Withholding effort in knowledge contribution: The role of social exchange and social cognitive on project teams

Few investigations have been made to determine what factors influence people in withholding knowledge from their colleagues. We created a construct, knowledge withholding (KW), defined as the likelihood that individuals contribute less knowledge to others in the organization than they could. We have formulated a model, based on social exchange theory and social cognition theory, to analyze the antecedents of KW from both personal and contextual perspectives. The contextual influencers were subdivided into dimensions of rational choice, normative conformity, and affective bonding to help in understanding KW. Results of a survey of 162 MIS alumni of a university, who had experienced software development, trust, distributive justice, and team-related work showed that personal outcome expectations had a substantial influence on KW.

[1]  Bill Thornton,et al.  Exploring Mental-State Reasoning as a Social—Cognitive Mechanism for Social Loafing in Children , 2007, The Journal of social psychology.

[2]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Mel Schnake,et al.  An integrative model of effort propensity , 2007 .

[4]  Chieh-Peng Lin.  To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents , 2007 .

[5]  Rajnandini Pillai,et al.  ARE THE SCALES TIPPED IN FAVOR OF PROCEDURAL OR DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE? AN INVESTIGATION OF THE U.S., INDIA, GERMANY, AND HONG KONG (CHINA) , 2001 .

[6]  Victoria L. Mitchell.  Knowledge Integration and Infromation Technology Project Performance , 2006, MIS Q..

[7]  Ragnhild Silkoset,et al.  Antecedents and effects of free riding in the franchisor-franchisee relationship , 2007 .

[8]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  R. Liden,et al.  Understanding Social Loafing: The Role of Justice Perceptions and Exchange Relationships , 2003 .

[10]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[11]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[13]  Oded Nov,et al.  Open source content contributors' response to free-riding: The effect of personality and context , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web‐based learning continuance intention , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams , 2006, MIS Q..

[16]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  R. Liden,et al.  Social Loafing: A Field Investigation , 2004 .

[18]  Y. Braunstein,et al.  Information management , 1996 .

[19]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  A. Buvik,et al.  Inter-firm cooperation and the problem of free riding behavior: an empirical study of voluntary retail chains , 2003 .

[21]  Tsai-Hsin Chu,et al.  Exploring knowledge contribution from an OCB perspective , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Tung-Ching Lin,et al.  Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Timothy A. Judge,et al.  Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects ☆ , 2006 .

[24]  Alan R. Heminger,et al.  Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting , 2003, Inf. Manag..