Evaluation method for Raman depolarization measurements including geometrical effects and polarization aberrations

In this article, we address the notoriously difficult problem to quantitatively link measured Raman depolarization values to theoretical polarizability tensor quantities, since quantum calculations do not incorporate experimental parameters. For this, we introduce a numerical model to calculate, for realistic experimental configurations, effective Raman line strength functions, phi, which find their way into depolarization ratios, rho. The model is based on interlinked integrations over the angles in the light collection path and a finite Raman source volume along the excitation laser beam. The model deals also with the conditional aperture parameters, associated with more than one optical component in the light collection path. Finally, we also can take into account polarization aberrations introduced by the sample cell windows. The procedure was fully tested for Raman depolarization spectra of selected hydrogen isotopologues. Distinct aspects affecting Raman depolarization data were validated, namely: (1) excitation polarization impurities; (2) extended Raman excitation volumes; (3) Raman light collection over finite solid angles; and (4) polarization aberrations introduced by optics in the light collection path. The correction of the experimental measurement data for the aforementioned effects resulted in depolarization ratios for the Q1(J") Raman lines of H2 and T2, which mostly differed by less than 5% from those obtained by quantum-calculations.

[1]  Naonori Kita,et al.  Technique to manage polarization aberrations , 2009 .

[2]  E. Collett Field Guide to Polarization , 2005 .

[3]  Jose Carlos del Toro Iniesta,et al.  Introduction to Spectropolarimetry , 2003 .

[4]  S. Inoué,et al.  Polarization aberrations caused by differential transmission and phase shift in high- numerical-aperture lenses: theory, measurement, and rectification , 2002 .

[5]  Derek A. Long,et al.  The Raman Effect: A Unified Treatment of the Theory of Raman Scattering by Molecules , 2001 .

[6]  Fons Rademakers,et al.  ROOT — An object oriented data analysis framework , 1997 .

[7]  R. Chipman,et al.  Polarization aberrations. 1. Rotationally symmetric optical systems. , 1994, Applied optics.

[8]  N. Robertson,et al.  Measurements of birefringence in a suspended sample of fused silica , 1994 .

[9]  L. Ziegler,et al.  Polarization analysis of the 266-nm excited resonance Raman spectrum of methyl iodide , 1993 .

[10]  V. Teboul,et al.  Collection Angle Dependence of the Depolarization Ratio in Light-Scattering Experiments , 1992 .

[11]  Y. P. Zhang,et al.  Depolarization ratios of resonance Raman scattering in the gas phase , 1989 .

[12]  J. Laureyns,et al.  Polarization measurements in Raman microspectroscopy. I—Isotropic samples , 1987 .

[13]  M. L. Bansal,et al.  Calculation of Error in Depolarization Ratio Measurement Due to Finite Collection Angle in Laser Raman Spectroscopy , 1984 .

[14]  G. Turrell,et al.  Analysis of polarization measurements in Raman microspectroscopy , 1984 .

[15]  P. Dawson Polarisation measurements in Raman spectroscopy , 1972 .

[16]  Charly D. Allemand,et al.  Depolarization Ratio Measurements in Raman Spectrometry , 1970 .

[17]  Beate Bornschein,et al.  Monitoring of all hydrogen isotopologues at tritium laboratory Karlsruhe using Raman spectroscopy , 2010 .

[18]  Ronald G. Driggers,et al.  Encyclopedia of optical engineering , 2003 .

[19]  S. Porto,et al.  Depolarization ratio in Raman spectroscopy as a function of frequency , 1973 .