Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence

ObjectivesWe undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the published and unpublished empirical evidence on the impact of police-led interventions that use procedurally just dialogue focused on improving citizen perceptions of police legitimacy.MethodsThe systematic search included any public police intervention where there was a statement that the intervention involved police dialogue with citizens that either was aimed explicitly at improving police legitimacy, or used at least one core ingredient of procedural justice dialogue: police encouraging citizen participation, remaining neutral in their decision making, conveying trustworthy motives, or demonstrating dignity and respect throughout interactions. The studies included in our meta-analyses also had to include at least one direct outcome that measured legitimacy or procedural justice, or one outcome that is common in the legitimacy extant literature: citizen compliance, cooperation, confidence or satisfaction with police. We conducted separate meta-analyses, using random effects models, for each outcome.ResultsFor every single one of our outcome measures, the effect of legitimacy policing was in a positive direction, and, for all but the legitimacy outcome, statistically significant. Notwithstanding the variability in the mode in which legitimacy policing is delivered (i.e., the study intervention) and the complexities around measurement of legitimacy outcomes, our review shows that the dialogue component of front-line police-led interventions is an important vehicle for promoting citizen satisfaction, confidence, compliance and cooperation with the police, and for enhancing perceptions of procedural justice.ConclusionsIn practical terms, our research shows the benefits of police using dialogue that adopts at least one of the principles of procedural justice as a component part of any type of police intervention, whether as part of routine police activity or as part of a defined police crime control program. Our review provides evidence that legitimacy policing is an important precursor for improving the capacity of policing to prevent and control crime.

[1]  Kristina Murphy,et al.  Public Satisfaction With Police: The Importance of Procedural Justice and Police Performance in Police-Citizen Encounters , 2009 .

[2]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  A. Reiss,et al.  The police and the public , 1971 .

[4]  Lorraine Mazerolle,et al.  Procedural Justice: A systematic literature search and technical report to the National Policing Improvement Agency , 2009 .

[5]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing , 2003 .

[6]  T. Tyler,et al.  Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why Do People Help the Police Fight Crime in Their Communities? , 2010 .

[8]  Ross Homel,et al.  Policing for Prevention: Reducing Crime, Public Intoxication and Injury , 1997 .

[9]  L. Hinds.  Youth, Police Legitimacy and Informal Contact , 2009 .

[10]  Stephen D. Mastrofski,et al.  To Acquiesce or Rebel: Predicting Citizen Compliance with Police Requests , 1999 .

[11]  R. Young,et al.  Informal resolution of complaints against the police , 2005 .

[12]  R. Tuffin,et al.  An evaluation of the impact of the National Reassurance Policing Programme , 2006 .

[13]  T. Tyler,et al.  Reintegrative Shaming, Procedural Justice, and Recidivism: The Engagement of Offenders' Psychological Mechanisms in the Canberra RISE Drinking‐and‐Driving Experiment , 2007 .

[14]  Justice Tankebe,et al.  Beyond Procedural Justice: A Dialogic Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal Justice , 2012 .

[15]  Wayne A. Kerstetter,et al.  Opening a window into police internal affairs: Impact of procedural justice reform on third-party attitudes , 1994 .

[16]  Nancy A. Morris,et al.  Risk‐Focused Policing at Places: An Experimental Evaluation , 2008 .

[17]  Michael J. Gaffney,et al.  Linking confidence in the police with the performance of the police: Community policing can make a difference , 2005 .

[18]  L. Singer.  Reassurance Policing: An Evaluation of the Local Management of Community Safety , 2004 .

[19]  T. Tyler.  Policing in Black and White: Ethnic Group Differences in Trust and Confidence in the Police , 2005 .

[20]  Stephen J. Schulhofer,et al.  Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counter- Terrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans , 2010 .

[21]  Mengyan Dai.  Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters , 2007 .

[22]  B. Bradford,et al.  What is Trust and Confidence in the Police , 2010 .

[23]  James Frank,et al.  Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters: The effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor , 2011 .

[24]  T. Tyler,et al.  PROFILING AND POLICE LEGITIMACY: PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, ATTRIBUTIONS OF MOTIVE, AND ACCEPTANCE OF POLICE AUTHORITY* , 2004 .

[25]  David R. Jones,et al.  Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  Lorraine Mazerolle,et al.  Procedural justice, routine encounters and citizen perceptions of police: main findings from the Queensland Community Engagement Trial (QCET) , 2012 .

[27]  Justice Tankebe,et al.  PUBLIC COOPERATION WITH THE POLICE IN GHANA: DOES PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS MATTER?* , 2009 .

[28]  Michael D. Reisig,et al.  The Construct Validity and Refinement of Process-Based Policing Measures , 2007 .

[29]  J. Goodman-Delahunty.  Four Ingredients: New Recipes for Procedural Justice in Australian Policing , 2010 .

[30]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[31]  T. Tom.  Psychology and Institutional Design , 2008 .

[32]  T. Tyler.  Enhancing Police Legitimacy , 2004 .

[33]  Stephen D. Mastrofski,et al.  Compliance on Demand: The Public's Response to Specific Police Requests , 1996 .

[34]  Lorraine Mazerolle,et al.  Legitimacy in Policing , 2013 .

[35]  Stephen J. Schulhofer,et al.  Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counter- Terrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans , 2010 .

[36]  R. Fischer,et al.  Support for Resistance Among Iraqi Students: An Exploratory Study , 2008 .

[37]  A. Robinson,et al.  Philosophy into practice? Community policing units and domestic violence victim participation , 2000 .

[38]  Jenny Fleming,et al.  Encouraging public cooperation and support for police , 2008 .

[39]  Kristina Murphy,et al.  Understanding Cooperation With Police in a Diverse Society , 2012 .

[40]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[41]  William Wells,et al.  Type of contact and evaluations of police officers: The effects of procedural justice across three types of police-citizen contacts , 2007 .

[42]  Jacqueline Davis,et al.  Legitimacy in Policing : A Systematic Review , 2013 .

[43]  Kristina Murphy,et al.  Public Satisfaction With Police: Using Procedural Justice to Improve Police Legitimacy , 2007 .

[44]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Trust in the Law , 2002 .

[45]  T. Tyler,et al.  Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions? , 2001, Behavioral sciences & the law.