G Protein-coupled Receptors

Nearly 2000 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been reported since bovine opsin was cloned in 1983 (1) and the b-adrenergic receptor in 1986 (2). They are classified into over 100 subfamilies according to the sequence homology, ligand structure, and receptor function. A substantial degree of amino acid homology is found among members of a particular subfamily, but comparisons between subfamilies show significantly less or no similarity. Mutations have been observed that relate to a wide spectrum of hereditary and somatic disorders and diseases from cancer to infertility. These mutant receptors are incapable of binding ligand or generating normal signals, constitutively generate signals, or are not appropriately expressed on the cell surface. On the other hand, some mutations are beneficial. For example, a mutation in a chemokine (CCR5) receptor, which is a co-receptor for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), prevents binding of HIV to target cells and consequently prevents HIV viral infection among the majority of homozygotes with this mutation (3). Although the majority of GPCRs mediate signal transduction via G proteins, emerging evidence indicates that some of these receptors are also capable of sending signals via alternative signal molecules, e.g. Jak2 kinase, phospholipase Cg, or protein kinase C. These alternative pathways are an indication of the overall diversity occurring in the GPCR superfamily. Furthermore, there are putative seven transmembrane molecules, which do not appear to be coupled to a G protein. The most striking difference has been observed in the sites and modes of ligand binding and signal generation, which not only manifests the diversity but also indicates the availability of numerous alternative approaches to clinical and industrial applications. In this review, we describe the general structure and ligand interactions of the receptors, and in the following review, Kobilka’s group (4) focuses on the conformational changes during receptor activation.

[1]  Robert J. Lefkowitz,et al.  G Protein-coupled Receptors , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  B. Kobilka,et al.  G Protein-coupled Receptors , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  C. Hauer,et al.  Human follicle-stimulating hormone structure-activity relationships. , 1998, Biology of reproduction.

[4]  T. Ji,et al.  The Amino-terminal Region of the Luteinizing Hormone/Choriogonadotropin Receptor Contacts Both Subunits of Human Choriogonadotropin , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  Algirdas J. Jesaitis,et al.  Identification of a Ligand Binding Site in the Human Neutrophil Formyl Peptide Receptor Using a Site-specific Fluorescent Photoaffinity Label and Mass Spectrometry* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  M. Marrero,et al.  Angiotensin II-induced Association of Phospholipase Cγ1 with the G-protein-coupled AT1 Receptor* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  R. Becker,et al.  The cleaved peptide of the thrombin receptor is a strong platelet agonist. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Y. Kubo,et al.  Structural basis for a Ca2+-sensing function of the metabotropic glutamate receptors. , 1998, Science.

[9]  N. Isaacs,et al.  Modulation of High Affinity Hormone Binding , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  K. Rothschild,et al.  Hydrogen bonding changes of internal water molecules in rhodopsin during metarhodopsin I and metarhodopsin II formation. , 1998, The Biochemical journal.

[11]  S. O. Smith,et al.  The C9 methyl group of retinal interacts with glycine-121 in rhodopsin. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  H. Jüppner,et al.  Residues in the Membrane-spanning and Extracellular Loop Regions of the Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)-2 Receptor Determine Signaling Selectivity for PTH and PTH-related Peptide* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  Adam J Pawson,et al.  Irreversible activation of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor by photoaffinity cross-linking: localization of attachment site to Cys residue in N-terminal segment. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[14]  M. Marrero,et al.  Dependence on the Motif YIPP for the Physical Association of Jak2 Kinase with the Intracellular Carboxyl Tail of the Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  E. Pebay-Peyroula,et al.  X-ray structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 2.5 angstroms from microcrystals grown in lipidic cubic phases. , 1997, Science.

[16]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Arrangement of rhodopsin transmembrane α-helices , 1997, Nature.

[17]  H. Sugiyama,et al.  Phosphorylation and Calmodulin Binding of the Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 5 (mGluR5) Are Antagonistic in Vitro * , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  G. Liapakis,et al.  Constitutive Activation of the β2 Adrenergic Receptor Alters the Orientation of Its Sixth Membrane-spanning Segment* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  S. Narumiya,et al.  Identification of Domains Conferring Ligand Binding Specificity to the Prostanoid Receptor , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  M. Caterina,et al.  Random mutagenesis of the cAMP chemoattractant receptor, cAR1, of Dictyostelium. Mutant classes that cause discrete shifts in agonist affinity and lock the receptor in a novel activational intermediate. , 1997, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[21]  R. Salesse,et al.  Mapping of HCG-receptor complexes , 1996, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[22]  D. Perez,et al.  Activation of the α1b-Adrenergic Receptor Is Initiated by Disruption of an Interhelical Salt Bridge Constraint* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  Richard A Koup,et al.  Homozygous Defect in HIV-1 Coreceptor Accounts for Resistance of Some Multiply-Exposed Individuals to HIV-1 Infection , 1996, Cell.

[24]  S. Coughlin,et al.  Agonist Recognition by Proteinase-activated Receptor 2 and Thrombin Receptor , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  M. Dufau,et al.  Requirement of Cysteine Residues in Exons 16 of the Extracellular Domain of the Luteinizing Hormone Receptor for Gonadotropin Binding (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  E. Milgrom,et al.  Shedding of Human Thyrotropin Receptor Ectodomain , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  M. Maze,et al.  Arrangement of Transmembrane Domains in Adrenergic Receptors , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  T. Nanevicz,et al.  Thrombin Receptor Activating Mutations , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  R. B. Merrifield,et al.  Antibodies against specific extracellular epitopes of the glucagon receptor block glucagon binding. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  David S. Latchman,et al.  Biochemistry (4th edn) , 1995 .

[31]  S. Rivkees,et al.  Identification of Domains of the Human A1 Adenosine Receptor That Are Important for Binding Receptor Subtype-selective Ligands Using Chimeric A1/A2a Adenosine Receptors (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  J. Wess,et al.  Site-directed Mutagenesis Identifies Residues Involved in Ligand Recognition in the Human A2a Adenosine Receptor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  S. Karnik,et al.  The Docking of Arg2 of Angiotensin II with Asp281 of AT1 Receptor Is Essential for Full Agonism (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  R. Graham,et al.  Tetrazole and Carboxylate Groups of Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists Bind to the Same Subsite by Different Mechanisms (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  J. Rosenbusch,et al.  Structural basis for sugar translocation through maltoporin channels at 3.1 A resolution , 1995, Science.

[36]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Role of the second extracellular loop of adenosine receptors in agonist and antagonist binding. Analysis of chimeric A1/A3 adenosine receptors. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[37]  H. Perez,et al.  Human formyl peptide receptor ligand binding domain(s). Studies using an improved mutagenesis/expression vector reveal a novel mechanism for the regulation of receptor occupancy. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[38]  G. FitzGerald,et al.  Point mutation in the seventh hydrophobic domain of the human thromboxane A2 receptor allows discrimination between agonist and antagonist binding sites. , 1993, Molecular pharmacology.

[39]  S. Nakanishi,et al.  Role of the large extracellular domain of metabotropic glutamate receptors in agonist selectivity determination. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  L. Sklar,et al.  Evidence for protonation in the human neutrophil formyl peptide receptor binding pocket. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[41]  V. Wheaton,et al.  Molecular cloning of a functional thrombin receptor reveals a novel proteolytic mechanism of receptor activation , 1991, Cell.

[42]  Brian K. Kobilka,et al.  Cloning of the gene and cDNA for mammalian β-adrenergic receptor and homology with rhodopsin , 1986, Nature.

[43]  J. Nathans,et al.  Isolation, sequence analysis, and intron-exon arrangement of the gene encoding bovine rhodopsin , 1983, Cell.

[44]  C. Strader,et al.  Structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors. , 1994, Annual review of biochemistry.