Ownership Status and Patterns of Care in Hospice: Results From the National Home and Hospice Care Survey

Background:The number of for-profit hospices increased nearly 4-fold over the past decade, more than 6 times the growth of nonprofit hospices. Despite this growth, the impact of ownership on hospice care is largely unknown. We sought to assess differences in the provision of services to patients of for-profit and nonprofit hospices. Methods:Using the 1998 National Home and Hospice Care Survey, we examined services used by patients (N = 2080) cared for by 422 hospices nationwide. We used multivariable ordered logistic and logistic regression to assess the effect of profit status on service use, adjusting for potentially confounding patient and organizational characteristics. We calculated point estimates adjusted for sampling weights and standard errors adjusted for the clustering of patients within hospices. Results:In ordered logistic models controlling for organizational and patient factors, patients of for-profit hospices received a significantly narrower range of services (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22–0.92) than patients of nonprofit hospices. This result is driven by patients of for-profit hospices receiving significantly fewer types of hospice services that federal regulations term “noncore” or more discretionary services (adjusted OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15–0.75). Conclusion:The pattern of care differs in for-profit and nonprofit hospices. As the industry develops a substantial for-profit presence, it is critical for clinicians and other healthcare professionals to be alert to the potential impact of profit status on the care their patients receive.

[1]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2002, JAMA.

[2]  G. Guyatt,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. , 2002, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[3]  J. Reschovsky,et al.  Assessments of medical care by enrollees in for-profit and nonprofit health maintenance organizations. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  D. Himmelstein,et al.  Does Investor-Ownership of Nursing Homes Compromise the Quality of Care? , 2002, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[5]  S. Chou,et al.  Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: an empirical analysis of nursing homes. , 2002, Journal of health economics.

[6]  Ana Ivelisse Avilés,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001, Technometrics.

[7]  D. Foliart,et al.  Bereavement practices among California hospices: results of a statewide survey. , 2001, Death studies.

[8]  D. Leach The ACGME competencies: substance or form? , 2001 .

[9]  C. J. Simon,et al.  Patients and profits: the relationship between HMO financial performance and quality of care. , 2001, Health affairs.

[10]  A. Zaslavsky,et al.  Health plan characteristics and consumers' assessments of quality. , 2001, Health Affairs.

[11]  Tx Station Stata Statistical Software: Release 7. , 2001 .

[12]  C. M. Baker,et al.  Hospital ownership, performance, and outcomes: assessing the state-of-the-science. , 2000, The Journal of nursing administration.

[13]  N. Christakis,et al.  Impact of individual and market factors on the timing of initiation of hospice terminal care. , 2000, Medical care.

[14]  S. Wolfe,et al.  Quality of care in investor-owned vs not-for-profit HMOs. , 1999, JAMA.

[15]  E. Bradley,et al.  Education and Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes: The Impact of Ownership Type , 1998 .

[16]  R M Elashoff,et al.  Hospital- and patient-related characteristics determining maternity length of stay: a hierarchical linear model approach. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[17]  C. Geckler,et al.  HMO quality and financial performance: is there a connection? , 1998, Journal of health care finance.

[18]  M. Schlesinger,et al.  Competition, ownership, and access to hospital services. Evidence from psychiatric hospitals. , 1997, Medical care.

[19]  B. Gray,et al.  Charity and community: the role of nonprofit ownership in a managed health care system. , 1996, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law.

[20]  C A Gatsonis,et al.  Variations in the Utilization of Coronary Angiography for Elderly Patients with an Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Analysis Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression , 1995, Medical care.

[21]  M. Rosko,et al.  Do for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes behave differently? , 1994, The Gerontologist.

[22]  The impact of ownership form and regulatory measures on firm behavior: a study of hospices. , 1994, Nonprofit management & leadership.

[23]  Efficient evaluation of treatment effects in the presence of missing covariate values. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[25]  S. Rose-Ackerman,et al.  The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions. , 1987 .

[26]  Burrell Ce Not-for-profit HMOs. , 1987 .

[27]  B. Gray,et al.  For-profit enterprise in health care. The Institute of Medicine Study. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  B. Weisbrod,et al.  Public, Private, Nonprofit Ownership and the Response to Asymmetric Information: The Case of Nursing Homes , 1986 .

[29]  C. Holden The Hospice Movement and Its Implications , 1980, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

[30]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .