The Perplexing Role of Learner Control in E-Learning: Will Learning and Transfer Benefit or Suffer?

The appeal of e-learning is not surprising given its many proposed advantages (e.g. flexibility, responsiveness to trainees' individual needs, potential cost-effectiveness). However, as pointed out by Ruel et al., academic research in support of the proposed advantages of electronic human resource management systems is scarce. Although this is generally the case for technologically mediated training, the extant research on e-learning actually questions many of its proposed advantages. In this conceptual piece we (1) establish the link between e-learning and learner control, (2) summarize the advantages and disadvantages of learner-controlled e-learning, (3) briefly present the results of a recent study conducted in our research lab that addresses the disadvantages of learner-controlled e-learning for the training of complex material, and (4) discuss research-based recommendations for the application of learner-controlled e-learning in organizational settings.

[1]  S. Alexander.  E‐learning developments and experiences , 2001 .

[2]  David Richard Moore,et al.  E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning , 2006 .

[3]  S. Gully,et al.  Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal--setting process. , 1997 .

[4]  P. Robert-Jan Simons,et al.  Self-regulation and computer aided instruction , 1992 .

[5]  E. Salas,et al.  Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. , 1993 .

[6]  Robert A. Wisher,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF WEB-BASED AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION: , 2006 .

[7]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions , 2003 .

[8]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[9]  D'Arcy A. Becker,et al.  Using hypermedia to provide learner control , 1994 .

[10]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions , 1977 .

[11]  Traci Sitzmann,et al.  The Influence of Goal Orientation Dimensions on Time to Train in a Self-Paced Training Environment , 2009 .

[12]  Raymond A. Noe,et al.  Employee Training and Development , 2001 .

[13]  K. Scheiter,et al.  Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments , 2007 .

[14]  R. Azevedo.  Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning , 2005 .

[15]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Eleanor M. Smith,et al.  Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer , 1998 .

[17]  M. David Merrill.  Learner control in computer based learning , 1980 .

[18]  William D. Milheim.  Perceived Attitudinal Effects of Various Types of Learner Control in an Interactive Video Lesson. , 1989 .

[19]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  Learner-Control Effects: A Review of Reviews and a Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[21]  Cynthia L. Friend,et al.  Learner control in computer-based instruction: a current literature review , 1990 .

[22]  Dean L. Christensen,et al.  Adaptive Control of Learning Time and Content Sequence in Concept Learning Using Computer-Based Instruction. , 1985 .

[23]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Influences of Individual and Situational Characteristics on Measures of Training Effectiveness , 1992 .

[24]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Learner Control and Achievement in Science Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1988 .

[25]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[26]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Chien-Hung Liu,et al.  Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[28]  Steven Hornik,et al.  An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Optimizing e‐learning: Research‐based guidelines for learner‐controlled training , 2004 .

[30]  K. Brown.  An examination of the structure and nomological network of trainee reactions: a closer look at "smile sheets". , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e‐learning effectiveness , 2009 .

[32]  M. Merrill.  Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions , 1975 .

[33]  Bradford S. Bell,et al.  A MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF PROMPTING SELF-REGULATION IN TECHNOLOGY-DELIVERED INSTRUCTION , 2009 .

[34]  F. Paas,et al.  Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning , 2006 .

[35]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  On-Line Course Effectiveness: An Analysis of Student Interactions and Perceptions of Learning , 2007 .

[36]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  E-Learning in Organizations , 2005 .

[37]  Traci Sitzmann.  A META-ANALYTIC EXAMINATION OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTER-BASED SIMULATION GAMES , 2011 .

[38]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[39]  G. Dryden.  The Learning Revolution , 1994 .

[40]  H. Hintze,et al.  Students' Attitudes towards Control Methods in Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1988 .

[41]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  The role of Web‐based distance learning in HR development , 2004 .

[42]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  Conscientiousness, goal orientation, and motivation to learn during the learning process: A longitudinal study. , 1998 .

[43]  R. Snow,et al.  Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[44]  Kurt Kraiger,et al.  Transforming Our Models of Learning and Development: Web-Based Instruction as Enabler of Third-Generation Instruction , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[45]  R. Owston.  Research news and Comment: The World Wide Web: A Technology to Enhance Teaching and Learning? , 1997 .

[46]  Traci Sitzmann,et al.  Sometimes you need a reminder: the effects of prompting self-regulation on regulatory processes, learning, and attrition. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Dwight W. Allen,et al.  Education and Technology: The Changing Basics. , 1980 .

[48]  Michael E. Wasserman,et al.  Power to the people: using learner control to improve trainee reactions and learning in web-based instructional environments. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[50]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Adaptive Guidance: Enhancing Self-Regulation, Knowledge, and Performance in Technology-Based Training , 2002 .

[51]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. , 1991 .

[52]  Patricia A. Galagan.  THE E-LEARNING REVOLUTION , 2000 .

[53]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics , 1992 .

[54]  E. R. Steinberg.  Cognition and learner control: a literature review, 1977–1988 , 1989 .

[55]  Kenneth G. Brown,et al.  Third-Generation Instruction: “Tools in the Toolbox” Rather Than the “Latest and Greatest” , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[56]  Kenneth G. Brown,et al.  Using computers to deliver training: Which employees learn and why? , 2001 .

[57]  E. A. Locke,et al.  New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory , 2006 .

[58]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[59]  Robert Frank Mager,et al.  Preparing Instructional Objectives , 1962 .

[60]  Ann L. Brown.  Learning, remembering, and understanding , 1982 .

[61]  Kurt Kraiger,et al.  A meta-analytic investigation of learner control: Old findings and new directions. , 2007 .

[62]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Continuing motivation, learner control, and CAI , 1989 .

[63]  Woong-Kyu Lee,et al.  The relationship of e-Learner's self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-Learning environmental quality , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[64]  S.-S. Lee,et al.  Adaptive program vs. learner control strategy on computer aided learning of gravimetric stoichiometry problems , 1989 .

[65]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction , 1984 .

[66]  W. Milheim,et al.  Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. , 1991 .

[67]  Hubertus Johannes Maria Ruel,et al.  The contribution of e-HRM to HRM effectiveness. Results from a quantitative study in a Dutch Ministry. , 2007 .

[68]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[69]  Winston Bennett,et al.  A META-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS AMONG TRAINING CRITERIA , 1997 .

[70]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[71]  Katherine Ely,et al.  Do Second-Generation Models Have More to Offer? , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[72]  Sandra L. Fisher,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF LEARNER EFFORT AND GOAL ORIENTATION ON TWO LEARNING OUTCOMES , 1998 .

[73]  R. Bjork.  Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .

[74]  H. Sullivan,et al.  Matching learner preference to amount of instruction: An alternative form of learner control , 1995 .

[75]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Understanding kiosk navigation: Using log files to capture hypermedia searches , 1996 .

[76]  K. Kraiger,et al.  Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[77]  J. Kevin Ford,et al.  LEARNING WITHIN A LEARNER CONTROL TRAINING ENVIRONMENT: THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GOAL ORIENTATION AND METACOGNITIVE INSTRUCTION ON LEARNING OUTCOMES , 2003 .

[78]  Y. Rich,et al.  Perceptions of school life among physically disabled mainstreamed pupils , 1984 .

[79]  Tara S. Behrend,et al.  Similarity effects in online training: Effects with computerized trainer agents , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[80]  Katherine Ely,et al.  A review and meta-analysis of the nomological network of trainee reactions. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[81]  Sheila Danko,et al.  Disentangling Achievement Orientation and Goal Setting: Effects on Self-Regulatory Processes , 2003 .

[82]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  e-Learning: The student experience , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[83]  R. Bjork,et al.  Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.