Age-related differences in the timing of stimulus and response processes during visual selective attention: performance and psychophysiological analyses.

In this study, age-related differences in the selection of visual information were investigated. Two groups of younger and older subjects performed focused- and divided-attention (i.e., visual search) tasks. In the focused-attention task, centrally presented target letters could be flanked by compatible or incompatible noise letters. In the visual-search task, targets could be cued or uncued, and target locations could be spatially compatible or incompatible with the responding hand. P3 latency, lateralized readiness potentials, the electromyogram, and reaction times were used to detect possible age-related differences in the timing of stimulus- and response-related processes during selective processing of information. In the focused-attention task, performance of older subjects showed greater interference by incompatible flankers than did that of younger subjects because of stronger response competition caused by partial activation of the incorrect response channel by the incompatible flankers. No evidence was found of specific age-related differences in the efficiency of visual search in a divided-attention task. Furthermore, in both tasks, younger subjects showed an earlier start of response execution (in the electromyogram) relative to the onset of response preparation (lateralized readiness potential) and a higher percentage of incorrect electromyographic activity than did older subjects.

[1]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[2]  David J. Madden,et al.  Adult age differences in attentional selectivity and capacity , 1990 .

[3]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[4]  Robert Nullmeyer,et al.  Human reaction time: Toward a general theory , 1982 .

[5]  A. Welford Between bodily changes and performance: some possible reasons for slowing with age. , 1984, Experimental aging research.

[6]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  AN AGE-DECREMENT IN THE ABILITY TO IGNORE IRRELEVANT INFORMATION. , 1965, Journal of gerontology.

[7]  Raymond J. Shaw,et al.  Age-related increases in the effects of automatic semantic activation. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[8]  W. Hoyer,et al.  Age and the selectivity of visual information processing. , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[9]  M. Coles Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[10]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[11]  J. Ford,et al.  Event-related potentials recorded from young and old adults during a memory retrieval task. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  B. Butler,et al.  Identification and localization in tachistoscopic recognition: the effects of data- and resource-limitations. , 1981, Canadian journal of psychology.

[13]  H. Werner,et al.  Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. , 1962, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[14]  J. Cerella Information processing rates in the elderly. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  D. Plude,et al.  Aging, selective attention, and feature integration. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[16]  A. Kok,et al.  Early and late selection in young and old adults: an event-related potential study. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[17]  T. Salthouse Resource-reduction interpretations of cognitive aging☆ , 1988 .

[18]  John W. Rohrbaugh,et al.  13 Sensory and Motor Aspects of the Contingent Negative Variation , 1983 .

[19]  F. Craik,et al.  Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  E. Donchin,et al.  Detecting early communication: Using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[21]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  G Mulder,et al.  Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[23]  A. Sanders 20 Stage Analysis of Reaction Processes , 1980 .

[24]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Elias,et al.  Age differences in the effects of perceptual noise. , 1979, Journal of gerontology.

[26]  R. Ragot,et al.  Perceptual and motor space representation: an event-related potential study. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[27]  J Cerella,et al.  Age-related decline in extrafoveal letter perception. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[28]  A T Welford,et al.  Signal, Noise, Performance, and Age , 1981, Human factors.

[29]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Adult age and the speed-accuracy trade-off. , 1979, Ergonomics.

[30]  D. LaBerge Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  C. Brunia Movement and stimulus preceding negativity , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[32]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  M. Coles,et al.  Cognitive Psychophysiology and the Study of States and Processes , 1986 .

[34]  L. Mulder,et al.  Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  C D Wickens,et al.  Adult age differences in the speed and capacity of information processing: 2. An electrophysiological approach. , 1987, Psychology and aging.

[36]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[37]  E. Donchin Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[38]  T R Bashore,et al.  Mental slowing in elderly persons: a cognitive psychophysiological analysis. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[39]  Data-driven and memory-driven selective attention in visual search. , 1984, Journal of gerontology.

[40]  K. Brookhuis,et al.  Late positive components and stimulus evaluation time , 1981, Biological Psychology.

[41]  J. C. Woestenburg,et al.  The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain , 1983, Biological Psychology.

[42]  Hans Wallach,et al.  Adaptation in the constancy of visual direction measured by a one-trial method , 1969 .

[43]  James E. Birren,et al.  Thirteen – Aging and Attentional Processes , 1990 .