Silent echo-planar imaging for auditory FMRI

IntroductionThe effect of the acoustic scanner noise produced by gradient coil switching on the auditory evoked BOLD signal represents a well-known problem in auditory functional MRI (FMRI). In this paper, a new low-noise echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence is presented that is optimized for auditory FMRI measurements.MethodsThe sequence produces a narrow-band acoustic frequency spectrum by using a sinusoidal readout echo train and a constant phase encoding gradient. This narrow band is adapted to the frequency response function of the MR scanner by varying the switching frequency of the sinusoidal readout gradient.ResultsCompared to a manufacturer-provided standard EPI sequence, the acoustic noise reduction amounts to up to 20 dBA. Using a simple block design paradigm contrasting presentation of a pure tone during ON blocks and “silence” (absence of the tone) during OFF blocks, the new low-noise sequence was evaluated and compared to the standard EPI sequence. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) resulted in higher levels of significance of auditory activation for the low-noise sequence.DiscussionThese findings strongly suggest that the low-noise sequence may generate enhanced BOLD contrasts compared to the standard EPI sequences commonly used in FMRI.

[1]  W A Edelstein,et al.  Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  J. S. Kim,et al.  A new silent magnetic resonance imaging using a rotating DC gradient , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  J. Melcher,et al.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  A. Katsunuma,et al.  Quiet MRI with novel acoustic noise reduction , 2001, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[5]  T. Loenneker,et al.  “Silent” MRI with soft gradient pulses , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  A R Palmer,et al.  Sound‐Level Measurements and Calculations of Safe Noise Dosage During EPI at 3 T , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al.  Interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) imaging: A new sparse imaging method applied to auditory fMRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  J. D. O'Sullivan,et al.  A Fast Sinc Function Gridding Algorithm for Fourier Inversion in Computer Tomography , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Enhancing BOLD response in the auditory system by neurophysiologically tuned fMRI sequence , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  H. Hake,et al.  On the Masking Pattern of a Simple Auditory Stimulus , 1950 .

[11]  A R Palmer,et al.  Active control of the volume acquisition noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging: method and psychoacoustical evaluation. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J Hennig,et al.  Quiet imaging with interleaved spiral read-out. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  J R Ives,et al.  Functional burst imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  R. Bowtell,et al.  The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Peter Mansfield,et al.  Principles of active acoustic control in gradient coil design , 2007, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[16]  Robert Turner,et al.  Echo-Planar Imaging , 1998 .

[17]  P Mansfield,et al.  Sound generation in gradient coil structures for MRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  E Borg,et al.  MRI acoustic noise: Sound pressure and frequency analysis , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .

[20]  M. Quirk,et al.  Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[21]  R E Brummett,et al.  Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[22]  R. L. Wegel,et al.  The Auditory Masking of One Pure Tone by Another and its Probable Relation to the Dynamics of the Inner Ear , 1924 .

[23]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  D Atkinson,et al.  Determination of gradient magnetic field‐induced acoustic noise associated with the use of echo planar and three‐dimensional, fast spin echo techniques , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  R I Kitney,et al.  Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  Jan Timmer,et al.  The gridding method for image reconstruction by Fourier transformation , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[27]  K Tschopp,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is a Non-invasive Method for the Detection of Focal Brain Activity at High Spatial Resolution. Acoustic Stimulation Leads to a Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent , 2022 .

[28]  Eugen Diesch,et al.  Enhancement of steady‐state auditory evoked magnetic fields in tinnitus , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  F Hennel,et al.  Fast spin echo and fast gradient echo MRI with low acoustic noise , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  P Börnert,et al.  Reversed spiral MR imaging , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  K Sekihara,et al.  New reconstruction technique for echo‐planar imaging to allow combined use of odd and even numbered echoes , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  R. Mallozzi,et al.  Making MRI quieter. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[33]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[34]  M. Bock,et al.  Echo Planar Imaging on a Standard 1.5 Tesla Imager , 1995 .