Use of a local cone model to predict essential CSF light adaptation behavior used in the design of luminance quantization nonlinearities

The human visual system’s luminance nonlinearity ranges continuously from square root behavior in the very dark, gamma-like behavior in dim ambient, cube-root in office lighting, and logarithmic for daylight ranges. Early display quantization nonlinearities have been developed based on luminance bipartite JND data. More advanced approaches considered spatial frequency behavior, and used the Barten light-adaptive Contrast Sensitivity Function (CSF) modelled across a range of light adaptation to determine the luminance nonlinearity (e.g., DICOM, referred to as a GSDF {grayscale display function}). A recent approach for a GSDF, also referred to as an electrical-to-optical transfer function (EOTF), using that light-adaptive CSF model improves on this by tracking the CSF for the most sensitive spatial frequency, which changes with adaptation level. We explored the cone photoreceptor’s contribution to the behavior of this maximum sensitivity of the CSF as a function of light adaptation, despite the CSF’s frequency variations and that the cone’s nonlinearity is a point-process. We found that parameters of a local cone model could fit the max sensitivity of the CSF model, across all frequencies, and are within the ranges of parameters commonly accepted for psychophysicallytuned cone models. Thus, a linking of the spatial frequency and luminance dimensions has been made for a key neural component. This provides a better theoretical foundation for the recently designed visual signal format using the aforementioned EOTF.

[1]  H. Barlow,et al.  Human contrast discrimination and the threshold of cortical neurons. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  A. Rose The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  A neurophysiology-inspired steady-state color appearance model. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[5]  Scott Miller,et al.  Perceptual Signal Coding for More Efficient Usage of Bit Codes , 2012 .

[6]  M. J. M. Lankheet,et al.  The lateral spread of light adaptation in cat horizontal cell responses , 1993, Vision Research.

[7]  Greg Ward Defining dynamic range , 2008, SIGGRAPH '08.

[8]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Development of an image/threshold database for designing and testing human vision models , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  H. Blume The ACR/NEMA proposal for a greyscale display function standard , 1996 .

[11]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Modelling contrast sensitivity as a function of retinal illuminance and grating area , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  Richard A. Normann,et al.  Photoreceptor contributions to contrast sensitivity: Applications in radiological diagnosis , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  M. Ibrahim Sezan,et al.  Uniform Perceptual Quantization: Applications to Digital Radiography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .

[15]  P. Whittle Increments and decrements: Luminance discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Efficient Sensory Encoding and Bayesian Inference with Heterogeneous Neural Populations , 2014, Neural Computation.

[17]  D. Norren,et al.  Light adaptation of primate cones: An analysis based on extracellular data , 1983, Vision Research.

[18]  Thomas G. Stockham,et al.  Toward the unification of three visual laws and two visual models in brightness perception , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[19]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its e ects on image quality , 1999 .