Design of a Neural Controller for Walking of a 5-Link Planar Biped Robot via Optimization

Underactuation, impulsive nature of the impact with the environment, the existence of feet structure and the large number of degrees of freedom are the basic problems in control of the biped robots. Underactuation is naturally associated with dexterity [1]. For example, headstands are considered dexterous. In this case, the contact point between the body and the ground is acting as a pivot without actuation. The nature of the impact between the lower limbs of the biped walker and the environment makes the dynamic of the system to be impulsive. The foot-ground impact is one of the main difficulties one has to face in design of robust control laws for biped walkers [2]. Unlike robotic manipulators, biped robots are always free to detach from the walking surface and this leads to various types of motions [2]. Finally, the existence of many degrees of freedom in the mechanism of biped robots makes the coordination of the links difficult. According to these facts, designing practical controller for biped robots remains to be a challenging problem [3]. Also, these features make applying traditional stability margins difficult. In fully actuated biped walkers where the stance foot remains flat on the ground during single support phase, well known algorithms such as the Zero Moment Point (ZMP) principle guarantees the stability of the biped robot [4]. The ZMP is defined as the point on the ground where the net moment generated from ground reaction forces has zero moment about two axes that lie in the plane of ground. Takanishi [5], Shin [6], Hirai [7] and Dasgupta [8] have proposed methods of walking patterns synthesis based on ZMP. In this kind of stability, as long as the ZMP lies strictly inside the support polygon of the foot, then the desired trajectories are dynamically feasible. If the ZMP lies on the edge of the support polygon, then the trajectories may not be dynamically feasible. The Foot Rotation Indicator (FRI) [9] is a more general form of the ZMP. FRI is the point on the ground where the net ground reaction force would have to act to keep the foot stationary. In this kind of stability, if FRI is within the convex hull of the stance foot, the robot is possible to walk and it does not roll over the toe or the heel. This kind of walking is named as fully actuated walking. If FRI is out of the foot projection on the ground, the stance foot rotates about the toe or the heel. This is also named as underactuated walking. For bipeds with point feet [10] and

[1]  J. Grizzle,et al.  A Restricted Poincaré Map for Determining Exponentially Stable Periodic Orbits in Systems with Impulse Effects: Application to Bipedal Robots , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Christine Chevallereau,et al.  Nonlinear control of mechanical systems with an unactuated cyclic variable , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Neural control of rhythmic arm movements , 1998, Neural Networks.

[4]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Hybrid zero dynamics of planar biped walkers , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Three dimensional bipedal stepping motion using neural oscillators-towards humanoid motion in the real world , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[6]  Hiroshi Shimizu,et al.  Self-organized control of bipedal locomotion by neural oscillators in unpredictable environment , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Kunikatsu Takase,et al.  Three-dimensional adaptive dynamic walking of a quadruped - rolling motion feedback to CPGs controlling pitching motion , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[8]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  REALIZATION OF DYNAMIC WALKING BY THE BIPED WALKING ROBOT WL-10RD. , 1985 .

[9]  J. Craggs Applied Mathematical Sciences , 1973 .

[10]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  Dynamics of Bipedal Gait: Part II—Stability Analysis of a Planar Five-Link Biped , 1993 .

[11]  Yildirim Hurmuzlu,et al.  Dynamics of Bipedal Gait: Part I—Objective Functions and the Contact Event of a Planar Five-Link Biped , 1993 .

[12]  Dan B. Marghitu,et al.  Rigid Body Collisions of Planar Kinematic Chains With Multiple Contact Points , 1994, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  Ambarish Goswami,et al.  Postural Stability of Biped Robots and the Foot-Rotation Indicator (FRI) Point , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  W. Haddad,et al.  A generalization of Poincare's theorem to hybrid and impulsive dynamical systems , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[15]  Jun Ho Choi,et al.  Planar bipedal robot with impulsive foot action , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[16]  Yasuhiro Fukuoka,et al.  Adaptive dynamic walking of the quadruped on irregular terrain-autonomous adaptation using neural system model , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[17]  Gentaro Taga,et al.  A model of the neuro-musculo-skeletal system for human locomotion , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Jerry Pratt,et al.  Velocity-Based Stability Margins for Fast Bipedal Walking , 2006 .

[19]  Jessy W. Grizzle,et al.  Design of asymptotically stable walking for a 5-link planar biped walker via optimization , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[20]  J. Grizzle,et al.  Feedback control of an underactuated planar bipedal robot with impulsive foot action , 2005, Robotica.

[21]  Christine Chevallereau,et al.  RABBIT: a testbed for advanced control theory , 2003 .

[22]  Alberto Isidori,et al.  Nonlinear control systems: an introduction (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[23]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[24]  Franck Plestan,et al.  Stable walking of a 7-DOF biped robot , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[25]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Changes in limb dynamics during the practice of rapid arm movements. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Kiyotoshi Matsuoka,et al.  Sustained oscillations generated by mutually inhibiting neurons with adaptation , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  Yoshihiko Nakamura,et al.  Making feasible walking motion of humanoid robots from human motion capture data , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[28]  Bernard Brogliato,et al.  Modeling, stability and control of biped robots - a general framework , 2004, Autom..

[29]  A. Michel,et al.  Stability theory for hybrid dynamical systems , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[30]  Bernard Brogliato,et al.  On tracking control of a class of complementary-slackness hybrid mechanical systems , 2000 .

[31]  H. C. Corben,et al.  Classical Mechanics (2nd ed.) , 1961 .

[32]  Ambarish Goswami,et al.  A Biomechanically Motivated Two-Phase Strategy for Biped Upright Balance Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[33]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[34]  Bernard Brogliato,et al.  Some perspectives on the analysis and control of complementarity systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[35]  Kunikatsu Takase,et al.  Towards 3D adaptive dynamic walking of a quadruped robot on irregular terrain by using neural system model , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[36]  A. Isidori Nonlinear Control Systems: An Introduction , 1986 .

[37]  M Vukobratović,et al.  Contribution to the synthesis of biped gait. , 1969, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[38]  A. Isidori,et al.  On the nonlinear equivalent of the notion of transmission zeros , 1988 .

[39]  Wisama Khalil,et al.  Modeling, Identification and Control of Robots , 2003 .

[40]  S. Grillner Control of Locomotion in Bipeds, Tetrapods, and Fish , 1981 .

[41]  Kiyotoshi Matsuoka,et al.  Mechanisms of frequency and pattern control in the neural rhythm generators , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[42]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Robot dynamics and control , 1989 .

[43]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[44]  T. Takenaka,et al.  The development of Honda humanoid robot , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[45]  Y. Z. Li,et al.  Trajectory synthesis and physical admissibility for a biped robot during the single-support phase , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[46]  G. Bingham,et al.  Hefting for a maximum distance throw: a smart perceptual mechanism. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  B. Brogliato,et al.  On the control of finite-dimensional mechanical systems with unilateral constraints , 1997, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..