Development of a method to improve the definition and alignment of intangible project outcomes and tangible project outputs

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe a doctoral research study, including a summary of key literature review topics, the application of an action research methodology, key research findings and potential areas of future research.Design/methodology/approach – Research reported in this paper was based upon a series of five cycles of action research.Findings – An Outcome Profile™ template can be used to guide project stakeholders through the process of identifying, defining and aligning intangible project outcomes with tangible project outputs.Practical implications – The research study will advance general management and project management research and practice by providing organisations with an improved template and method for linking project stakeholders' outcomes and benefits‐based perspective of project success with the more traditional project management outputs‐based perspective of project success. The research study, in itself provides a “how‐to” guide.Originality/value – This paper ale...

[1]  C. Murray.  Make Your Case. , 2009 .

[2]  K Nogeste,et al.  Performance measures and project procurement , 2007 .

[3]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Using knowledge management to revise software‐testing processes , 2006 .

[4]  Principal Consultant,et al.  Insights from practice Project outcomes and outputs: making the intangible tangible , 2005 .

[5]  T. Phelan.  The impact of effectiveness and efficiency on project success , 2005, A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries Technology Management:.

[6]  Kersti Nogeste.  Increase the Likelihood of Project Success by Using a Proven Method to Identify and Define Intangible Project Outcomes , 2005 .

[7]  Rafi Ashrafi,et al.  Development of the SMARTTM Project Planning framework , 2004 .

[8]  Janne Malfroy,et al.  Conceptualisation of a professional doctorate program: Focusing on practice and change , 2004 .

[9]  David Baccarini,et al.  Project Benefits Management in IT Projects–an Australian Perspective , 2004 .

[10]  Philip O'Regan,et al.  Human Interaction: The Critical Source of Intangible Value , 2003 .

[11]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[12]  Timothy J. Kloppenborg,et al.  The Current State of Project Management Research: Trends, Interpretations, and Predictions , 2002 .

[13]  J. Low,et al.  Invisible advantage : how intangible are driving business performance , 2002 .

[14]  Judy McKay,et al.  The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[15]  Edith Schonberg,et al.  Measuring success , 2000, CACM.

[16]  N. Buckmaster,et al.  Associations between outcome measurement, accountability and learning for non‐profit organisations , 1999 .

[17]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[18]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .