DEVELOPING NEW ANALYTICAL AND NUMERICAL MODELS FOR MR FLUID DAMPERS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS

Magnetorheological (MR) and Electrorheological (ER) fluid dampers provide a fail-safe semi-active control mechanism for suppressing vibration response of structures as these smart fluids can change their apparent viscosity immediately under the influence of magnetic and electrical fields, respectively. MR based damping devices have recently received appropriate attention as they have less power demand, provide better dynamic range and are less sensitive to the temperature and external contaminants as compared to their ER counterparts. This thesis studies physics-based modeling of MR fluid dampers and their application in seismic design of buildings. In the first part of thesis, MR damper modeling and its related subject are studied, while in the second part of the thesis, application of MR dampers in tuned mass damper and bracing system is investigated. The existing models, namely the phenomenological models for simulating the behavior of MR and ER dampers rely on various parameters determined experimentally by the manufacturers for each damper configuration. It is of interest to develop mechanistic models of these dampers which can be applied to various configurations so that their fundamental characteristics can be studied to develop flexible design solutions for smart structures. This research presents a formulation for dynamics analysis of ER and MR fluid dampers in flow and mix mode configurations under harmonic and random excitations. The procedure employs the vorticity transport equation and the regularization function to deal with the unsteady flow and nonlinear behaviour of ER/MR fluid in general motion. Using the developed approach, the damping force of ER/MR damper can be evaluated under any type of excitations. While tuned mass dampers are found to be effective in suppressing vibration in a tall building, integrating them with semi-active MR based control system enables them to perform more efficiently under varying external excitations. To study the application of MR damper in tuned mass damper, a forty-storey tall steel-frame building assumed to be located in the Pacific Coast region of Canada (Vancouver), designed according to the relevant Canadian code and standard, has been studied with and without semi-active and passive tuned mass dampers. The response of the structure has been studied under a variety of ground motions with low, medium and high frequency contents to investigate the performance of the optimally designed semi-active MR based tuned mass damper in comparison to that of a passive tuned mass damper. It has been shown that the semi-active MR based system modifies structural response more effectively than the conventional passive tuned mass damper in both mitigation of the maximum displacement and reduction of the settling time of the building. Finally, the effectiveness of MR damper in structural bracing has been examined. Two steel building structures, five and twenty-storey building designed according to Canadian national building code, have been modeled using the finite element method. These building structures have been equipped with MR dampers in different floors appropriately based on the seismic floor-shear distribution. The governing equations of motion of the structures integrated with MR dampers have been cast into the state space representation for the implementation of the full state LQR combined with clipped optimal control strategies. The response of building structures under passive on and active controlled modes have been obtained for low, medium and high frequency content seismic records and compared.

[1]  J. Ormondroyd Theory of the Dynamic Vibration Absorber , 1928 .

[2]  Jerome J. Connor,et al.  Introduction to Structural Motion Control , 2002 .

[3]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Quasi-Steady Herschel-Bulkley Analysis of Electroand Magneto-Rheological Flow Mode Dampers , 1999 .

[4]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  A METHOD OF ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC APPLICATIONS , 1997 .

[5]  Jin-Hyeong Yoo,et al.  Quasi-Steady Bingham Biplastic Analysis of Electrorheological and Magnetorheological Dampers , 2002 .

[6]  In-Won Lee,et al.  Structural Vibration Control Using Semiactive Tuned Mass Damper , 2005 .

[7]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Intelligent Base Isolation Systems , 1998 .

[8]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  CONTROL OF SEISMICALLY EXCITED CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE EMPLOYING MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL FLUID DAMPERS , 2003 .

[9]  Bijan Samali,et al.  A novel hysteretic model for magnetorheological fluid dampers and parameter identification using particle swarm optimization , 2006 .

[10]  Wl L. Qu,et al.  Seismic response control of frame structures using magnetorheological/electrorheological dampers , 2000 .

[11]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Seismic Control of Civil Structures Utilizing Semi–Active MR Braces , 2003 .

[12]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers , 1998 .

[13]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Large-scale MR fluid dampers: modeling and dynamic performance considerations , 2002 .

[14]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Electrorheological damper with annular ducts for seismic protection applications , 1996 .

[15]  B. Farahmand Azar,et al.  Semi‐active direct control method for seismic alleviation of structures using MR dampers , 2013 .

[16]  D Stancioiu,et al.  MODELLING OF MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPER DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR BY GENETIC ALGORITHMS BASED INVERSE METHOD , 2004 .

[17]  Hyung-Jo Jung Dynamic Modeling of Full-Scale MR Dampers for Civil Engineering Applications , 2001 .

[18]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Seismic Response of Civil Structures Utilizing Semi-Active MR and ER Bracing Systems , 1999 .

[19]  Ashutosh Bagchi,et al.  Dynamic analysis of electro- and magneto-rheological fluid dampers using duct flow models , 2014 .

[20]  Giorgio Serino,et al.  Testing and modelling a semi‐actively controlled steel frame structure equipped with MR dampers , 2004 .

[21]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Evaluation of Structural Control Strategies for Improving Seismic Performance of Buildings with MR Dampers Using Real-Time Large-Scale Hybrid Simulation , 2010 .

[22]  Y. Fujino,et al.  Dynamic characterization of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas , 1994 .

[23]  Kyoung Kwan Ahn,et al.  Modeling of a magneto-rheological (MR) fluid damper using a self tuning fuzzy mechanism , 2009 .

[24]  Vincenzo Gattulli,et al.  Seismic protection of frame structures via semi-active control: modeling and implementation issues , 2009 .

[25]  T. Papanastasiou Flows of Materials with Yield , 1987 .

[26]  H. Gavin Multi-Duct ER Dampers , 2001 .

[27]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Quasi-steady Bingham plastic analysis of an electrorheological flow mode bypass damper with piston bleed , 2003 .

[28]  Faramarz Gordaninejad,et al.  A new magnetorheological fluid?elastomer mount: phenomenological modeling and experimental study , 2009 .

[29]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Analytical and experimental validation of a nondimensional Bingham model for mixed-mode magnetorheological dampers , 2008 .

[30]  Zhaoshuo Jiang,et al.  A fully dynamic magneto-rheological fluid damper model , 2012 .

[31]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Application of some semi‐active control algorithms to a smart base‐isolated building employing MR dampers , 2006 .

[32]  Y. Fujino,et al.  Effectiveness of semi-active tuned mass dampers under harmonic excitation , 2001 .

[33]  N. Wereley,et al.  Nondimensional analysis of semi-active electrorheological and magnetorheological dampers using approximate parallel plate models , 1998 .

[34]  R. K. Miller,et al.  Active Vibration Control of Large Civil Structures , 1988 .

[35]  Leonardo Tavares Stutz,et al.  Stochastic and hybrid methods for the identification in the Bouc-Wen model for magneto – rheological dampers , 2008 .

[36]  H. Metered,et al.  The experimental identification of magnetorheological dampers and evaluation of their controllers , 2010 .

[37]  Osamu Yoshida,et al.  Response Control of Full-Scale Irregular Buildings Using Magnetorheological Dampers , 2005 .

[38]  Fook Fah Yap,et al.  Testing and steady state modeling of a linear MR damper under sinusoidal loading , 2000 .

[39]  Y. Wen Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .

[40]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Bracing Systems for Installation of MR Dampers in a Building Structure , 2007 .

[41]  Cha'o-Kuang Chen,et al.  Unsteady unidirectional flow of Bingham fluid between parallel plates with different given volume flow rate conditions , 2004 .

[42]  Takafumi Fujita,et al.  Response control performance of a hybrid mass damper applied to a tall building , 2001 .

[43]  Ebrahim Esmailzadeh,et al.  Optimal Vibration Suppression of Structures Under Random Base Excitation Using Semi-Active Mass Damper , 2010 .

[44]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Analysis and Testing of Electrorheological Bypass Dampers , 1999 .

[45]  Stefan Hurlebaus,et al.  Application of semi-active control strategies for seismic protection of buildings with MR dampers , 2010 .

[46]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy model of hybrid semi-active base isolation system with FPS bearings and an MR damper , 2006 .

[47]  Norio Iwata,et al.  Dynamic tests and simulation of magneto-rheological dampers , 2003 .

[48]  R. Sedaghati,et al.  Semi-Active Tuned Mass Damper for Seismic Applications , 2011 .

[49]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Modeling of a large‐scale magneto‐rheological damper for seismic hazard mitigation. Part II: Semi‐active mode , 2013 .

[50]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Experimental Investigation of MR Damper-based Semiactive Control Algorithms for Full-scale Five-story Steel Frame Building , 2010 .

[51]  Faramarz Gordaninejad,et al.  Modular High-Force Seismic Magneto-Rheological Fluid Damper , 2010 .

[52]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study , 2000 .

[53]  John B. Mander,et al.  Semi-active tuned mass damper building systems: Design , 2009 .

[54]  Katsuaki Sunakoda,et al.  Development of Large Capacity Semi-Active Seismic Damper Using Magneto-Rheological Fluid , 2004 .

[55]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas , 2008 .

[56]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Seismic response control using smart dampers , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[57]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Semi‐active control of sliding isolated bridges using MR dampers: an experimental and numerical study , 2005 .

[58]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Semiactive Control of Building Structures with Semiactive Tuned Mass Damper , 2005 .

[59]  P. Dahl Solid Friction Damping of Mechanical Vibrations , 1976 .

[60]  K. S. Jagadish,et al.  The inelastic vibration absorber subjected to earthquake ground motions , 1979 .

[61]  Juan Carlos de la Llera,et al.  Tall building vibration control using a TM‐MR damper assembly , 2011 .

[62]  Juan Carlos de la Llera,et al.  Tall building vibration control using a TM‐MR damper assembly: Experimental results and implementation , 2011 .

[63]  Toni Liedes,et al.  Improving the performance of the semi-active tuned mass damper , 2009 .

[64]  Jinping Ou,et al.  Modeling and Analyzing of Hysteresis Behavior of Magneto Rheological Dampers , 2011 .

[65]  Hyun-Su Kim,et al.  Mitigation of wind response of a tall building using semi‐active tuned mass dampers , 2011 .

[66]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Nondimensional Herschel—Bulkley Analysis of Magnetorheological and Electrorheological Dampers , 2008 .

[67]  D. Gamota,et al.  Dynamic mechanical studies of electrorheological materials: Moderate frequencies , 1991 .

[68]  G. B. Warburton,et al.  Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters , 1982 .

[69]  J. Powell Modelling the oscillatory response of an electrorheological fluid , 1994 .

[70]  José Rodellar,et al.  Parametric identification of the Dahl model for large scale MR dampers , 2012 .

[71]  Khaldoon A. Bani-Hani,et al.  Semi‐active neuro‐control for base‐isolation system using magnetorheological (MR) dampers , 2006 .

[72]  M. Rabins,et al.  Semi‐Active versus Passive or Active Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Control , 1983 .

[73]  C. Pozrikidis,et al.  Fluid Dynamics: Theory, Computation, and Numerical Simulation , 2001 .

[74]  Reza Langari,et al.  Seismic response control of a large civil structure equipped with magnetorheological dampers , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[75]  S. Olutunde Oyadiji,et al.  Design, modelling and testing of magnetorheological (MR) dampers using analytical flow solutions , 2008 .

[76]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Investigation of semi-active control for seismic protection of elevated highway bridges , 2002 .

[77]  Søren Nielsen,et al.  Semi-active control of three-dimensional vibrations of an inclined sag cable with magnetorheological dampers , 2006 .

[78]  G. Marano,et al.  Optimization criteria for tuned mass dampers for structural vibration control under stochastic excitation , 2011 .

[79]  B.J. Bass,et al.  System Identification of a 200 kN Magneto-Rheological Fluid Damper for Structural Control in Large-Scale Smart Structures , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[80]  Kyoung Kwan Ahn,et al.  Identification and application of black-box model for a self-sensing damping system using a magneto-rheological fluid damper , 2010 .

[81]  James Lam,et al.  Modelling of a magneto-rheological damper by evolving radial basis function networks , 2006, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[82]  Yang Runlin,et al.  Seismic structural control using semi-active tuned mass dampers , 2002 .

[83]  Zhaoshuo Jiang,et al.  A comparison of 200 kN magneto-rheological damper models for use in real-time hybrid simulation pretesting , 2011 .

[84]  R. Guyan Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices , 1965 .

[85]  Haiyan Hu,et al.  Nonlinear Stiffness of a Magneto-Rheological Damper , 2005 .

[86]  Roland Glowinski,et al.  On the numerical simulation of Bingham visco-plastic flow: Old and new results , 2007 .

[87]  杨润林,et al.  Seismic structural control using semi-active tuned mass dampers , 2002 .

[88]  John B. Mander,et al.  Semi‐active tuned mass damper building systems: Application , 2009 .

[89]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Cable Vibration Control using Magnetorheological Dampers , 2006 .

[90]  Hamid Reza Karimi,et al.  An iterative based approach for hysteresis parameters estimation in Magnetorheological dampers , 2012, 2012 6th IEEE International Conference Intelligent Systems.

[91]  C. S. Cai,et al.  Cable Vibration Control with a TMD-MR Damper System: Experimental Exploration , 2007 .

[92]  E. Dragoni,et al.  Efficient dynamic modelling and characterization of a magnetorheological damper , 2012 .

[93]  Ion Stiharu,et al.  A new dynamic hysteresis model for magnetorheological dampers , 2006 .

[94]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection , 1998 .

[95]  S.J. Dyke,et al.  A comparison of semi-active control strategies for the MR damper , 1997, Proceedings Intelligent Information Systems. IIS'97.

[96]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Analysis and testing of Bingham plastic behavior in semi-active electrorheological fluid dampers , 1996 .

[97]  J. L. Sproston,et al.  Non-linear modelling of an electro-rheological vibration damper , 1987 .

[98]  Jeong-Hoi Koo,et al.  Using Magneto-Rheological Dampers in Semiactive Tuned Vibration Absorbers to Control Structural Vibrations , 2003 .

[99]  Luis Alvarez-Icaza,et al.  LuGre friction model for a magnetorheological damper , 2005 .

[100]  I. Frigaard,et al.  On the usage of viscosity regularisation methods for visco-plastic fluid flow computation , 2005 .

[101]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Adaptive passive, semiactive, smart tuned mass dampers: identification and control using empirical mode decomposition, hilbert transform, and short‐term fourier transform , 2009, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[102]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  “Smart” Base Isolation Strategies Employing Magnetorheological Dampers , 2002 .

[103]  Ruben Morales-Menendez,et al.  An experimental artificial-neural-network-based modeling of magneto-rheological fluid dampers , 2012 .

[104]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: Current practice and recent developments , 2008 .

[105]  Felix Weber,et al.  Frequency and damping adaptation of a TMD with controlled MR damper , 2012 .