A novel non-probabilistic approach using interval analysis for robust design optimization

A technique for formulation of the objective and constraint functions with uncertainty plays a crucial role in robust design optimization. This paper presents the first application of interval methods for reformulating the robust optimization problem. Based on interval mathematics, the original real-valued objective and constraint functions are replaced with the interval-valued functions, which directly represent the upper and lower bounds of the new functions under uncertainty. The single objective function is converted into two objective functions for minimizing the mean value and the variation, and the constraint functions are reformulated with the acceptable robustness level, resulting in a bi-level mathematical model. Compared with other methods, this method is efficient and does not require presumed probability distribution of uncertain factors or gradient or continuous information of constraints. Two numerical examples are used to illustrate the validity and feasibility of the presented method.

[1]  Wei Chen,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Modeling Feasibility Robustness in Engineering Design , 2000 .

[2]  Kwon-Hee Lee,et al.  Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables , 2001 .

[3]  Indraneel Das,et al.  ROBUSTNESS OPTIMIZATION FOR CONSTRAINED NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS , 2000 .

[4]  Zhang Quan,et al.  A Ranking Approach for Interval Numbers in Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making Problems , 1999 .

[5]  Ramon E. Moore.  Methods and applications of interval analysis , 1979, SIAM studies in applied mathematics.

[6]  Jyh-Cheng Yu,et al.  Design for Robustness Based on Manufacturing Variation Patterns , 1998 .

[7]  S. Azarm,et al.  A New Deterministic Approach Using Sensitivity Region Measures for Multi-Objective Robust and Feasibility Robust Design Optimization , 2005, DAC 2005.

[8]  H. Ishibuchi,et al.  Multiobjective programming in optimization of the interval objective function , 1990 .

[9]  A. Ismail-Yahaya,et al.  Multiobjective robust design using physical programming , 2002 .

[10]  Carl D. Sorensen,et al.  A general approach for robust optimal design , 1993 .

[11]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  A Feasibility Robust Optimization Method Using Sensitivity Region Concept , 2005 .

[12]  K. M. Ragsdell,et al.  Optimal Design of a Class of Welded Structures Using Geometric Programming , 1976 .

[13]  A. Belegundu,et al.  Robustness of Design Through Minimum Sensitivity , 1992 .

[14]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Quality Engineering through Design Optimization , 1989 .

[15]  Jianmin Zhu,et al.  Performance Distribution Analysis and Robust Design , 2001 .

[16]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation , 2002 .

[17]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  Handling Equality Constraints in Robust Design Optimization , 2003 .

[18]  Debjani Chakraborty,et al.  Interpretation of inequality constraints involving interval coefficients and a solution to interval linear programming , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..