Development of Metrics for Evaluating Decomposed Process Models based on Wand and Weber's Good Decomposition Model

Business process modelling is an important task in business transformation initiatives. Process models visualize the working procedures of a company and pinpoint the way in which business value is created. Based on process models, functional requirements on IS are derived and decisions on IS investments are made, for instance. However, in case process models become too large, employees will hardly understand them, which restricts the potential benefits associated with business process modelling. Therefore, the decomposition of process models is a means of reducing their complexity by delineating corresponding subprocess models. However, there are few commonly accepted approaches for decomposing process models only and the properties that characterize a well-done decomposition are rather unclear. We thus revert to the good decomposition model of Wand and Weber, which was established for decomposing IS, as a means to judge the quality of decomposed process models. The present study develops metrics for evaluating decomposed process models in the eEPC notation against the good decomposition model of Wand and Weber. An application of the metrics to a process model from a cooperation project shows that the metrics provide a helpful way of objectively assessing the quality of decompositions in process modelling by using the good decomposition model.

[1]  H. D. Rombach,et al.  The Goal Question Metric Approach , 1994 .

[2]  Marlon Dumas,et al.  Criteria and Heuristics for Business Process Model Decomposition , 2016, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[3]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Do Process Modelling Techniques Get Better? A Comparative Ontological Analysis of BPMN , 2005 .

[4]  Pierre Kelsen,et al.  A generic model decomposition technique and its application to the Eclipse modeling framework , 2015, Software & Systems Modeling.

[5]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Decomposing Petri nets for process mining: A generic approach , 2013, Distributed and Parallel Databases.

[6]  Jana Koehler,et al.  The refined process structure tree , 2008, Data Knowl. Eng..

[7]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[8]  Florian Johannsen,et al.  Testing the Impact of Wand and Weber's Decomposition Model on Process Model Understandability , 2014, ICIS.

[9]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Ontological Analysis of Integrated Process Models: testing hypotheses , 2001, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  View-Based Process Visualization , 2007, BPM.

[11]  Mark Strembeck,et al.  Factors of process model comprehension - Findings from a series of experiments , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Human and automatic modularizations of process models to enhance their comprehension , 2011, Inf. Syst..

[13]  Ekkart Kindler,et al.  On the semantics of EPCs: A vicious circle , 2002, EPK.

[14]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Integrated Process Modeling: An Ontological Evaluation , 2000, Inf. Syst..

[15]  Ron Weber,et al.  Ontological foundations of information systems , 1997 .

[16]  M. Fox,et al.  Enterprise Modeling , 1998, AI Mag..

[17]  Ron Weber,et al.  A model of systems decomposition , 1989, ICIS '89.

[18]  Jan Mendling,et al.  A Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[19]  Jan Mendling,et al.  EPC markup language (EPML): an XML-based interchange format for event-driven process chains (EPC) , 2006, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[20]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Business Process Modeling- A Comparative Analysis , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  R. G. Dromey,et al.  Cornering the Chimera , 1996, IEEE Softw..

[22]  Juan de Lara,et al.  Reusable abstractions for modeling languages , 2013, Inf. Syst..

[23]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Constructing a Semantic Business Process Modelling Language for the Banking Sector - An Evolutionary Dyadic Design Science Approach , 2010, Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model..

[24]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Styles in business process modeling: an exploration and a model , 2015, Software & Systems Modeling.

[25]  Jan Recker Evaluations of Process Modeling Grammars - Ontological, Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses Using the Example of BPMN , 2011, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.

[26]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Evaluating workflow process designs using cohesion and coupling metrics , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[27]  Holger Hinrichs Datenqualitätsmanagement in Data-warehouse-Systemen , 2002 .

[28]  Daniel Alami,et al.  Process Modeling Using Event-Driven Process Chains , 2016 .

[29]  Peter Meso,et al.  The Effects of Decomposition Quality and Multiple Forms of Information on Novices' Understanding of a Domain from a Conceptual Model , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Developing a meta model for the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontological constructs , 2002, Inf. Syst..

[31]  Sven Overhage,et al.  Quality Marks, Metrics, and Measurement Procedures for Business Process Models , 2012, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[32]  Florian Johannsen,et al.  Wand and Weber’s Decomposition Model in the Context of Business Process Modeling , 2012, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[33]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Investigating expressiveness and understandability of hierarchy in declarative business process models , 2015, Software & Systems Modeling.

[34]  Jan Mendling,et al.  What Makes Process Models Understandable? , 2007, BPM.

[35]  P. Harmon The State of Business Process Management , 2013 .

[36]  Peter Meso,et al.  Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Metrics for Measuring Data Quality - Foundations for an Economic Oriented Management of Data Quality , 2007 .

[38]  Barbara Weber,et al.  Assessing Process Models with Cognitive Psychology , 2011, EMISA.

[39]  Peter Loos,et al.  Towards the Reconstruction and Evaluation of Conceptual Model Quality Discourses - Methodical Framework and Application in the Context of Model Understandability , 2012, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[40]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness , 2008, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.

[41]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG) , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[42]  Rob Davis,et al.  ARIS Design Platform: Getting Started with BPM , 2007 .

[43]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Quality metrics for business process models , 2007 .