Effects of grid alignment on modeling the spray and mixing process in direct injection diesel engines under non-reacting operating conditions

Abstract In the present study, the Lagrangian–Eulerian approach was applied in simulation of non-reacting high pressure diesel fuel injection process under different modes of engine operating conditions. Investigations were shown that if coarse commonly used polar Cartesian grids were applied in the engine calculations, highly deflected spray morphology would be resulted, leading to subsequent erroneous air–fuel mixing predictions. Interestingly, more accurate and grid independent results cannot necessarily be achieved by further grid refinement for the aforementioned polar Cartesian grid. This study focuses on the effects of the computational grid alignment and its essential role in regions near to the injector nozzle where the coupling of the Lagrangian liquid and the Eulerian gas flow approaches is critical. Enhanced and more realistic spray penetration, air–fuel mixing, equivalence ratio and scalar dissipation rate distributions were resulted by discretizing the computational grid aligned to the direction of the spray. With this regard, a novel conical grid alignment was introduced and applied in liquid fuel spray simulations of an optically accessible direct injection diesel engine under different operating conditions. Comparisons in terms of liquid and gaseous fuel distributions were made with conventional polar Cartesian grids and spray-oriented grid with the experimental data. It has been also shown that radial alignment of grids in the conical grid can effectively reduce unexpected numerical diffusions ensuring well-captured spray morphology, evolution and air–fuel mixing.

[1]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Three-Dimensional Modeling of NOx and Soot Formation in DI-Diesel Engines Using Detailed Chemistry Based on the Interactive Flamelet Approach , 1996 .

[2]  Song-Charng Kong,et al.  Parallel Computing of KIVA-4 Using Adaptive Mesh Refinement , 2009 .

[3]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Effects of Piston Bowl Geometry on Mixture Development and Late-Injection Low-Temperature Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine , 2008 .

[4]  Gianluca D'Errico,et al.  Integrated 1D-MultiD Fluid Dynamic Models for the Simulation of I.C.E. Intake and Exhaust Systems , 2007 .

[5]  Thierry Baritaud,et al.  Extension of Lagrangian-Eulerian Spray Modeling: Application to High Pressure Evaporating Diesel Sprays , 2000 .

[6]  Magdi K. Khair,et al.  Diesel Emissions and Their COntrol , 2006 .

[7]  Ming Jia,et al.  Numerical evaluation of the potential of late intake valve closing strategy for diesel PCCI (premixed charge compression ignition) engine in a wide speed and load range , 2013 .

[8]  Konstantinos Boulouchos,et al.  Predicting In-Cylinder Soot in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine for Variations in SOI and TDC Temperature Using the Conditional Moment Closure Model , 2013 .

[9]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Comparison of the Characteristic Time (CTC), Representative Interactive Flamelet (RIF), and Direct Integration with Detailed Chemistry Combustion Models against Optical Diagnostic Data for Multi-Mode Combustion in a Heavy-Duty DI Diesel Engine , 2006 .

[10]  Paul C. Miles,et al.  Corrigendum to “Conceptual models for partially premixed low-temperature diesel combustion” [Prog Energy Combust Sci 39 (2) (2013) 246–283] , 2014 .

[11]  P. Nordin Complex Chemistry Modeling of Diesel Spray Combustion , 2001 .

[12]  Kenji Hiraoka,et al.  Effect of Mesh Structure in the KIVA-4 Code with a Less Mesh Dependent Spray Model for DI Diesel Engine Simulations , 2009 .

[13]  Sebastian Mosbach,et al.  Influence of Injection Timing and Piston Bowl Geometry on PCCI Combustion and Emissions , 2009 .

[14]  Xianyin Leng,et al.  Numerical analysis on the effect of swirl ratios on swirl chamber combustion system of DI diesel engines , 2013 .

[15]  X. Qiao,et al.  Effects of highly dispersed spray nozzle on fuel injection characteristics and emissions of heavy-duty diesel engine , 2012 .

[16]  Ming Jia,et al.  The effect of injection timing and intake valve close timing on performance and emissions of diesel PCCI engine with a full engine cycle CFD simulation , 2011 .

[17]  David P. Schmidt,et al.  Mesh Independence and Adaptive Mesh Refinement For Advanced Engine Spray Simulations , 2005 .

[18]  Tommaso Lucchini,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Non-Reacting and Reacting Diesel Sprays in Constant-Volume Vessels , 2009 .

[19]  Tommaso Lucchini,et al.  Numerical investigation of the spray–mesh–turbulence interactions for high-pressure, evaporating sprays at engine conditions , 2011 .

[20]  N. Peters,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics modelling of non-premixed combustion in direct injection diesel engines , 2000 .

[21]  Song-Charng Kong,et al.  Integration of parallel computation and dynamic mesh refinement for transient spray simulation , 2009 .

[22]  Federico Brusiani,et al.  A Finite-Element Based Mesh Motion Technique for Internal Combustion Engine Simulation , 2008 .

[23]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of injection timing and rate-shape on diesel low temperature combustion using advanced CFD modeling , 2009 .

[24]  Sungwook Park,et al.  Optimization of combustion chamber geometry for stoichiometric diesel combustion using a micro genetic algorithm , 2010 .

[25]  G. Faeth Mixing, transport and combustion in sprays , 1987 .

[26]  Hiroshi Sono,et al.  PCCI Operation with Early Injection of Conventional Diesel Fuel , 2005 .

[27]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  2-Color Thermometry Experiments and High-Speed Imaging of Multi-Mode Diesel Engine Combustion , 2005 .

[28]  R. Reitz Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays , 1987 .

[29]  Song-Charng Kong,et al.  Development of adaptive mesh refinement scheme for engine spray simulations , 2009 .

[30]  Bengt Johansson,et al.  Influence of jet–jet interactions on the lift-off length in an optical heavy-duty DI diesel engine , 2013 .

[31]  A. Maghbouli,et al.  Effects of piston bowl geometry on combustion and emission characteristics of biodiesel fueled diesel engines , 2014 .

[32]  J. Monaghan Smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[33]  Yang Yu,et al.  Study of Fuel Distribution on Diesel PCCI Combustion by Development of a New Characteristic-Time Combustion Model , 2008 .

[34]  C Cemil Bekdemir,et al.  Modeling fuel spray auto-ignition using the FGM approach : effect of tabulation method , 2012 .

[35]  C. Baumgarten Mixture formation in internal combustion engines , 2006 .

[36]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Reduction of Numerical Parameter Dependencies in Diesel Spray Models , 2007 .

[37]  M. Musculus,et al.  Conceptual models for partially premixed low-temperature diesel combustion , 2013 .

[38]  R. Reitz,et al.  Validation of engine combustion models against detailed in-cylinder optical diagnostics data for a heavy-duty compression-ignition engine , 2007 .

[39]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques , 1998 .

[40]  Christopher J. Rutland,et al.  Effects of Mixing on Early Injection Diesel Combustion , 2005 .

[41]  Francesco Contino,et al.  Comparison of well-mixed and multiple representative interactive flamelet approaches for diesel spray combustion modelling , 2014 .