Individuals have unique muscle activation signatures as revealed during gait and pedaling.

Although it is known that the muscle activation patterns used to produce even simple movements can vary between individuals, these differences have not been considered to prove the existence of individual muscle activation strategies (signatures). We used a machine learning approach (support vector machine) to test the hypothesis that each individual has unique muscle activation signatures. Eighty participants performed a series of pedaling and gait tasks. 53 of these participants performed a second experimental session on a subsequent day. Myoelectrical activity was measured from 8 muscles: vastus lateralis and medialis, rectus femoris, gastrocnemius lateralis and medialis, soleus, tibialis anterior, biceps femoris-long head. The classification task involved separating data into training and testing sets. For the within-day classification, each pedaling/gait cycle was tested using the classifier, which had been trained on the remaining cycles. For the between-day classification, each cycle from day 2 was tested using the classifier, which had been trained on the cycles from day 1.When considering all 8 muscles, the activation profiles were assigned to the corresponding individuals with a classification rate of up to 99.28% (2353/2370 cycles) and 91.22%(2343/2370 cycles) for the within-day and between-day classification, respectively. When considering the within-day classification, a combination of 2 muscles was sufficient to obtain a classification rate >80% for both pedaling and gait. When considering between-day classification, a combination of 4-5 muscles was sufficient to obtain a classification rate >80% for pedaling and gait. These results demonstrate that strategies not only vary between individuals, but are unique to each individual.

[1]  Julien Frère,et al.  Between-subject variability of muscle synergies during a complex motor skill , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[2]  Jeffrey M. McManus,et al.  Sensory Feedback Reduces Individuality by Increasing Variability within Subjects , 2015, Current Biology.

[3]  Daniel Baum,et al.  Nature of the coupling between neural drive and force-generating capacity in the human quadriceps muscle , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Yasuharu Koike,et al.  When 90% of the variance is not enough: residual EMG from muscle synergy extraction influences task performance , 2019, bioRxiv.

[5]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  C. T. Nguyen,et al.  Variability of neural activation during walking in humans: short heels and big calves , 2011, Biology Letters.

[7]  Jens Bojsen-Møller,et al.  Heterogeneous Loading of the Human Achilles Tendon In Vivo , 2015, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[8]  Jessica L. Allen,et al.  Neuromechanical Principles Underlying Movement Modularity and Their Implications for Rehabilitation , 2015, Neuron.

[9]  D. Winter,et al.  Is there a ‘normal’ profile of EMG activity in gait? , 1986, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  Sylvain Dorel,et al.  Smoothing of electromyographic signals can influence the number of extracted muscle synergies , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Vladimir M Zatsiorsky,et al.  Optimization-Based Models of Muscle Coordination , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[12]  Benno M. Nigg,et al.  Daily changes of individual gait patterns identified by means of support vector machines. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[13]  Chao Zhai,et al.  Dynamic similarity promotes interpersonal coordination in joint action , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  Wolfgang I. Schöllhorn,et al.  One-year persistence of individual gait patterns identified in a follow-up study - A call for individualised diagnose and therapy. , 2017, Gait & posture.

[15]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  Simon C. Gandevia,et al.  Small amounts of involuntary muscle activity reduce passive joint range of motion. , 2019, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  F. Hug,et al.  Muscle Coordination and the Development of Musculoskeletal Disorders , 2017, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[18]  A. Guével,et al.  Is interindividual variability of EMG patterns in trained cyclists related to different muscle synergies? , 2010, Journal of applied physiology.

[19]  Angkoon Phinyomark,et al.  Gender differences in gait kinematics for patients with knee osteoarthritis , 2016, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[20]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[21]  Gerald E. Loeb,et al.  Optimal isn’t good enough , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  G. E. Loeb,et al.  The distal hindlimb musculature of the cat: interanimal variability of locomotor activity and cutaneous reflexes , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  A. Pedotti,et al.  A study of motor coordination and neuromuscular activities in human locomotion , 1977, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  Lowell M Smoger,et al.  Statistical modeling to characterize relationships between knee anatomy and kinematics , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  Marion Crouzier,et al.  Neuromechanical coupling within the human triceps surae and its consequence on individual force-sharing strategies , 2018, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  Aymar de Rugy,et al.  Muscle Coordination Is Habitual Rather than Optimal , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Yvan Champoux,et al.  Interindividual variability of electromyographic patterns and pedal force profiles in trained cyclists , 2008, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[28]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[29]  Jeffrey P. Gill,et al.  Motor neuronal activity varies least among individuals when it matters most for behavior. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Taija Finni,et al.  Differential contributions of ankle plantarflexors during submaximal isometric muscle action: a PET and EMG study. , 2014, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[31]  A. d’Avella,et al.  Locomotor Primitives in Newborn Babies and Their Development , 2011, Science.

[32]  Tingting Mu,et al.  Gait recognition: highly unique dynamic plantar pressure patterns among 104 individuals , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[33]  G E Loeb,et al.  Asymmetry of hindlimb muscle activity and cutaneous reflexes after tendon transfers in kittens. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.