Effects of acoustic parameters on bubble cloud dynamics in ultrasound tissue erosion (histotripsy).

High intensity pulsed ultrasound can produce significant mechanical tissue fractionation with sharp boundaries ("histotripsy"). At a tissue-fluid interface, histotripsy produces clearly demarcated tissue erosion and the erosion efficiency depends on pulse parameters. Acoustic cavitation is believed to be the primary mechanism for the histotripsy process. To investigate the physical basis of the dependence of tissue erosion on pulse parameters, an optical method was used to monitor the effects of pulse parameters on the cavitating bubble cloud generated by histotripsy pulses at a tissue-water interface. The pulse parameters studied include pulse duration, peak rarefactional pressure, and pulse repetition frequency (PRF). Results show that the duration of growth and collapse (collapse cycle) of the bubble cloud increased with increasing pulse duration, peak rarefactional pressure, and PRF when the next pulse arrived after the collapse of the previous bubble cloud. When the PRF was too high such that the next pulse arrived before the collapse of the previous bubble cloud, only a portion of histotripsy pulses could effectively create and collapse the bubble cloud. The collapse cycle of the bubble cloud also increased with increasing gas concentration. These results may explain previous in vitro results on effects of pulse parameters on tissue erosion.

[1]  G M Preminger,et al.  Inertial cavitation and associated acoustic emission produced during electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  A new method of quantitative cavitation assessment in the field of a lithotripter. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  S. Daniels,et al.  Evidence for Acoustic Cavitation In Vivo: Thresholds for Bubble Formation with 0.75-MHz Continuous Wave and Pulsed Beams , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  E. H. Chiang,et al.  Acoustic generation of bubbles in excised canine urinary bladders. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  C. Cain,et al.  Microbubble-enhanced cavitation for noninvasive ultrasound surgery , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  Pulsed Enhancement of acoustic cavitation: a postulated model. , 1981, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  J. Saunders,et al.  Detection of acoustic emission from cavitation in tissue during clinical extracorporeal lithotripsy. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  M. Arora,et al.  Cavitation cluster dynamics in shock-wave lithotripsy: part 1. Free field. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  C. Cain,et al.  1D-4 High Speed Imaging of Bubble Clouds in Pulsed Cavitational Ultrasound Therapy - Histotripsy , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[10]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Investigation of intensity thresholds for ultrasound tissue erosion. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  K. Hynynen The threshold for thermally significant cavitation in dog's thigh muscle in vivo. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  In vivo detection of ultrasonically induced cavitation by a fibre-optic technique. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  A. Evan,et al.  Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves. , 2003, Journal of endourology.

[14]  L. Crum,et al.  Thresholds for inertial cavitation in Albunex suspensions under pulsed ultrasound conditions , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  C. Church,et al.  A theoretical study of cavitation generated by an extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Lawrence A Crum,et al.  In vitro sonoluminescence and sonochemistry studies with an electrohydraulic shock-wave lithotripter. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  J. E. Parsons,et al.  Pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy for controlled tissue homogenization. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  M Whitlock,et al.  The spatial distribution of cavitation induced acoustic emission, sonoluminescence and cell lysis in the field of a shock wave lithotripter. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  J Brian Fowlkes,et al.  Pulsed cavitational ultrasound: a noninvasive technology for controlled tissue ablation (histotripsy) in the rabbit kidney. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[20]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: the role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  J. Saunders,et al.  The cavitation threshold of human tissue exposed to 0.2-MHz pulsed ultrasound: preliminary measurements based on a study of clinical lithotripsy. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  F Dunn,et al.  Involvement of ultrasonically induced cavitation in the production of hind limb paralysis of the mouse neonate. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  E. Carstensen,et al.  Lung damage from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  K Hynynen,et al.  The feasibility of using focused ultrasound for transmyocardial revascularization. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  Brian D. Storey,et al.  Radial Response of Individual Bubbles Subjected to Shock Wave Lithotripsy Pulses In Vitro , 2002 .

[26]  J. E. Parsons,et al.  Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. Lock,et al.  Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome With Intact or Highly Restrictive Atrial Septum: Outcome After Neonatal Transcatheter Atrial Septostomy , 2004, Circulation.

[28]  C. Cain,et al.  Optical and acoustic monitoring of bubble cloud dynamics at a tissue-fluid interface in ultrasound tissue erosion. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J E Saunders,et al.  The influence of fluid properties and pulse amplitude on bubble dynamics in the field of a shock wave lithotripter. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  R. C. Eggleton,et al.  Threshold ultrasonic dosages for structural changes in the mammalian brain. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  F Dunn,et al.  Ultrasonic threshold dosages for the mammalian central nervous system. , 1971, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[32]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  Thresholds for cavitation produced in water by pulsed ultrasound. , 1988, Ultrasonics.

[33]  J. Mcateer,et al.  Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Control of cavitation activity by different shockwave pulsing regimes. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  R E Apfel,et al.  Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  C. Cain,et al.  Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[37]  R. Écochard,et al.  In vivo effects of high-intensity ultrasound on prostatic adenocarcinoma Dunning R3327. , 1992, Cancer research.

[38]  J. Debus,et al.  Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.