satisfaction with diabetes care. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[22]  N. Britten,et al.  Talking an Institution into Being: the Opening Sequence in General Practice Consultations , 2005 .

[23]  Anssi Peräkylä,et al.  Communicating and responding to diagnosis , 2006 .

[24]  D. Chisholm,et al.  Diabetes guidelines : easier to preach than to practise ? , 2006 .

[25]  Danielle Pillet-Shore Weighing in primary-care nurse-patient interactions. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[26]  J. Bosch,et al.  Association of diabetes‐related emotional distress with diabetes treatment in primary care patients with Type 2 diabetes , 2007, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[27]  A. Hellström,et al.  The lived experience of the diabetes nurse specialist regular check-ups, as narrated by patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2008, Journal of clinical nursing.

[28]  Vibeke Zoffmann,et al.  A Person-Centered Communication and Reflection Model: Sharing Decision-Making in Chronic Care , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[29]  Fritjof Sahlström,et al.  In tow of the blue whale. : Learning as interactional changes in topical orientation , 2009 .

[30]  Jenny Hall Interpreting qualitative data , 2010 .