Measuring commitment to self-tracking: development of the C2ST scale

Self-tracking technologies bring a new set of experiences into our lives. Through sensors and ubiquitous measurements of bodily performance, a new form of automation experience shapes our understanding of our body and our behavior. While for many individuals self-tracking has an important role in their daily lives, a theoretical understanding of the level and behavioral manifestations of commitment to self-tracking is still missing. This paper introduces the concept of commitment to self-tracking and presents the development and first validation of a new 12-item behavior-based scale for its measurement, the Commitment to Self-Tracking (C2ST) scale. Using online survey data from individuals wearing self-tracking technology (N = 300), we explore the underlying factor structure of the scale and determine its reliability and validity. An analysis of the survey data indicates that commitment to self-tracking positively correlates with autonomous motivation for tracking and negatively correlates with controlled motivation. The C2ST scale brings insights on how self-tracking technology, as a novel automation experience, is affecting users’ everyday behaviors. Overall, by emphasizing the feasibility of defining commitment behaviorally, the paper concludes with implications for theory and practice and suggests directions for future research.

[1]  Jordan Etkin.  The Hidden Cost of Personal Quantification , 2016 .

[2]  Jeff Robbins.  GPS navigation…but what is it doing to us? , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society.

[3]  Sarah Pink,et al.  Mundane data: The routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living , 2017, Big Data Soc..

[4]  Phoebe R. Apeagyei,et al.  Application of 3D body scanning technology to human measurement for clothing Fit , 2010, J. Digit. Content Technol. its Appl..

[5]  Judy Kay,et al.  Harnessing Long Term Physical Activity Data—How Long-term Trackers Use Data and How an Adherence-based Interface Supports New Insights , 2017, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[6]  Deborah Lupton,et al.  Self-Tracking Modes: Reflexive Self-Monitoring and Data Practices , 2014 .

[7]  P. Sheeran,et al.  The Intention–Behavior Gap , 2016 .

[8]  Yoash Wiener,et al.  Commitment: A behavioral approach to job involvement☆ , 1977 .

[9]  Frank Vetere,et al.  You Put What, Where?: Hobbyist Use of Insertable Devices , 2016, CHI.

[10]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[11]  Courtney C Simpson,et al.  Calorie counting and fitness tracking technology: Associations with eating disorder symptomatology. , 2017, Eating behaviors.

[12]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Genetically Predicted Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer Risk: Mendelian Randomization Analyses of Data from 145,000 Women of European Descent , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[13]  C. Till.  Exercise as Labour: Quantified Self and the Transformation of Exercise into Labour , 2014 .

[14]  S. Michie,et al.  A self-report measure of engagement with digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs): development and psychometric evaluation of the “DBCI Engagement Scale” , 2019, Translational behavioral medicine.

[15]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  The mobile fitness coach: Towards individualized skill assessment using personalized mobile devices , 2013, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[16]  D. Nemet,et al.  Health-related knowledge and preferences in low socio-economic kindergarteners , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[17]  Henner Gimpel,et al.  Quantifying the Quantified Self: A Study on the Motivations of Patients to Track Their Own Health , 2013, ICIS.

[18]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Design Beyond the Numbers: Sharing, Comparing, Storytelling and the Need for a Quantified Us , 2016, IxD&A.

[19]  Thomas Zimmermann,et al.  Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness , 2014, CHI.

[20]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[21]  Luca Foschini,et al.  Adherent Use of Digital Health Trackers Is Associated with Weight Loss , 2016, PloS one.

[22]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. , 2008 .

[23]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Personal tracking as lived informatics , 2014, CHI.

[24]  Christian Greiffenhagen,et al.  The mundane experience of everyday calorie trackers: Beyond the metaphor of Quantified Self , 2018, New Media Soc..

[25]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II) , 2013 .

[26]  R. Ryan,et al.  Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[27]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Personal Informatics, Self-Insight, and Behavior Change: A Critical Review of Current Literature , 2017, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  Characterizing Visualization Insights from Quantified Selfers' Personal Data Presentations , 2015, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[29]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[30]  L. Piwek,et al.  The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[31]  Brady Robards,et al.  Tool, toy and tutor: Subjective experiences of digital self-tracking , 2018 .

[32]  Gina Neff,et al.  Self-Tracking , 2016 .

[33]  Louis W. Glorfeld.  An Improvement on Horn's Parallel Analysis Methodology for Selecting the Correct Number of Factors to Retain , 1995 .

[34]  Evangelos Karapanos,et al.  How do we engage with activity trackers?: a longitudinal study of Habito , 2015, UbiComp.

[35]  I. Olkin,et al.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[36]  Alexis Dinno,et al.  Exploring the Sensitivity of Horn's Parallel Analysis to the Distributional Form of Random Data , 2009, Multivariate behavioral research.

[37]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  Beyond the Quantified Self: Thematic exploration of a dataistic paradigm , 2017, New Media Soc..

[38]  D. Lupton,et al.  'I Just Want It to Be Done, Done, Done!' Food Tracking Apps, Affects, and Agential Capacities , 2018, Multimodal Technol. Interact..

[39]  Minna Ruckenstein,et al.  Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles , 2014 .

[40]  Jackie Silverman,et al.  You Are What You Track: the Effect of Failing to Log an Experience on Future Use of Tracking Apps , 2016 .

[41]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data , 2014, CHI.

[42]  James N. Gilmore,et al.  Everywear: The quantified self and wearable fitness technologies , 2016, New Media Soc..