Fostering trust in virtual project teams: Towards a design framework grounded in a TrustWorthiness ANtecedents (TWAN) schema

Several collaboration problems in virtual project teams that work in knowledge-intensive contexts can be attributed to a hampered process of interpersonal trust formation. Solutions to trust formation problems need to be based on an understanding of how interpersonal trust forms in face-to-face project teams as well as on insight into how this process differs in virtual teams. Synthesizing literature from various disciplines, we propose a model for the formation of interpersonal trust between project team members. Taking this model as a starting point, we analyse how virtual settings may alter or even obstruct the process of trust formation. One method to improve the formation of interpersonal trust in virtual settings is to facilitate the assessment of trustworthiness. This can be done by making information available about individual virtual project team members. Previous research in virtual project teams focussed principally on the medium by which information is spread, for example, by phone, mail, or videoconferencing. Most researchers failed to take the specific content of the information into account, although there is general agreement that personal, non-task-related information is important to foster trust. For this, we propose to use the antecedents of trustworthiness, which until now have mainly been used as a framework to measure trust, as a design framework instead. This framework of antecedents can also be used to determine which type of information is relevant to assess each other's trustworthiness. We review existing literature on the antecedents of trustworthiness and extend the well-accepted antecedents of 'ability', 'benevolence' and 'integrity' with several other antecedents, such as 'communality' and 'accountability'. Together, these form the TrustWorthiness ANtecedents (TWAN) schema. We describe how these antecedents can be used to determine which information is relevant for team members assessing others' trustworthiness. In future research we will first verify this extended cognitive schema of trustworthiness (TWAN) empirically and then apply it to the design of artefacts or guidelines, such as a personal identity profile to support the assessment of trustworthiness in virtual project teams.

[1]  Lik Mui,et al.  Notions of reputation in multi-agents systems: a review , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[2]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Psychologie, een inleiding: Oefenboek , 1999 .

[3]  S. Shapiro The Social Control of Impersonal Trust , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[5]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Frances Slack,et al.  Community building and virtual teamwork in an online learning environment , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[7]  K. Cook Trust in Society , 2001 .

[8]  Morton Deutschi The Effect of Motivational Orientation upon Trust and Suspicion , 1960 .

[9]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Trust in electronic environments , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[10]  Rietje van Dam-Mieras,et al.  Virtual seminars – or how to foster an international, multidisciplinary dialogue on sustainable development , 2007 .

[11]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[12]  Aneil Mishra ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO CRISIS: THE CENTRALITY OF TRUST , 1996 .

[13]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. , 1996 .

[14]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Work Psychology: Understanding Human Behaviour in the Workplace , 1991 .

[15]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams , 2006 .

[16]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[17]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[18]  Mara Olekalns,et al.  Preventing Betrayal and Promoting Trust: A Social Exchange Analysis of Strategic Focus in Negotiation , 2007 .

[19]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[20]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  Trust in mediated interactions , 2005 .

[21]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  E. McDonough,et al.  An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams , 2001 .

[23]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[24]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future , 2007 .

[25]  T. Postmes,et al.  Short Communication A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour , 2005 .

[26]  D. Collard,et al.  Trust : making and breaking cooperative relations , 1989 .

[27]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[28]  P. Kollock SOCIAL DILEMMAS: The Anatomy of Cooperation , 1998 .

[29]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[30]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[31]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Empathy and online interpersonal trust: A fragile relationship , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  The Rules of Virtual Groups , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  What Makes Learning and Understanding in Virtual Teams So Difficult? , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[35]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[36]  J. Rotter A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[37]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks , 2003 .

[38]  Pearn Kandola,et al.  The Psychology of Effective Business Communications in Geographically Dispersed Teams , 2006 .

[39]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications , 1998 .

[40]  富岡 美知子 How Japanese and Americans present themselves in their initial encounters : a thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree [,] Master of Arts in Speech Communication , 1994 .

[41]  Robert A. Roe,et al.  Conflict, Trust, and Effectiveness in Teams Performing Complex Tasks: A Study of Temporal Patterns , 2006 .

[42]  A. Ortony,et al.  What's basic about basic emotions? , 1990, Psychological review.

[43]  Catalina M. Danis Extending the concept of awareness to include static and dynamic person information , 2000, SIGG.

[44]  John K. Butler,et al.  A Behavioral Decision Theory Approach to Modeling Dyadic Trust in Superiors and Subordinates , 1984 .

[45]  M. Dignum,et al.  Towards a Model to Understand the Influence of Trust in Knowledge Sharing Decisions , 2005 .

[46]  Catherine Durnell Cramton,et al.  INFORMATION PROBLEMS IN DISPERSED TEAMS. , 1997 .

[47]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[48]  A. Athos,et al.  Interpersonal Behavior: Communication and Understanding in Relationships , 1978 .

[49]  Stephen Marsh,et al.  Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept , 1994 .

[50]  N. Luhmann,et al.  Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations , 1990 .

[51]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[52]  M. Bacharach,et al.  Trust in signs. , 2001 .

[53]  Catherine Durnell Cramton,et al.  Relationships among geographic dispersion, team processes, and effectiveness in software development work teams , 2005 .

[54]  John K. Butler Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory , 1991 .

[55]  David J. Pauleen Virtual Teams: Projects, Protocols and Processes , 2003 .

[56]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[57]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[58]  R. Hardin Trust and Trustworthiness , 2002 .

[59]  Kirsimarja Blomqvist,et al.  Managing distance in a global virtual team: the evolution of trust through technology‐mediated relational communication , 2005 .

[60]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  Line Dubé,et al.  The Multi-Faceted Nature of Virtual Teams , 2004 .

[62]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[63]  N. Luhmann Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives , 2000 .

[64]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. , 1995 .

[65]  S. Jeanquart-Barone,et al.  Trust differences between supervisors and subordinates: Examining the role of race and gender , 1993 .

[66]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[67]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Trust in virtual teams: towards an integrative model of trust formation , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[68]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Nature, Meaning, and Measurement of Trust , 2000 .

[69]  Steffen Staab,et al.  The Pudding of Trust , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[70]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[71]  Russell Haines,et al.  The Development of Trust in Virtual Teams , 2003, AMCIS.

[72]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[73]  John Michael Pearson,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of How Trust, Cohesion, and Performance Vary in Virtual and Face-to-Face Teams , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[74]  J. Donath Signals, cues and meaning , 2007 .

[75]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[76]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[77]  C. Johnson-George,et al.  Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. , 1982 .

[78]  Darren Gergle,et al.  Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development , 2002, CHI.

[79]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  i2i trust in e-commerce , 2000, CACM.

[80]  Gail Corbitt,et al.  A comparison of team developmental stages, trust and performance for virtual versus face-to-face teams , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[81]  Cristiano Castelfranchi Why We Need a Non-reductionist Approach to Trust , 2006, iTrust.

[82]  Penelope Brown Technology and trust in teams , 2000, Proceedings Academia/Industry Working Conference on Research Challenges '00. Next Generation Enterprises: Virtual Organizations and Mobile/Pervasive Technologies. AIWORC'00. (Cat. No.PR00628).

[83]  Suzanne P. Weisband,et al.  Developing trust in virtual teams , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[84]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[85]  N. L. Chervany,et al.  What is Trust? A Conceptual Analysis and an Interdisciplinary Model , 2000 .

[86]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Trust is much more than subjective probability: mental components and sources of trust , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[87]  Penelope Sue Greenberg,et al.  Creating and Sustaining Trust in Virtual Teams , 2007 .

[88]  L. Pessoa On the relationship between emotion and cognition , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[89]  Rob Koper,et al.  From pattern to practice: Evaluation of a design pattern fostering trust in virtual teams , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[90]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Towards an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Computerized Systems: Distinguishing Concepts and Types of Trust , 1998 .

[91]  J. Walther Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[92]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation , 2005 .

[93]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  Social cognition: Categorical person perception. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[94]  P. Kollock The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment, and Trust , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[95]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[96]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  Trust and knowledge sharing: A critical combination , 2002 .

[97]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .