Life cycle sustainability assessment of products

Background Aims and ScopeSustainability was adopted by UNEP in Rio de Janeiro (1992) as the main political goal for the future development of humankind. It should also be the ultimate aim of product development. According to the well known interpretation of the original definition given in the Brundtland report, sustainability comprises three components: environment, economy and social aspects. These components or “pillars” of sustainability have to be properly assessed and balanced if a new product is to be designed or an existing one is to be improved.MethodsThe responsibility of the researchers involved in the assessment is to provide appropriate and reliable instruments. For the environmental part there is already an internationally standardized tool: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is the logical counterpart of LCA for the economic assessment. LCC surpasses the purely economic cost calculation by taking into account the use-and end-of-life phases and hidden costs. For this component, a guideline is being developed by SETAC as a basis for future standardization. It is a very important point that different life-cycle based methods (including Social Life Cycle Assessment ‘SLCA’) for sustainability assessment use consistent — ideally identical — system boundaries. This requirement includes that in LCC the physical life cycle (‘from cradle-to-grave’) is used instead of the frequently used marketing life cycle (‘from product development-to-end of market life’).Future DevelopmentsSLCA has been neglected in the past, but is now beginning to be developed. The central problems seem to be how to relate the social indicators (social impact assessment) to the functional unit of the product-system and how to restrict the many social indicators proposed to a manageable number. Meanwhile, qualitative and semi-quantitative approaches are used as substitutes for a full, quantitative SLCA. It is hoped that new methods will be developed and finally standardized by ISO. The combination of LCA, LCC and SLCA will provide the much needed tool for sustainability assessment of products.

[1]  Andreas Kicherer,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis by basf: the method , 2002 .

[2]  Helias A. Udo de Haes,et al.  How to approach land use in LCIA or, how to avoid the Cinderella effect? , 2006 .

[3]  C. Bauer,et al.  Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA (11 pp) , 2007 .

[4]  Peter Saling,et al.  Assessment of toxicological risks for life cycle assessment and eco-efficiency analysis , 2002 .

[5]  Gregory A. Norris Towards Life Cycle Attribute Assessment , 2006 .

[6]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Methodologies for social life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[7]  Louise Camilla Dreyer,et al.  Feasibility Study: Integration of social aspects into LCA , 2006 .

[8]  Roland Clift,et al.  Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA) , 1996 .

[9]  G. Norris Social Impacts in Product Life Cycles - Towards Life Cycle Attribute Assessment , 2006 .

[10]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life-Cycle based methods for sustainable product development , 2003 .

[11]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Why We Need Better Eco-Efficiency Analysis , 2007 .

[12]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Societal LCA Methodology and Case Study (12 pp) , 2006 .

[13]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[14]  Alan C. Brent,et al.  Social Indicators for Sustainable Project and Technology Life Cycle Management in the Process Industry (13 pp + 4) , 2006 .

[15]  Walter Klöpffer Reductionism versus expansionism in LCA , 1996 .

[16]  David Hunkeler,et al.  The Future of Life Cycle Assessment , 2005 .

[17]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life-Cycle Based Sustainability Assessment of Products , 2008 .

[18]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective , 2012 .

[19]  Sandra Bellekom,et al.  Feasibility of Applying Site-dependent Impact Assessment of Acidification in LCA (8 pp) , 2006 .

[20]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Costing , 2008 .

[21]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  The Integration of Economic and Social Aspects in Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2006 .

[22]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[23]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Eco-efficiency: Combining life cycle assessment and life cycle costs via normalization , 2007 .

[24]  Pall Rikhardsson,et al.  Implementing environmental management accounting : status and challenges , 2005 .

[25]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  The Role of SETAC in the Development of LCA , 2006 .

[26]  G. H. Brundtland World Commission on environment and development , 1985 .

[27]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Lebenszyklusbasierte Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von Produkten , 2007 .

[28]  M. Hauschild,et al.  A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment (10 pp) , 2006 .