Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts

Two experiments examined how cognitive resources are allocated to comprehension processes across two readings of the same scientific texts. In Experiment 1, readers read and later reread texts describing scientific topics. The results indicated that across readings, readers decreased resources allocated to proposition assembly, increased resources allocated to text-level integration, and expended a similar amount of resources to lexical access. Subjects who reread the texts after a week delay showed a similar pattern, except that they did not show the increase for text-level integration. Experiment 2 revealed a similar pattern of results with a moving window procedure, except that there was a significant decrease in resources allocated to lexical access across exposures. This experiment also indicated that the rereading speedup was greatest at sentence boundaries, suggesting that the prior exposure enabled readers to immediately process each word. Overall, the results are consistent with the claim that readers allocate proportionally more available resources to text-level integration during rereading because proposition assembly, which enables text-level integration, can be completed with fewer resources.

[1]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables , 1975 .

[2]  L. Jacoby.  Perceptual enhancement: persistent effects of an experience. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  F. R. Chang.  Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension: Clause effects and pronominal reference , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[4]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative effects of repetition on learning from technical text. , 1986 .

[6]  Lawrence Freedman,et al.  Fluent identification of repeated words. , 1990 .

[7]  T. Carr,et al.  Repetition and reading: Perceptual encoding mechanisms are very abstract but not very interactive. , 1989 .

[8]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension , 1987 .

[9]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events , 1985 .

[10]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Structural components of reading time , 1980 .

[11]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[12]  M. Masson,et al.  Rereading text: Words and their context , 1991 .

[13]  Betty Ann Levy,et al.  Reprocessing text: Indirect measures of word and message level processes. , 1989 .

[14]  P. Allen,et al.  Perhaps the lexicon is coded as a function of word frequency. , 1992 .

[15]  Rothkope Ez,et al.  Textual constraint as function of repeated inspection. , 1968 .

[16]  M. Masson,et al.  Interactive processes in sentence comprehension and recognition , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  M. Howe,et al.  PRESENTATION VARIABLES AND STUDENTS' ACTIVITIES IN MEANINGFUL LEARNING , 1975 .

[18]  Keith D Horton,et al.  The role of semantic information in reading spatially transformed text , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[20]  D. J. Foss,et al.  Text structure and reading time for sentences , 1980 .

[21]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions , 1985 .

[22]  A. Graesser.  Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word , 1981 .

[23]  Twila Tardif,et al.  Reading a week later: Perceptual and conceptual factors , 1989 .

[24]  P. A. Kolers.  Reading a Year Later. , 1976 .

[25]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Frequency and Repetition Effects in Lexical Memory. , 1977 .

[26]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[27]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[28]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Flexibility in text processing: A strategy competition model , 1990 .

[29]  B. A. Levy,et al.  Reprocessing text: Contributions from conceptually driven processes. , 1990 .

[30]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The Influence of Knowledge-Based Inferences on The Reading Time of Expository Text , 1990 .

[31]  Paul A. Kolers,et al.  Memorial Consequences of Automatized Encoding. , 1975 .

[32]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[34]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Context effects in word identification , 1985 .

[35]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[36]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension , 1982 .

[37]  Keith K. Millis,et al.  Encoding discourse perspective during the reading of a literary text , 1995 .

[38]  R. Flesch.  A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[40]  Carol Bergfeld Mills,et al.  Procedural text: Predictions of importance ratings and recall by models of reading comprehension , 1993 .

[41]  G W McConkie,et al.  What is recalled after hearing a passage? , 1973, Journal of educational psychology.

[42]  T. Carr,et al.  Perceptual abstraction and interactivity in repeated oral reading: Where do things stand? , 1990 .

[43]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[44]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[45]  Betty Ann Levy,et al.  Reaading fluency: Episodic integration across texts. , 1995 .

[46]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[47]  Betty Ann Levy,et al.  Transfer of fluency across repetitions and across texts. , 1993 .

[48]  C. Perfetti.  Verbal efficiency in reading ability. , 1988 .

[49]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Rating the Importance of Structural Units of Prose Passages: A Problem of Metacognitive Development. , 1977 .

[51]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal relatedness and importance of story events , 1985 .

[52]  D. J. Foss.  A discourse on semantic priming , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  G. E. MacKinnon,et al.  Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[54]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Can you repeat that? Qualitative effects of repetition and advance organizers on learning from science prose. , 1983 .

[55]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Relationship Between Single Word Decoding and Reading Comprehension Skill , 1975 .

[56]  P. Dixon,et al.  Literary processing and interpretation: Towards empirical foundations , 1993 .

[57]  Peter Graf,et al.  Reading and remembering: Conceptual and perceptual processing involved in reading rotated passages , 1984 .

[58]  T H Carr,et al.  The level-of-focal-attention hypothesis in oral reading: influence of strategies on the context specificity of lexical repetition effects. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[60]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension , 1987 .

[61]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Individual differences in reprocessing of text. , 1992 .

[62]  F. Schmalhofer,et al.  Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional and situational representations , 1986 .

[63]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .