Accuracy of the ICD-10 discharge diagnosis for syncope.

AIMS Administrative discharge codes are widely used in epidemiology, but the specificity and sensitivity of this coding is unknown and must be validated. We assessed the validity of the discharge diagnosis of syncope in administrative registers and reviewed the etiology of syncope after workup. METHODS AND RESULTS Two samples were investigated. One sample consisted of 5262 randomly selected medical patients. The other sample consisted of 750 patients admitted or seen in the emergency department (ED) for syncope (ICD-10: R55.9) in three hospitals in Denmark. All charts were reviewed for baseline characteristics and to confirm the presence/absence of syncope and to compare with the administrative coding. In a sample of 600 admitted patients 570 (95%) and of 150 patients from ED 140 (93%) had syncope representing the positive predictive values. Median age of the population was 69 years (IQR: ± 14). In the second sample of 5262 randomly selected medical patients, 75 (1.4%) had syncope, of which 47 were coded as R55.9 yielding a sensitivity of 62.7%, a negative predictive value of 99.5%, and a specificity of 99.9%. CONCLUSION ED and hospital discharge diagnostic coding for syncope has a positive predictive value of 95% and a sensitivity of 63%.

[1]  L. Køber,et al.  The relation between age, sex, comorbidity, and pharmacotherapy and the risk of syncope: a Danish nationwide study. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  J. Hardin,et al.  Four novel point mutations in the PMP22 gene with phenotypes of HNPP and Dejerine–Sottas neuropathy , 2011, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  P. Laurberg,et al.  Use of combined search criteria improved validity of rare disease (craniopharyngioma) diagnosis in a national registry. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  G. Rouleau,et al.  Mutated GABAA receptor subunits in idiopathic generalized epilepsy , 2010 .

[5]  Hude Quan,et al.  How accurate is ICD coding for epilepsy? , 2010, Epilepsia.

[6]  C. Mangione,et al.  Predictors of 30-day serious events in older patients with syncope. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[7]  J. Blanc,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009) The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) , 2009 .

[8]  W. Shen,et al.  Incidence and mortality rates of syncope in the United States. , 2009, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  I. Stiell,et al.  Death after emergency department visits for syncope: how common and can it be predicted? , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  G. Larsen,et al.  Epidemiology of syncope in hospitalized patients , 1999, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[11]  Michael D. Hill,et al.  Coding of Stroke and Stroke Risk Factors Using International Classification of Diseases, Revisions 9 and 10 , 2005, Stroke.

[12]  C. Camargo,et al.  Direct medical costs of syncope-related hospitalizations in the United States. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  C. Camargo,et al.  Characteristics and admission patterns of patients presenting with syncope to U.S. emergency departments, 1992-2000. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[14]  M. Frisch,et al.  Validity of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[15]  J. Wöhrle,et al.  Syncope in the elderly , 2003, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie.

[16]  D. Levy,et al.  Incidence and prognosis of syncope. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  C. Lovis,et al.  Prospective evaluation of patients with syncope: a population-based study☆ , 2002 .

[18]  T. F. Andersen,et al.  The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. , 1999, Danish medical bulletin.

[19]  B. Hanusa,et al.  Is syncope a risk factor for poor outcomes? Comparison of patients with and without syncope. , 1996, The American journal of medicine.

[20]  W. Kapoor,et al.  Evaluation and Outcome of Patients with Syncope , 1990, Medicine.

[21]  L. Lipsitz,et al.  Syncope in an elderly, institutionalised population: prevalence, incidence, and associated risk. , 1985, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[22]  E F Cook,et al.  Evaluation and outcome of emergency room patients with transient loss of consciousness. , 1982, The American journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Knight,et al.  coding in , 2022 .