Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation

Structure of the nCoV trimeric spike The World Health Organization has declared the outbreak of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) to be a public health emergency of international concern. The virus binds to host cells through its trimeric spike glycoprotein, making this protein a key target for potential therapies and diagnostics. Wrapp et al. determined a 3.5-angstrom-resolution structure of the 2019-nCoV trimeric spike protein by cryo–electron microscopy. Using biophysical assays, the authors show that this protein binds at least 10 times more tightly than the corresponding spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)–CoV to their common host cell receptor. They also tested three antibodies known to bind to the SARS-CoV spike protein but did not detect binding to the 2019-nCoV spike protein. These studies provide valuable information to guide the development of medical counter-measures for 2019-nCoV. Science, this issue p. 1260 The overall structure of the 2019-nCoV spike (S) protein resembles that of SARS-CoV S, but 2019-nCoV S binds more tightly to the host receptor. The outbreak of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) represents a pandemic threat that has been declared a public health emergency of international concern. The CoV spike (S) glycoprotein is a key target for vaccines, therapeutic antibodies, and diagnostics. To facilitate medical countermeasure development, we determined a 3.5-angstrom-resolution cryo–electron microscopy structure of the 2019-nCoV S trimer in the prefusion conformation. The predominant state of the trimer has one of the three receptor-binding domains (RBDs) rotated up in a receptor-accessible conformation. We also provide biophysical and structural evidence that the 2019-nCoV S protein binds angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) with higher affinity than does severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV S. Additionally, we tested several published SARS-CoV RBD-specific monoclonal antibodies and found that they do not have appreciable binding to 2019-nCoV S, suggesting that antibody cross-reactivity may be limited between the two RBDs. The structure of 2019-nCoV S should enable the rapid development and evaluation of medical countermeasures to address the ongoing public health crisis.

[1]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  David J Stevens,et al.  Structure of the Hemagglutinin Precursor Cleavage Site, a Determinant of Influenza Pathogenicity and the Origin of the Labile Conformation , 1998, Cell.

[3]  J Pulokas,et al.  Leginon: an automated system for acquisition of images from vitreous ice specimens. , 2000, Journal of structural biology.

[4]  Randy J Read,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Phenix: Building New Software for Automated Crystallographic Structure Determination Biological Crystallography Phenix: Building New Software for Automated Crystallographic Structure Determination , 2022 .

[5]  B. Bosch,et al.  The Coronavirus Spike Protein Is a Class I Virus Fusion Protein: Structural and Functional Characterization of the Fusion Core Complex , 2003, Journal of Virology.

[6]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[7]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[8]  Yang Feng,et al.  Structure of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Receptor-binding Domain Complexed with Neutralizing Antibody* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  William C. Hwang,et al.  Structural Basis of Neutralization by a Human Anti-severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Spike Protein Antibody, 80R* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  B. Bosch,et al.  Cathepsin L Functionally Cleaves the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Class I Fusion Protein Upstream of Rather than Adjacent to the Fusion Peptide , 2008, Journal of Virology.

[11]  G. Whittaker,et al.  Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Christian Drosten,et al.  Evidence that TMPRSS2 Activates the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein for Membrane Fusion and Reduces Viral Control by the Humoral Immune Response , 2011, Journal of Virology.

[13]  Piotr Sliz,et al.  Collaboration gets the most out of software , 2013, eLife.

[14]  Frank DiMaio,et al.  Glycan shield and epitope masking of a coronavirus spike protein observed by cryo-electron microscopy , 2016, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[15]  Barney S. Graham,et al.  Pre-fusion structure of a human coronavirus spike protein , 2016, Nature.

[16]  Fang Li,et al.  Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins. , 2016, Annual review of virology.

[17]  A. Walls,et al.  Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Barney S. Graham,et al.  Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Yi Shi,et al.  Cryo-EM structures of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV spike glycoproteins reveal the dynamic receptor binding domains , 2017, Nature Communications.

[20]  Haixia Zhou,et al.  Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein reveal a prerequisite conformational state for receptor binding , 2016, Cell Research.

[21]  David J. Fleet,et al.  cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination , 2017, Nature Methods.

[22]  José María Carazo,et al.  Automatic local resolution-based sharpening of cryo-EM maps , 2018, bioRxiv.

[23]  Alexis Rohou,et al.  cisTEM: User-friendly software for single-particle image processing , 2018 .

[24]  Alexis Rohou,et al.  cisTEM: User-friendly software for single-particle image processing , 2017, bioRxiv.

[25]  Tristan Ian Croll,et al.  ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps , 2018, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology.

[26]  Xinquan Wang,et al.  Cryo-EM structure of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein in complex with its host cell receptor ACE2 , 2018, PLoS pathogens.

[27]  Daniel Wrapp,et al.  Stabilized coronavirus spikes are resistant to conformational changes induced by receptor recognition or proteolysis , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Barney S. Graham,et al.  Publisher Correction: Stabilized coronavirus spikes are resistant to conformational changes induced by receptor recognition or proteolysis , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[29]  A. Walls,et al.  Unexpected Receptor Functional Mimicry Elucidates Activation of Coronavirus Fusion , 2019, Cell.

[30]  J. McLellan,et al.  The 3.1-Angstrom Cryo-electron Microscopy Structure of the Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Spike Protein in the Prefusion Conformation , 2019, Journal of Virology.

[31]  Dimitry Tegunov,et al.  Real-time cryo–EM data pre-processing with Warp , 2019, Nature Methods.

[32]  José María Carazo,et al.  Automatic local resolution-based sharpening of cryo-EM maps , 2020, Bioinform..

[33]  Ting Yu,et al.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study , 2020, The Lancet.

[34]  S. Lo,et al.  A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster , 2020, The Lancet.

[35]  B. Canard,et al.  The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade , 2020, Antiviral Research.

[36]  Potent binding of 2019 novel coronavirus spike protein by a SARS coronavirus-specific human monoclonal antibody , 2020, Emerging microbes & infections.

[37]  Y. Hu,et al.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China , 2020, The Lancet.

[38]  E. Holmes,et al.  Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding , 2020, The Lancet.

[39]  E. Holmes,et al.  A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China , 2020, Nature.

[40]  Christian Drosten,et al.  The novel coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV) uses the SARS-coronavirus receptor ACE2 and the cellular protease TMPRSS2 for entry into target cells , 2020, bioRxiv.

[41]  Kai Zhao,et al.  A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin , 2020, Nature.

[42]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  Ralph S. Baric,et al.  Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus , 2020, Journal of Virology.