Predicting Internet End-to-End Delay: A Multiple-Model Approach

This paper presents a novel approach to predict the Internet end-to-end delay using multiple-model (MM) methods. The basic idea of the MM method is to assume the system dynamics can be described by a set of models rather than a single one; by running a bank of filters (each corresponds to a certain model in the set) in parallel at the same time, the MM output is given by a combination of the estimates from these filters. Based on collected end-to-end delay data and preliminary data analysis, we propose an off-line model set design procedure using vector quantization (VQ) and short-term time series analysis so that MM methods can be applied to predict on-line measurement data. Numerical results show that the proposed MM predictor outperforms two widely used adaptive filters in terms of prediction accuracy and robustness.

[1]  Vern Paxson,et al.  On estimating end-to-end network path properties , 2001, SIGCOMM LA '01.

[2]  Alexander G. Parlos,et al.  Identification of the Internet end-to-end delay dynamics using multi-step neuro-predictors , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN'02 (Cat. No.02CH37290).

[3]  Jean-Chrysostome Bolot,et al.  Characterizing End-to-End Packet Delay and Loss in the Internet , 1993, J. High Speed Networks.

[4]  Nageswara S. V. Rao Overlay networks of in situ instruments for probabilistic guarantees on message delays in wide-area networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  D. Lainiotis,et al.  Partitioning: A unifying framework for adaptive systems, I: Estimation , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Predicting Internet End-to-End Delay : A Statistical Study † , 2005 .

[7]  G. Beligiannis,et al.  A generic applied evolutionary hybrid technique , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[8]  David Clark,et al.  Supporting Real-Time Applications in an Integrated Services Packet Network: Architecture and Mechanism , 1992, SIGCOMM.

[9]  V. Jilkov,et al.  Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part V. Multiple-model methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  Fernando Paganini,et al.  Internet congestion control , 2002 .

[11]  X. R. Li,et al.  Predicting End-to-End Delay of the Internet Using Time Series Analysis ∗ , 2003 .

[12]  X. Rong Li,et al.  Model-set design for multiple-model method. Part I , 2002 .

[13]  Xiaojiang Du,et al.  QoS routing based on multi-class nodes for mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, Ad Hoc Networks.

[14]  Ming Yang,et al.  Predicting Internet end-to-end delay: an overview , 2004, Thirty-Sixth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[15]  Darryl Veitch,et al.  Understanding end-to-end Internet traffic dynamics , 1998, IEEE GLOBECOM 1998 (Cat. NO. 98CH36250).

[16]  Prathima Agrawal,et al.  Delay Reduction Techniques for Playout Buffering , 2000, IEEE Trans. Multim..

[17]  V. Jacobson,et al.  Congestion avoidance and control , 1988, CCRV.

[18]  Andrej Kos,et al.  Techniques for performance improvement of VoIP applications , 2002, 11th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (IEEE Cat. No.02CH37379).

[19]  Hiroyuki Ohsaki,et al.  Modeling end-to-end packet delay dynamics of the internet using system identification , 2001 .

[20]  X. R. Li,et al.  Chapter 10 Engineer ’ s Guide to Variable-Structure Multiple-Model Estimation for Tracking , 2022 .

[21]  Robert M. Gray,et al.  An Algorithm for Vector Quantizer Design , 1980, IEEE Trans. Commun..