The Role of Fragility Assessment in Consequence-Based Engineering

Concepts of uncertainty modeling and fragility assessment in earthquake engineering and their applications in consequence-based engineering (CBE) of buildings in a region of low-to-moderate seismicity are presented. Efficient treatment of uncertainties in components and systems that are major contributors to building vulnerability is an essential ingredient of risk assessment and decision making. Current methodologies are reviewed first. A framework for fragility analysis then is demonstrated using an unreinforced masonry building as an example. The importance of fragility analysis in various stages of risk assessment, loss estimation, and decision making in CBE to achieve the desirable long-term objective in reduction of loss and consequence with the most efficient intervention measures is clearly indicated. Current research issues related to vulnerability assessment are identified.

[1]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[2]  Jianlin Song,et al.  Risk evaluation of steel frames with welded connections under earthquake , 2001 .

[3]  Andrew V. Newman,et al.  Should Memphis build for California's earthquakes? , 2003 .

[4]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Probabilistic Capacity Models and Fragility Estimates for Reinforced Concrete Columns based on Experimental Observations , 2002 .

[5]  Johnny Sun,et al.  Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project , 1997 .

[6]  Charles A. Kircher,et al.  Development of Building Damage Functions for Earthquake Loss Estimation , 1997 .

[7]  Yi-Kwei Wen,et al.  Vulnerability Function Framework for Consequence-based Engineering , 2004 .

[8]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design , 1994 .

[9]  D G Elms,et al.  Structural safety–issues and progress , 2004 .

[10]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Acceptable risk bases for design of structures , 2001 .

[11]  Bruce R. Ellingwood.  Validation studies of seismic PRAs , 1990 .

[12]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[13]  M. K. Ravindra,et al.  Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies , 1984 .

[14]  Akshay Gupta,et al.  Behavior of Ductile SMRFs at Various Seismic Hazard Levels , 2000 .

[15]  A. Kiureghian.  Structural Response to Stationary Excitation , 1980 .

[16]  Yi-Kwei Wen,et al.  Evaluation of Pre-Northridge Low-Rise Steel Buildings. II: Reliability , 2000 .

[17]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Method for Probabilistic Evaluation of Seismic Structural Damage , 1996 .

[18]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Earthquake risk assessment of building structures , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Uniform Hazard Ground Motions for Mid-America Cities , 2001 .

[20]  Bruce F. Maison,et al.  Discussion of “Seismic Performance Evaluation of Pre-Northridge Steel Frame Buildings with Brittle Connections” by Kihak Lee and Douglas A. Foutch , 2004 .

[21]  Thalia Anagnos,et al.  Development of a National Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology , 1997 .

[22]  Luis Esteva,et al.  Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses , 2004 .