Blocking mitophagy does not improve fuel ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Ethanol fermentation is frequently performed under conditions of low nitrogen. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, nitrogen limitation induces macroautophagy, including the selective removal of mitochondria, also called mitophagy. Shiroma and co-workers (2014) showed that blocking mitophagy by deletion of the mitophagy specific gene ATG32 increased the fermentation performance during the brewing of Ginjo sake. In this study, we tested if a similar strategy could enhance alcoholic fermentation in the context of fuel ethanol production from sugarcane in Brazilian biorefineries. Conditions that mimic the industrial fermentation process indeed induce Atg32-dependent mitophagy in cells of S. cerevisiae PE-2, a strain frequently used in the industry. However, after blocking mitophagy, no differences in CO2 production, final ethanol titres or cell viability were observed after five rounds of ethanol fermentation, cell recycling and acid treatment, as commonly performed in sugarcane biorefineries. To test if S. cerevisiae’s strain background influences this outcome, cultivations were carried out in a synthetic medium with strains PE-2, Ethanol Red (industrial) and BY (laboratory), with and without a functional ATG32 gene, under oxic and oxygen restricted conditions. Despite the clear differences in sugar consumption, cell viability and ethanol titres, among the three strains, we could not observe any improvement in fermentation performance related to the blocking of mitophagy. We conclude with caution that results obtained with Ginjo sake yeast is an exception and cannot be extrapolated to other yeast strains and that more research is needed to ascertain the role of autophagic processes during fermentation. Importance Bioethanol is the largest (per volume) ever biobased bulk chemical produced globally. The fermentation process is very well established, and industries regularly attain nearly 85% of maximum theoretical yields. However, because of the volume of fuel produced, even a small improvement will have huge economic benefits. To this end, besides already implemented process improvements, various free energy conservation strategies have been successfully exploited at least in laboratory strains to increase ethanol yields and decrease by-product formation. Cellular housekeeping processes have been an almost unexplored territory in strain improvement. Shiroma and co-workers previously reported that blocking mitophagy by deletion of the mitophagy receptor gene ATG32 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae led to a 2.12% increase in final ethanol titres during Japanese sake fermentation. We found in two commercially used bioethanol strains (PE-2 and Ethanol Red) that ATG32 deficiency does not lead to an improvement in cell viability or ethanol levels during fermentation with molasses or in a synthetic complete medium. More research is required to ascertain the role of autophagic processes during fermentation conditions.

[1]  A. K. Gombert,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used industrially for bioethanol production. , 2021, Essays in biochemistry.

[2]  A. K. Gombert,et al.  Aerobic growth physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on sucrose is strain-dependent. , 2021, FEMS yeast research.

[3]  A. K. Gombert,et al.  Aerobic growth physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on sucrose is strain-dependent , 2021, bioRxiv.

[4]  Timothy G. Stephens,et al.  Comparative Genomics Supports That Brazilian Bioethanol Saccharomyces cerevisiae Comprise a Unified Group of Domesticated Strains Related to Cachaça Spirit Yeasts , 2020, bioRxiv.

[5]  H. Hoshida,et al.  Anoxia-induced mitophagy in the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. , 2020, FEMS yeast research.

[6]  Xiaorong Tan,et al.  Mitophagy Improves Ethanol Tolerance in Yeast: Regulation by Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2020, Journal of microbiology and biotechnology.

[7]  Qihe Chen,et al.  Deletion of Atg22 gene contributes to reduce programmed cell death induced by acetic acid stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2019, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[8]  H. Shimizu,et al.  Repression of mitochondrial metabolism for cytosolic pyruvate-derived chemical production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2019, Microbial Cell Factories.

[9]  A. J. Cruz,et al.  A New Methodology to Calculate the Ethanol Fermentation Efficiency at Bench and Industrial Scales , 2018, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

[10]  M. Sommer,et al.  A synthetic medium to simulate sugarcane molasses , 2018, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[11]  J. Tyler,et al.  The role of autophagy in the regulation of yeast life span , 2018, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Vladimir Jiranek,et al.  Disruption of the cell wall integrity gene ECM33 results in improved fermentation by wine yeast. , 2017, Metabolic engineering.

[13]  A. K. Gombert,et al.  Improving conversion yield of fermentable sugars into fuel ethanol in 1st generation yeast-based production processes. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[14]  J. Pronk,et al.  Physiology of the fuel ethanol strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE-2 at low pH indicates a context-dependent performance relevant for industrial applications. , 2014, FEMS yeast research.

[15]  Magdalena Kwolek-Mirek,et al.  Comparison of methods used for assessing the viability and vitality of yeast cells. , 2014, FEMS yeast research.

[16]  E. Nevoigt,et al.  The fraction of cells that resume growth after acetic acid addition is a strain-dependent parameter of acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2014, FEMS yeast research.

[17]  J. Thevelein,et al.  Combining inhibitor tolerance and D-xylose fermentation in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulose-based bioethanol production , 2013, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[18]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Genome-wide Fitness Profiles Reveal a Requirement for Autophagy During Yeast Fermentation , 2011, G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics.

[19]  Anders Blomberg,et al.  Trait Variation in Yeast Is Defined by Population History , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[20]  Fabiana M. Duarte,et al.  Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. , 2009, Genome research.

[21]  D. Klionsky,et al.  Monitoring mitophagy in yeast: The Om45-GFP processing assay , 2009, Autophagy.

[22]  Y. Ohsumi,et al.  A landmark protein essential for mitophagy , 2009 .

[23]  D. Klionsky,et al.  Atg32 is a mitochondrial protein that confers selectivity during mitophagy. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[24]  D. Klionsky,et al.  Mitophagy in Yeast Occurs through a Selective Mechanism* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  M. L. Lopes,et al.  Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. , 2008, FEMS yeast research.

[26]  Fred Winston,et al.  Heme Levels Switch the Function of Hap1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae between Transcriptional Activator and Transcriptional Repressor , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[27]  E. Cebollero,et al.  Autophagy: from basic research to its application in food biotechnology. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[28]  Daniel J. Klionsky,et al.  Autophagy in Health and Disease: A Double-Edged Sword , 2004, Science.

[29]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants , 2001, Science.

[30]  J. Mccusker,et al.  Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Yeast.

[31]  C. Herbert,et al.  A ‘natural’ mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains derived from S288c affects the complex regulatory gene HAP1 (CYP1) , 1999, Current Genetics.

[32]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[33]  S. Walford Composition of cane juice , 1996 .

[34]  E. J. Lodolo,et al.  MITOCHONDRIAL RELEVANCE TO YEAST FERMENTATIVE PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW , 1996 .

[35]  J R Johnston,et al.  Genealogy of principal strains of the yeast genetic stock center. , 1986, Genetics.

[36]  J. Šubík,et al.  Obligatory requirement of intramitochondrial ATP for normal functioning of the eucaryotic cell. , 1972, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[37]  A. Panek Function of trehalose in Baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) , 1963 .

[38]  S. Alves,et al.  Advances in yeast alcoholic fermentations for the production of bioethanol, beer and wine. , 2019, Advances in applied microbiology.

[39]  Sang-Seob Lee,et al.  Tessaracoccus defluvii sp. nov., isolated from an aeration tank of a sewage treatment plant , 2016, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[40]  Y. Ohsumi,et al.  A landmark protein essential for mitophagy: Atg32 recruits the autophagic machinery to mitochondria. , 2009, Autophagy.

[41]  H. Shimoi,et al.  A hap1 mutation in a laboratory strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in decreased expression of ergosterol-related genes and cellular ergosterol content compared to sake yeast. , 2004, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[42]  R. D. Gietz,et al.  Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[43]  K. Smart,et al.  Use of methylene violet staining procedures to determine yeast viability and vitality , 1999 .

[44]  F. Winston,et al.  A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. , 1987, Gene.