Federal policy and the teacher labor market: exploring the effects of NCLB school accountability on teacher turnover

ABSTRACT The media suggest that accountability pressure increases teacher stress and drives teachers away from teaching, resulting in teachers leaving disadvantaged schools that serve larger proportions of poor and minority students. However, no prior work has systematically examined the changes in the national trends of teacher turnover in response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) school accountability. Drawing on nationally representative samples of schools and teachers from the Schools and Staffing Surveys and Teacher Follow-Up Surveys from 1993–2009, this study applied difference-in-differences approaches to examine the effects of NCLB on teacher turnover. We found a weak increase in the average rate of teachers transferring involuntarily to other schools following school-initiated separations, particularly in disadvantaged schools that served larger proportions of poor and minority students. We also observed that NCLB reduced the involuntary attrition rates of teachers. Importantly, the policy effect is indistinguishable from zero on voluntary transfer between schools or voluntary leaving the teaching profession.

[1]  Thomas A Louis,et al.  Jump down to Document , 2022 .

[2]  P. Hare.  Advance Online Publication , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[3]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference , 2015, The Journal of Human Resources.

[4]  Morgan S. Polikoff,et al.  The Politics of Elementary and Secondary Education Act Waivers , 2018 .

[5]  Kara S. Finnigan,et al.  Do Accountability Policy Sanctions Influence Teacher Motivation? Lessons From Chicago’s Low-Performing Schools , 2007 .

[6]  S. Loeb,et al.  How Teacher Turnover Harms Student Achievement , 2011 .

[7]  E. Hanushek,et al.  The Quality and Distribution of Teachers under the No Child Left Behind Act , 2010 .

[8]  Richard J. Murnane,et al.  Estimating the Labor Market Signaling Value of the GED , 2000 .

[9]  Making the Most of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) – Helping States Focus on School Equity, Quality and Climate , 2016 .

[10]  Performance Standards and Employee Effort: Evidence From Teacher Absences: Performance Standards and Employee Effort , 2016 .

[11]  Bruce D. Meyer,et al.  Workers' compensation and injury duration: evidence from a natural experiment. , 1995, The American economic review.

[12]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Chapter 8 – School Accountability , 2011 .

[13]  Linda Darling-Hammond,et al.  Wanted: A National Teacher Supply Policy for Education: The Right Way To Meet the "Highly Qualified Teacher" Challenge. , 2003 .

[14]  Jason A. Grissom,et al.  Estimating the Effects of No Child Left Behind on Teachers’ Work Environments and Job Attitudes , 2014 .

[15]  Mark A. Smylie,et al.  The Expanding Federal Role in Teacher Workforce Policy , 2012 .

[16]  Sandra P. Horn,et al.  Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation , 1997 .

[17]  R. Allen,et al.  The effect of changes in published secondary school admissions on pupil composition , 2012 .

[18]  B. Jacob.  The Effect of Employment Protection on Teacher Effort , 2013, Journal of Labor Economics.

[19]  Barbara Schneider.  Estimating causal effects : using experimental and observational designs : a think tank white paper , 2007 .

[20]  Brian Rowan,et al.  What Large-Scale, Survey Research Tells Us About Teacher What Large-Scale, Survey Research Tells Us About Teacher Effects on Student Achievement: Insights From the Prospectus Effects on Student Achievement: Insights From the Prospectus Study of Elementary Schools Study of Elementary Schools , 2015 .

[21]  D. Ballou.  Achievement Trade-Offs and No Child Left Behind , 2009 .

[22]  M. Hansen,et al.  How Career Concerns Influence Public Workers' Effort: Evidence from the Teacher Labor Market. Working Paper 40. , 2009 .

[23]  Andrew Saultz,et al.  Under Pressure in Atlanta: School Accountability and Special Education Practices during the Cheating Scandal , 2016, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[24]  Anna Vignoles,et al.  Revisiting fixed- and random-effects models: some considerations for policy-relevant education research , 2015 .

[25]  Tom Ahn.  The Missing Link: Estimating the Impact of Incentives on Teacher Effort and Instructional Effectiveness Using Teacher Accountability Legislation Data , 2013, Journal of Human Capital.

[26]  E. Hanushek,et al.  ABOUT SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY , 2004 .

[27]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Careers in organizations: Theory and evidence , 1999 .

[28]  S. Ose.  Working conditions, compensation and absenteeism. , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[29]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement , 1998 .

[30]  James M. McPartland,et al.  Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago , 2011 .

[31]  Wayne Au,et al.  High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis , 2007 .

[32]  Jonah E. Rockoff,et al.  Under Pressure: Job Security, Resource Allocation, and Productivity in Schools under No Child Left Behind , 2014 .

[33]  Gary Barnes,et al.  The Cost of Teacher Turnover in Five School Districts: A Pilot Study. , 2007 .

[34]  Documentation for the 2007-08 Schools and Staffing Survey. NCES 2010-332. , 2010 .

[35]  M. Carnoy,et al.  Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis , 2002 .

[36]  Wei Ling Karen Lam.  Yong Zhao: Catching up or leading the way: American education in the age of globalization , 2011 .

[37]  Steven W. Hemelt.  Performance effects of failure to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP): Evidence from a regression discontinuity framework , 2011 .

[38]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[39]  David P. Sims.  "Going Down With the Ship?" The Effect of School Accountability on the Distribution of Teacher Experience in California , 2009 .

[40]  David C. Berliner,et al.  High-Stakes Testing & Student Learning , 2002 .

[41]  C. L. Turner,et al.  The Impact of the MCAS: Teachers Talk about High-Stakes Testing , 2001, English Journal.

[42]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[43]  Morgan S. Polikoff,et al.  The Waive of the Future? School Accountability in the Waiver Era , 2014 .

[44]  Margaret E. Raymond,et al.  Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance? , 2004 .

[45]  Todd D. Reeves,et al.  Revisiting the Impact of NCLB High-Stakes School Accountability, Capacity, and Resources , 2012 .

[46]  Benjamin K. Master,et al.  Teacher Workforce Developments: Recent Changes in Academic Competitiveness and Job Satisfaction of New Teachers , 2016, Education Finance and Policy.

[47]  Thomas S. Dee,et al.  The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Student Achievement , 2009 .

[48]  David N. Figlio,et al.  School Accountability and Teacher Mobility. NBER Working Paper No. 16070. , 2010 .

[49]  M. Crocco,et al.  The Narrowing of Curriculum and Pedagogy in the Age of Accountability Urban Educators Speak Out , 2007 .

[50]  S. Loeb,et al.  A federal foray into teacher certification: Assessing the Highly qualified teacher' provision of NCLB , 2006 .

[51]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low-performing schools to attract and retain high-quality teachers? , 2004 .

[52]  S. Loeb,et al.  The Impact of Assessment and Accountability on Teacher Recruitment and Retention , 2008 .

[53]  G. Theoharis,et al.  Inclusive Reform as a Response to High-Stakes Pressure? Leading toward Inclusion in the Age of Accountability , 2016, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[54]  David N. Figlio,et al.  School Accountability and Teacher Mobility , 2010 .

[55]  Brian A. Jacob,et al.  The Effects of NCLB on School Resources and Practices , 2013 .