Use of additives to improve the efficiency of thermal heavy oil and bitumen recovery processes has been studied extensively over the decades. Two common types of additives used in thermal applications, mainly steam assisted recovery, are solvents and surfactants. Commercial use of solvents has setbacks due to their high costs and retrieval difficulties. Cost and stability of the surfactants under reservoir operating temperature and pressure are the major concerns. We propose the use of bioDiesel such as fatty acids methyl ester as a surfactant additive reducing heavy oil/bitumen-water interfacial tension in steam assisted recovery processes. Advantages of using bioDiesel as a surfactant additive are that bioDiesel is chemically stable under the operating pressure and temperature of the reservoir, it causes no harm on bitumen fuel quality and on release water chemistry and its use is economically feasible.We conducted a series of steam assisted bitumen recovery experiments to clarify the additional recovery potential and efficiency improvement capacity of bioDiesel. High pressure steam at 1.8 MPa pressure, 205°C was used in these tests at a 900 g/h feed rate. The porous media used was a normal grade oil sands ore obtained from a surface mine operation in Northern Alberta, Canada. Oil sands ore was packed in a basket and placed in a high pressure cell. Bitumen recovery experiments were performed by spraying canola oil fatty acid methyl ester on oil sands ore at a 2 g/kg-bitumen dosage. These tests show that bitumen recovery efficiency increases over 40%. In another series of tests, tall oil fatty acids methyl ester was injected into a high pressure steam line at a 8.3 g-bioDiesel/kg-steam dosage. Because of the solubility of bioDiesel in bitumen, the effect of bioDiesel on bitumen recovery could not be accurately concluded. Vapor pressure measurements performed on canola oil and tall oil derived bioDiesel samples suggest that saturation compositions of bioDiesel in steam at 1.8 MPa pressure and 205°C are at least one order of magnitude higher than the requested bioDiesel dosages. Further tests are planned by reducing bioDiesel dosages to about 0.5 to 1.0 g-bioDiesel/kilogram-steam and by monitoring the solubility of bioDiesel in bitumen.
[1]
Tayfun Babadagli,et al.
SAGD laboratory experimental and numerical simulation studies: A review of current status and future issues
,
2009
.
[2]
E. W. Allen.
Process water treatment in Canada’s oil sands industry: I. Target pollutants and treatment objectives
,
2008
.
[3]
J. Zwiazek,et al.
Jack pine growth and elemental composition are affected by saline tailings water.
,
2002,
Journal of environmental quality.
[4]
K. A. Clark,et al.
Hot Water Seperation of Bitumen from Alberta Bituminous Sand
,
1932
.
[5]
E. W. Allen.
Process water treatment in Canada’s oil sands industry: II. A review of emerging technologies
,
2008
.
[6]
A. Hansen,et al.
Vapor pressure and normal boiling point predictions for pure methyl esters and biodiesel fuels
,
2005
.
[7]
C. W. Bowman,et al.
Molecular and Interfacial Properties of Athabasca Tar Sands
,
1967
.
[8]
James G. Speight,et al.
Surface-active materials from Athabasca oil sands
,
1980
.
[9]
James G. Speight,et al.
Water-soluble constituents of Athabasca bitumen
,
1977
.
[10]
James G. Speight,et al.
Factors affecting bitumen recovery by the hot water process
,
1978
.