The Car Sharing Economy: Interaction of Business Model Choice and Product Line Design

Several auto manufacturers have recently introduced car sharing programs. Although the structure of most programs is the same, there is no clear dominant strategy regarding the type of vehicles OEMs should provide through car sharing. In this paper, we consider an OEM who contemplates car sharing and designs its product line by accounting for the trade-off between driving performance and fuel efficiency under CAFE standards. Customers have different valuations of driving performance and decide whether to buy, join car sharing, or rely on their outside option. We find that the OEM increases the fuel efficiency of the vehicles it provides through car sharing. This higher efficiency enables the OEM to charge a higher selling price to the higher end of the market, increasing its profit from selling. This is especially beneficial to higher-end OEMs who face greater cannibalization and can explain why Daimler and BMW have been particularly active in introducing car sharing. Offering car sharing is not always environmentally beneficial. Even when it is, we find that doing so may reduce the OEM's CAFE level. In such cases, incentive multipliers should be granted for each shared car. Finally, if anticipating aggressive CAFE standards, OEMs may introduce car sharing to better absorb the increase in the production cost.

[1]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  Effects of E-Waste Regulation on New Product Introduction , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Thomas Lindhqvist,et al.  Does Leasing Improve End of Product Life Management , 1999 .

[3]  S. Rothenberg Sustainability Through Servicizing , 2007 .

[4]  Chialin Chen,et al.  Design for the Environment: A Quality-Based Model for Green Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Ying Rong,et al.  Toward Mass Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Impacts of the Range and Resale Anxieties , 2014 .

[6]  Vishal V. Agrawal,et al.  The Potential of Servicizing as a Green Business Model , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Impact of Performance-Based Contracting on Product Reliability: An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Tim Kraft,et al.  Replacement Decisions for Potentially Hazardous Substances , 2012 .

[9]  I. Png,et al.  Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions , 1992 .

[10]  Michael W. Toffel,et al.  Contracting for Servicizing , 2008 .

[11]  Karan Girotra,et al.  Bike-Share Systems: Accessibility and Availability , 2018, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Innovative Mobility: Carsharing Outlook , 2018 .

[13]  Jo Yung Wong,et al.  Theory of ground vehicles , 1978 .

[14]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Performance Contracting in After-Sales Service Supply Chains , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[15]  F. Frei,et al.  Zipcar: Influencing Customer Behavior , 2005 .

[16]  Atalay Atasu,et al.  Design Implications of Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  Automobiles on Steroids: Product Attribute Trade-Offs and Technological Progress in the Automobile Sector , 2009 .

[18]  W. Whitt,et al.  Open and closed models for networks of queues , 1984, AT&T Bell Laboratories Technical Journal.

[19]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly , 1988 .

[20]  Steven T. Berry,et al.  Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium , 1995 .

[21]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Service Competition and Product Quality in the U.S. Automobile Industry , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Stephan Biller,et al.  Pricing for Environmental Compliance in the Auto Industry , 2006, Interfaces.

[23]  Aaron Golub,et al.  City CarShare , 2007 .

[24]  D. Greene How Consumers Value Fuel Economy: A Literature Review , 2010 .

[25]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  A Study of Fuel Efficiency and Emission Policy Impact on Optimal Vehicle Design Decisions , 2004 .

[26]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  Shared-Savings Contracts for Indirect Materials in Supply Chains: Channel Profits and Environmental Impacts , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  Is Leasing Greener than Selling? , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[28]  D. Drake Carbon Tariffs: Effects in Settings with Technology Choice and Foreign Comparative Advantage , 2012 .

[29]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  OM Forum - Business Model Innovation for Sustainability , 2013, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[30]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Product Line Design and Production Technology , 2007 .

[31]  Gökçe Esenduran,et al.  A Comparison of Product Take‐Back Compliance Schemes , 2015 .

[32]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Electric Vehicles with a Battery Switching Station: Adoption and Environmental Impact , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Long He,et al.  Service Region Design for Urban Electric Vehicle Sharing Systems , 2017, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[34]  Irene Michelle Berry,et al.  The effects of driving style and vehicle performance on the real-world fuel consumption of U.S. light-duty vehicles , 2010 .

[35]  J CorbettCharles,et al.  Shared-Savings Contracts for Indirect Materials in Supply Chains , 2001 .

[36]  Baris Ata,et al.  Optimizing Organic Waste to Energy Operations , 2012, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[37]  Ravi Subramanian,et al.  Product Design and Supply Chain Coordination Under Extended Producer Responsibility , 2008 .

[38]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  Optimal shared-savings contracts in supply chains: Linear contracts and double moral hazard , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  J. Boyd,et al.  THE EFFECT OF FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS ON THE U.S. AUTOMOTIVE MARKET: AN HEDONIC DEMAND ANALYSIS , 1980 .

[40]  L. Wein,et al.  Inventory Management of Remanufacturable Products , 2000 .

[41]  Mark R. Jacobsen,et al.  Vehicle Scrappage and Gasoline Policy , 2013 .