Dual-task motor performance with a tongue-operated assistive technology compared with hand operations

BackgroundTo provide an alternative motor modality for control, navigation, and communication in individuals suffering from impairment or disability in hand functions, a Tongue Drive System (TDS) has been developed that allows for real time tracking of tongue motion in an unobtrusive, wireless, and wearable device that utilizes the magnetic field generated by a miniature disk shaped magnetic tracer attached to the tip of the tongue. The purpose of the study was to compare the influence of a concurrent motor or cognitive task on various aspects of simple movement control between hand and tongue using the TDS technology.MethodsThirteen young able-bodied adults performed rapid and slow goal-directed movements of hand and tongue (with TDS) with and without a concurrent motor (hand or tongue) or cognitive (arithmetic and memory) task. Changes in reaction time, completion time, speed, correctness, accuracy, variability of displacement, and variability of time due to the addition of a concurrent task were compared between hand and tongue.ResultsThe influence of an additional concurrent task on motor performance was similar between the hand and tongue for slow movement in controlling their displacement. In rapid movement with a concurrent motor task, most aspects of motor performance were degraded in hand, while tongue speed during rapid continuous task was maintained. With a concurrent cognitive task, most aspects of motor performance were degraded in tongue, while hand accuracy during the rapid discrete task and hand speed during the rapid continuous task were maintained.ConclusionRapid goal-directed hand and tongue movements were more consistently susceptible to interference from concurrent motor and cognitive tasks, respectively, compared with the other movement.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[3]  T Ohtsuki,et al.  Increase in Simple Reaction Time of Knee Extension Induced by Simultaneous Bilateral Performance , 1981, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  J. Rothwell Principles of Neural Science , 1982 .

[5]  RP Dum,et al.  The origin of corticospinal projections from the premotor areas in the frontal lobe , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  C Lau,et al.  Comparison of computer interface devices for persons with severe physical disabilities. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[7]  G. Weismer,et al.  Evaluation of a reiterant force-impulse task in the tongue. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  M Wiesendanger,et al.  The problem of bimanual coupling: a reaction time study of simple unimanual and bimanual finger responses. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  B. Vogt,et al.  Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  K. Mosier,et al.  Neural control of tongue movement with respect to respiration and swallowing. , 2001, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[11]  Borís Burle,et al.  Deficit in motor cortical activity for simultaneous bimanual responses , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  M. Laurent,et al.  A dynamical framework to understand performance trade-offs and interference in dual tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Gregory V. Simpson,et al.  Evidence for Anterior Cingulate Cortex Involvement in Monitoring Preparatory Attentional Set , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas in the frontal lobe of the primate , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[15]  Music Musi Georgia Institute of Technology , 2002 .

[16]  Christopher Dromey,et al.  Effects of concurrent motor, linguistic, or cognitive tasks on speech motor performance. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Cerebral areas processing swallowing and tongue movement are overlapping but distinct: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  O. Beauchet,et al.  Stride-to-stride variability while backward counting among healthy young adults , 2005, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[19]  Christopher Dromey,et al.  Speech interactions with linguistic, cognitive, and visuomotor tasks. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[20]  Claudia Voelcker-Rehage,et al.  Age-related Differences in Working Memory and Force Control under Dual-task Conditions , 2006, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[21]  Inge Zijdewind,et al.  Interaction between force production and cognitive performance in humans , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  Xueliang Huo,et al.  A Wireless Tongue-Computer Interface Using Stereo Differential Magnetic Field Measurement , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  Andrew J Fuglevand,et al.  Firing patterns of human genioglossus motor units during voluntary tongue movement. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Maysam Ghovanloo,et al.  Introduction and preliminary evaluation of the Tongue Drive System: wireless tongue-operated assistive technology for people with little or no upper-limb function. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  Xueliang Huo,et al.  A Magneto-Inductive Sensor Based Wireless Tongue-Computer Interface , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  E Fiona Bailey,et al.  Genioglossus and intrinsic electromyographic activities in impeded and unimpeded protrusion tasks. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Maysam Ghovanloo,et al.  Using Unconstrained Tongue Motion as an Alternative Control Mechanism for Wheeled Mobility , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Richard G. Carson,et al.  Dual-task interference: Attentional and neurophysiological influences , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[29]  Maysam Ghovanloo,et al.  Evaluation of a wireless wearable tongue–computer interface by individuals with high-level spinal cord injuries , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[30]  Minoru Shinohara,et al.  Attenuation of corticomuscular coherence with additional motor or non-motor task , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  Christopher M Laine,et al.  Common synaptic input to the human hypoglossal motor nucleus. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.